'I didnt know much about him...'

Being 'debunked' by a picture of her outside Buckingham palace as a teen...
And her doing a blog post on kate once.

Well. If this is the extent of it..I am not understanding the anger! :laugh:

But thanks..this at least made me see where some are coming from..


Will also lookup other things jet said tonight ( :

Where was that? :laugh:

"they are taking back a bit of control for the sake of their mental health and their son"

really where did you learn this information from and how do you know its true?

and you believe her?

people don't like unearned success and privilege, doesn't matter who it is. They like it even less when the person comes over as superior and thinks they can tell others how they should live their lives. It's not hard to understand

Not sure really. But the 'evidence' that she lied about it..is rather flimsy I think :laugh:

Like, obviously she knew he was a Prince,but its not that much of a stretch to think she didn't know much beyond that.

That said, soooo many Americans seem very obsessed with the royals..seemingly more of them care than we do from what I have seen..have been dragged on facebook by an American friend once as I had said something negative about the Queen and it upset them,..and I was told I should be grateful to have her yadayadayada D:

like she pretended that only the UK has tabloids and an intrusive press..

she is fake af and has more faces than the townhall clock

just my opinion

time will tell..

EXCEPT they aren't facts.
I haven't seen anyone, take away the people who are maybe pro Meghan.
Even casual ones who can't see anything she's done wrong.
They haven't it would seem seen any facts from any of you who are just on almost every single thing, tearing that woman to shreds as to her integrity and all she says and does.

That's not debate, it's called character assassination.

What you've read in tabloids.
Most of which is exactly what you insulting call my post bull.....

It's why I won't waste my time even attempting to debate with you jet
And I'm very sorry to have to say that.
However I won't, as there's no point whatsoever in doing so in my own personal view.
Sorry.

Bet if Kate said she hardly knew anything about William before, you wouldn't have a problem hmm wonder why .

And why is Meghan lying? , she didn't know Harry personally until they started dating so how is she lying. If this isn't clutching at straws then I don't know what is .

And yes mental health is not a laughing matter , funny how the #bekind only applies to certain people .

I don't envy Harry & Meghan, they get hounded and tormented for every little thing it's tiresome really .

is that the same tabloids the happy couple supply information to?

as they did only on the last week

surely it cant be?

I don't go by tabloids to form my views.

...regardless of debate etc it does have to be proven when saying someone lied
because it’s a character damaging statement that could potentially be viewed as libellous...and open to that being laid...and it’s a good thing that there is protection against that for all of us so that someone would have to prove their words and statements..it’s not giving an opinion or any type of debate or saying ‘in my opinion’ or ‘I think that’ or ‘read that’ or whatever... it’s stating that someone is a liar and actually lied and of course that would always have to be proven because it’s being written as fact in public...

I nearly choked when she said that. Unbelievable!

hopefully this utterly fake 90-minute "promotion" with their "best pal" Oprah will reduce the media focus on them and we/they can finally focus on their philanthropic causes and climate change?

:fc:

It is tiresome Goldheart.

If it was rational debate and not largely quoting things like Daily Mail articles etc.
It could have some merit backed up by hard substantiated facts not just a formed opinion.

I have many formed opinions, I'd accept could be wrong, I have even had my mind and position changed from others, even on here in rational debate etc:

However, constant character assassination against any individual who hasn't done anything to warrant same.
I've no time for.

It says nothing about the person constantly and relentlessly got at.
While speaking volumes about the ones doing it.

Exactly
I don't even know what this debate is anymore

It didn't matter who they gave the picture to in all honesty though does it? You know as well as I do, they could have only given it to Royals Weekly (I know there isn't such a thing but you catch my drift?). The tabloids would have got hold of it and crucified them for not giving it to the British press. By providing it themselves, they have fulfilled their perceived obligation in providing the British public with the news of the pregnancy without a pap shot of Meghan's belly coupled woth speculation.

They said they wanted privacy to live their lives the way they want, releasing what they want. They never asked for media blackout. The press will run with what they want and as we discussed at the beginning of this thread, they don't really care about legal action so there is no way they will ever get all the privacy they crave but they have the right to launch legal action if they believe a line has been crossed

The tabloids chose to run it....they weren't obliged to but they do because they know Meghan and Harry = sales

I assume you are referring to a post of mine again. When someone asks why you think someone has told lies, you answer them with what you have heard and read, you don't always have to say 'I read that'..... I think they can work out for themselves that you weren't actually there personally to hear it with your own ears or see something with your own eyes.
You don't have to say 'In my opinion' either, it's obvious, or should be by now on a debate forum.
I think I am safe in the knowledge that I won't be arrested for libel.

they gave it to PA

with a cloying pic

cake

eat

it

...maybe you will feel safe but that really isn’t any justification for posting any potentially character damaging words...actually, I just googled and with those type of words, even with the presence of ‘my opinion’ or ‘I think’ or etc...it would still be open for libel being laid against...it’s fine that you say that you’re happy because that’s your own choice..but it doesn’t make what anyone else has requested in hoping for proof ...any less correct in expecting and hoping for that proof for those words, however they’re phrased...

I've just subscribed to royals weekly :smug:

...I’m subscribing to Royals Daily and I got a cheaper deal...you was robbed, guvna ...

You paid? :smug:

...you mean that you have enough money to know what payment actually is...?...if only...