Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11002397)

he died before he could tho, andrew is alive

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11002404)

Yes, she lied about how she wasn't welcomed, when the family went out of their way (google how Meghan was made to feel special from the start compared to Kate or any other bride because she was in a new country) she lied about having no real family and her relationship with her father so that she wouldn't have to bring Harry to meet him and let the Palace aids help him when he was being harrassed by paps) - Harry in the radio interview "We will be the family she never had".

She lied about wanting to be part of the royal family and carry out her duties like the rest of them when they had been planning their escape even before they married.
She lied about how they didn't look after her enough during her pregnancy when she refused visits from Kate and William and Camilla, that nobody cared enough to ask her if she was okay.
She lied that she couldn't spend Xmas at Sandringham with Harry's family because Archie was to young to fly from Canada, then they jetted off with Archie to LA. There is lots more I'll think of after I post this...:laugh:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11002387)

I said there was photographic evidence that proves he's a liar which that photograph does in 2 ways, the first he said he'd never been upstairs in that house but the photograph with him in it was taken upstairs and the 2nd is that he said he'd never met that particular girl but there he is standing next to her

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11002417)

Can you provide actual evidence of any of this?

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 11002411)

I'm sure :D

Will have a look into this all later I think..as I said in one of these threads..never been that interested in monarchy stuff, but..this seems almost like a war! Thanks for the reply. Royal wiki :p

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11002417)

Can you provide actual evidence of any of this?

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11002421)

I'd like to know aswell but doubt we'll ever get a coherent answer :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 11002423)

"a close friend said"

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11002421)

I'd like to know aswell but doubt we'll ever get a coherent answer :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11002417)

Can you provide actual evidence of any of this?

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11002427)

Well dont then....if you dont agree with it then say so and present your own reasons as to why you think its a load of rubbish...its a debate not a court of justice.

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11002427)

Well dont then....if you dont agree with it then say so and present your own reasons as to why you think its a load of rubbish...its a debate not a court of justice.

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 11002435)

EXCEPT others aren't saying they KNOW what wrong Meghan Markle has done, because I'd say there's no wrong to find anyway in my view.

So it's down to those who claim to know and who are publicly without concrete facts, saying so too for sure she has done and said great wrong.
Then it's only for them to prove their claims.

Not for those, who are NOT in FACT accusing her of anything at all.

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11002452)

Bull****, that's not how debate works.

I'm telling of what I have seen, heard, read, and researched from long time reliable royal commentators. I don't have to prove anything. Anyone is welcome to do their own research and rebut what I post if they don't agree.
Those that like/admire her could do their research for balance and post their findings about her, but they don't.

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 11002435)

EXCEPT others aren't saying they KNOW what wrong Meghan Markle has done, because I'd say there's no wrong to find anyway in my view.

So it's down to those who claim to know and who are publicly without concrete facts, saying so too for sure she has done and said great wrong.
Then it's only for them to prove their claims.

Not for those, who are NOT in FACT accusing her of anything at all.

Originally Posted by Nicky91 (Post 11002455)

who are royal commentators in UK?


over here we got a few, more notably Marc van der Linden whom is a true royalty expert, mostly him when talking about royal news all across the world

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11002459)

He doesn’t have to prove anything....they are his facts and if people don’t want to believe it then it’s up to them...goading and ridiculing is all they can do in response. We were all having a decent chat on here until certain people join the thread...

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11002459)

He doesn’t have to prove anything....they are his facts and if people don’t want to believe it then it’s up to them...goading and ridiculing is all they can do in response. We were all having a decent chat on here until certain people join the thread...

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11002460)

So that’s a firm no on providing any evidence to back why you unnecessarily hate her so much?

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11002473)

I don't have to provide anything but my own findings and views. Get a grip. :joker:

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11002476)

When your findings come from the Daily Mail you can’t expect other people to fall for them as easily as you do.

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11002478)

I mean the FACT that they bleated on about privacy and the FACT they are doing a primtime expose access all areas 90 minute faux interview

The fact they bleated on about British tabloids taking them to court and then the FACT they released details of a pregnancy with a cloying picture to the Press Assocation so that all tabloids could run it and they did

these FACTS seem not to be counted

:joker: