![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The jurors who found Michael Jackson not guilty in his 2005 trial agree with the FBI. Juror Paulina Coccoz said: ‘It was pretty obvious there was no molestation done...it was pretty obvious that there were ulterior motives on behalf of the family. And the mother, she orchestrated the whole thing..there wasn’t a shred of evidence’. Just because a story is graphic and disturbing doesn’t make it factual. Before you judge anything do your research. Facts don’t lie, people do. The bottom line is.. If you want to view Michael Jackson as a pedophile, you will. It’s easy to do. He admitted to allowing children to sleep in his bedroom (which itself is the same size as a small two story house) and has been accused of child molestation more then once. He’s not the guy next door, was undeniably eccentric, and most certainly didn’t live a conventional life. But to anyone who has bothered to look into the allegations against him - and I mean really look into them - there is more than enough evidence to demonstrate that he was a victim of extortion and of copycat false claims for the past twenty five years. Yet despite the Los Angeles Police Department stating that Jackson should be presumed to be innocent, despite a jury finding him not guilty on every single charge against him, despite the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services twice investigating and clearing him of wrongdoing, despite the FBI conducting a very thorough investigation in which no evidence of wrongdoing was found, and despite the cash grab lawsuits of his posthumous accusers being tossed out of court, the court of public opinion may sadly be what defines this saga and a large part of his legacy. |
In all honesty kaz, I feel you are answering as a fan rather than a mum. Whether he slept on the floor, in a twin bed or strapped to the roof, he was a grown man wanting to sleep in the same room / area / bed as a kid that he wasn't related to. Any way I look at that, its wrong......from the parents view, wtf, anyone asked that to me with my son regardless of the status, riches or whatever, just no....but MJ was an adult....he was wrong. Then after doing whatever, dropping them for a younger midel is sick, cruel etc etc
Ill tell you what, had it been my kid he'd ****ed with, death would be preferable...sexual or emotional abuse |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Along with the parents being ridiculous for continuing to allow their kids to sleep there, MJ was quite ridiculous for (if he just had endless false claims about him) keep allowing random children to sleep in his bed beside him. Surely. As for not being found guilty in a court, lets not pretend that sexual assault and such have a high conviction rate..hell even when there is a lot of physical proof the guilty tend to go free as its essentially made out to be 'his word against theirs'... He might well be innocent, but I don't think so. I still like his music, he was a hell of an artist. He might be an endless victim of false claims. Or, he might not be and the reason the claims all seem the same is because the same thing happened, again and again. Honestly, noone will ever know 'for sure' except those who were there at the time, meaning him, and the kids involved. No doubt more documentaries will come about...because the case, regardless of innocence or guilt, is so odd in so many bloody ways D: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As for "nothing you've seen tonight". Tbf, it's a carefully edited film designed to suit one agenda. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Given his money, legal team and advisors....why after the.first allegations and massive out of court settlement, did he not stop.....unless there was a "need" driving him???? |
Quote:
As I said, ****ing odd in many places this story. |
Quote:
|
Well, sorry but from watching this intently, I don't believe their accounts.
It strikes me the Parents were as strange as Michael Jackson. It seems the moment these two got seemingly pushed out for Macaulay and the other one. That is what is behind this storytelling now. Macaulay and the other guy have continuously insisted nothing sexual took place with them and Michael. I am with Kazanne on this. I think had these done a confrontational documentary being independently questioned as to all their accounts. I feel a lot of holes would appear in said accounts. I'm not a strong Jackson fan, I like most, not all of his music. I can't deny the history of pop would have a massive hole in it, without his input over the decades. I've listened to them, long and hard tonight on this.. I've seen no passion or disdain for what they claim was done to them. Sorry. I don't believe them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's hard for someone who has never been sexually abused to accuse some of lying about child sexual abuse.
I believe the victims at this stage, why wouldn't I? Perhaps their accounts aren't 100% accurate (but is anything ever 100% accurate when retold after 30 years...?) Macaulay Culkin and Corey Feldman have said nothing sexual happened to them... because perhaps it didn't? Just because he is an alleged abuser doesn't mean he abused everyone. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If you can't watch that and see two men not lying I'd suggest you are too young or blinded by fame
It's not complex In fact it's pretty obvious |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.