Of course

New Young Lad he brought into the studio
after he met him aged 10....................................

Thanks for posting

They could have started a sexual relationship at 16 and it would still be no one’s business.

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/05...5173549260.jpg

Sure she knew
but what could she do?


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...elds-star.html

When hes been perving over him since he was ten I'm going to make it my business.

Gay predators don't get special compensation from me just because they are gay.

So he’s admitted to an unwise relationship with a younger man, apologised for lying, apologised for misleading his friends, his management and the daily mail (lol) he’s stepped down from all duties and been sacked by his management, still no proof that anything untoward happened before the guy was legal, yet he’s already faced more severe consequences for an affair than any average straight person has in my memory.

Of course. He’s having his say before the papers start telling the real story.

If this was all it was. He just let the papers print the story and let it blow over in a year.

[QUOTE=Gusto Brunt;11295097]I'm not fan of Schofield, but what's it gotta do with ITV if he has an affair with a guy over 18??

What's it any of their business??? It's only between Schofield and his wife.

ITV saying they're 'disappointed'. BUTT out (no pun intended ;) ) it's not of your business. :p


Would you still be saying that if it was a man & young girl relationship? .

Plus Schofield knew the guy from aged 10 ,you don't find that weird & groomer vibes??? .

At the very best he’s pre ordered a boy at the age of a 10.
But obviously it is so much worse and many many boys.

:umm2:

None of what’s happening is being done through choice
It’s all about saving themselves by moving the goalposts

People turning a blind eye to a dirty old man abusing his position of trust.

If Phil’s brother had not been caught, Phil would still be on this morning with holly lying away as usual.

it does seem that pressure was applied after his brother was convicted. My guess is that friends of Holly started saying to her .... you seriously didn't know? and that forced Holly to change her approach to him, otherwise it would have been business as usual

I think with his brother situation going on. The papers went into overdrive with the stories they wanted to print and so Phil couldn’t afford to super injunct them all.
Maybe he was going to let some of the lesser stories slip threw and Holly wasn’t having it. The deal between them was that he would keep the papers silent and she wasn’t having it.

If the claims made here are true, this could get a whole lot more serious:
https://twitter.com/kaihumphries/sta...31051166646287

You have no evidence or proof that Philip is a gay predator. Not sure what his sexuality has to do with it but then again it’s you were talking about.

Sounds to me like they had a consensual relationship, albeit behind his wife’s back. Unless he’s come forward and claimed that Philip groomed him of course?

The age of consent is 16. Bore off with your faux outrage because you’re too ignorant to see past his sexuality.

You’re on the wrong side.
I’d just be quiet given the tide and wait it out before commenting.
You’re going to be left very red faced once the truths all come out.

[QUOTE=GoldHeart;11295138]Yes I would. People are far too quick to get themselves involved in peoples lives.

The age of consent is 16. You can clutch your pearls all you want. If he consented it’s no one’s business.

Maybe everyone else should wait it out before making assumptions No?

Because maybe this 'affair' started when the guy was much younger...too young.

The fact of this is he lied. To his wife and family and also to his bosses when questioned. There's no coming back from that breach of trust from an employers point of view. I would bet plenty of stars have had affairs with much younger / older / same sex / opposite sex colleagues. ITVs stance is from a breach of trust viewpoint. Anything else would ve discriminatory but because he has lied when questioned he has provided them with a get out clause.

Because it’s obvious where this is going. No need to wait we already have all the dots.

Baseless theories don’t equal proof, building a narrative around something without any proof is bizarre

Interesting how many LGBTQs are defending him.

Glenn he's known the guy since he was a little minor! 10 years old .....You don't think that's weird and has groomer vibes ?? , Especially considering what his brother has been arrested for. If he's trained someone or offered them a job and known them all this time,then that's abuse of power. And I find it very questionable.

How would you feel if a babysitter had looked after someone since they were a little kid , and then started dating and sleeping with them as soon as they were 'legal' . Do you not question that entire relationship and the intentions??, It has dodgy written all over it.

It disgusting. And us gays wonder why people think we are perverted freaks