You need to get some manners and have a bit of respect before we can have a debate. Until then, you're in Coventry.

I didn't condemn her words, I said the timing and delivery was inappropriate. S
She knew what language he habitually used, as she referred to people being harrasssed in the street using words he used.

As I said, it was far too serious a subject to think yelling at a person is going to bring the desired results if that is what you truly want, rather than trying to embarass and goad them into retaliating. He is now refusing to stop using the words 'surrender bill'.
A behind the scenes meeting with him could have brought success, we'll never know.
So not surprisingly, given her way of handling a serious subject, she failed.

Exactly ,fancy advertising to the nutters of the country how 'scared' you are and how it gets to you,they will do it even more ,but as you say ,good publicity for them .

And they talk about the language used in parliament :laugh::wavey:

Good leaders avoid inflammatory language when speaking about issues like this for a reason, if you can't accept that using language on a national stage that makes out that people who disagree with you are the enemy of the people, then you're part of the radicalised masses that probably cheer on such behaviour.

You absolutely did condemn her words, you said they were horrific.
Yes she knew what language he used, her exchange was after several members had requested he tempered his language. He was never going to stop using that term no matter how he was asked.
You have attempted to victim blame here and it's shameful, she gave an empassioned plea to his better nature not realising perhaps he doesn't have one....
She did not fail, she succeeded more people are now aware of the inappropriate comments the PM makes than ever.

More victim blaming.

The image in my head D:

Respect is earned, not given on demand and your argument of accepting MPs that you know have lied to your face deserves no respect.

It may have a direction at me Kizzy.
Since I said earlier on this thread how fearful I was becoming even just canvassing.
Never mind what MPs must be feeling.
Which I mostly got from some, only derision on.

So I must be advertising to the nutters too my worries.
So my fault admitting I have fears, if MPs have fears are stupid for advertising their fears.

The real nutters are more possibly those who brand people traitors, cowards who surrender or terrorists.
Firing generalised accusations around like confetti.


More victim blaming definitely as you say.

They wouldn't maybe do so and think more, if the dangerous accusations were being fired at them, their families or people they like.
Rather than not giving a jot for those receiving those threats who they don't care for.
Disgraceful .

Says you using inflammatory language....and as usual, painting people with broad strokes.

As a Corbyn admirer, (the terrorist hugger and anti - semite enabler) you don't have a leg to stand on my dear when it comes to talking about inciting voilence. Your words are so hypocritcal its insane.

Joey i assure you it wasnt aimed at you at all,I havent been about that much, I try and keep out of here as much as possible ,but will comment on things I feel I agree with and I agreed with Jet, that was all.

It was Alf you agreed with Kaz, but you can agree with me anytime. :hee: :love:

:wavey:I did wonder if it was ,Alf, lol but We mostly agree on things Jet

"Blame ‘remoaners’"



Yes Slim
Some of them are Dirty Rotten Scoundrels

Aww, you almost understood what I was saying then, almost. Maybe it'll dawn on you next time. Not gonna hold my breath though.

No, don't hold your breath as I rarely read what you say anymore. I don't appreciate know -it - all, 'I'm always in the right' posts. :sleep:

Oh? You're gonna pretend not to read my posts? Oh, whatever will I do? How am I supposed to cope without the great and wonderful JET acknowledging my posts and giving my life meaning?! Oh Fates! Thoust are most cruel!

If you cheer on Boris' terminology, you are part of the problem. No ifs or buts about it. Such terminology has no place in politics, not when right wing extremists take such statements to heart and Right Wingers are more concerned with pointing fingers at the left instead of, you know, weeding out the extremists.

Can't disagree with any of that...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFlDkJTX...jpg&name=small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFlDkJTX...g&name=360x360

Another example of a hysterical language
"collusion "

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/375/cp...trop1sep30.jpg

So much for there being no threat of violence from the left

..the banner is the perfect example of the importance of words/terminology with the potential impact and dangers...with all parties though, there is a lack of self awareness, combined with huge personal egos...Boris Johnson’s mindset of its everyone else but not me because my language is fine, is not helping at all...