Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 7935765)

Was Brian asked to apologise for HIS part in starting the argument, for standing over Helen, for pointing at her face and shouting abuse at her as angrily as he possibly could, for calling her 'pure evil' a 'scumbag' etc etc and having to be physically restrained by other HMs for the THIRD time that week.

Was he asked to apologise for his verbal AND physical intimidation of her?

Of course not!

Why?

Because it's one rule for Helen and one rule for anyyone who hates Helen!

Brian can say or do what he likes and get away with it. Helen can't because she is the one we are all ALLOWED to hate: ENCOURAGED to hate in fact.

People can say what they like about Helen. They can abuse her and get applauded for it.

But Helen is not allowed to retalliate or say anything equally as bad about others and if she does - we are allowed and encouraged to hate her even more.

Helen is in a lose/lose scenario with the BB mainstream hate mob and that's how the hate mob like it - as hypocritical as possible.

Doesn't she know the completely one-sided rules by now?

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 7935934)

There's no need at all to get personal with me, I'm getting quite sick of it recently. You can disagree with others without being being rude and trying to belittle them.

Originally Posted by BB4fan (Post 7935496)

Brian threw shoes around and punched walls.

So you do condone certain behavior just as long as it's against Helen...???

Originally Posted by Petemitch (Post 7936117)

I so agree :clap1:

Hopefully now Hellen's gone the forum will become friendlier :/