user104658 |
01-10-2013 05:16 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesus.
(Post 6405043)
We have a fundamental but sincere disagreement. I view that he had no right to make decisions about her or her "condition".
You view that he can, but the employer can take action afterwards.
So did he provide the woman with an alternative bar tender? No, he refused to serve her and offered her no alternative.
Also, Doctors don't refuse care on moral grounds.
I'd also suggest that we agree to disagree here. Reply to this post if you see fit, but we're both going to go round in circles.
|
I agree that we're just going in circles, I don't think there's a misunderstanding just a fundamental disagreement so best to leave it at that :joker:.
... however, just for information's sake, it is possible for a patient to request a treatment if they have researched it for themselves and feel it is the right course of action for them, even if said treatment is "controversial", and individual doctors CAN refuse to provide that treatment if they disagree with it, and will refer the patient elsewhere.
You're right that he should have done that if at all possible, although it's possible he was the only staff member on duty. Better still, he could have moved away from the serving area and quietly asked another staff member to serve her, without informing her at all. However it does sound from the bar's reply, and indeed from the original story, like he might have been young and lacking in customer service experience... so, either way I feel like the pregnant woman has made a mountain out of a molehill here.
|