![]() |
Unfortunately, Scotland will fall on its arse without the UK
|
Quote:
|
I don't think Scotland would fall on its arse without the UK. I think we'd have to expect that there would be a lot of noticeable changes to begin with, perhaps our economy wouldn't be very strong while we worked out the finer details, but ultimately I think we've got more than enough established infrastructure to adapt to being a small, sustainable nation of 5-6 million people.
The more the Conservatives drive the country into the ground, the more I think we'd be better off as an independent country. I detest Alex Salmond and his ploys for attention but he's very good at what he does, you have to give him that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Scotland would be just fine not being part of the UK, they'd still have a very special relationship with England, obviously. Just like America and Canada are still very close, even though Canada is a separate country.
I'm sure Scotland and England could negotiate partnerships economically and militarily, just like The USA and Canada have partnerships like NAFTA and NORAD. |
Scotland would be very reliant on their oil if they did get become independent, and that's such an unstable market that it doesn't really offer that much economic security, the richest reserves of the oil have already been used
What happens with the likes of HBOS and RBS as well, who needed the British government to bail them out when they racked up such massive debts? Plus Britain is trusted as an important and secure economic power, an independent Scotland would miss out on that and find it harder Scotland being independent would only harm them economically imo, and most of the arguments for independence seem to mainly be based on emotional nationalism and resentment of the power and importance of London in the UK. I especially can't stand Salmond, seems to just have a big chip on his shoulder :idc: |
Scotland would also end up having conflicts like Ireland if it were to go Independent, The Unionists in Scotland would team up with the Unionist in Northern Ireland and they would drive the Nationalists into the sea and then we would eventually have peace so this could be a good thing
|
Quote:
oil is an unstable market?? lol, no, actually having a resources based economy is very stable. the only reason Canada and Australia did so well compared to the rest of the world from the 2008 financial crisis is because they both have resources based economies. Scotland would have actually been better off not being so deeply connected to the London financial system. |
Quote:
I also think Scotland has had some very raw deals from UK Govts. of both main parties, often being the experimental area for unsavoury policies. |
Quote:
http://www.economist.com/node/21552564 |
If they vote for independence , then I believe they will be better off for it. A richer Scotland will help the rest of the Uk as we wil continue to trade with them as much as ever.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I don't want Scotland to be independent.
I can think of a few reasons, possible negative consequences or unanswered questions. Would there be an open border with England? Would you need a passport to cross the border? Would companies be allowed to trade freely with England? Would Scottish people be able to work or be educated at university freely in England or would there be restrictions? Would Scotland have its own currency and central bank which would set interest rates? Would Scotland be able to defend itself? What would happen to broadcasting - would we still get the BBC? Above all, the question I would ask is, What is so bad about Britain? I also think it is a mistake for some to believe that if Scotland was independent it would always have a left or centre-left government just because of the parties it votes for now. The whole political landscape would change and Scotland would be making its own decisions on a range of other issues which could change the way people vote. |
Quote:
Would Scotland be able to defend itself? from who? or what? Scotland is still on the same island, so of course England would never allow a foreign country to invade Scotland, because it would be just as much a threat to England. |
Quote:
|
Joining the EU can be a very lengthy process because the requirements for entry have changed since the UK joined; Scotland would need to meet a lot of criteria in order to accede to union membership. It might not take as long as it has done for the likes of Croatia but it could be a number of years away.
|
'What would happen to broadcasting - would we still get the BBC?' I've add that one to my list of questions.
|
Quote:
You guys make it sound like all of a sudden there would be this hard border between countries, i don't think either country wants that. It will be like travel between Northern Ireland(UK) and the Republic of Ireland. |
Initially yes. But if Scotland adopted a more open immigration policy, for example, it could lead to a closed border. Or different duties and taxes on things could lead to more restrictions to stop smuggling.
|
Quote:
Yes via Sky |
Emperor Salmond receives the Ambassador from North America
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.