Ben Shapiro putting his boring 2 cents in , why am I not surprised :sleep: .

You can just look at the first post on page 5.

And the whole dismissing the suicide situation and plus making out Harry can't really talk about mental health because he's rich.

Please tell me she didnt say that..:laugh:

Hes not wrong..

Interesting you don't think that's taken out of context,but you think the comment about Archie's skin colour is ?.

They accepted that no help was coming from the Royal family so took themselves out of the royal family. That’s what they did. There was no grand scheme. It was done for their own sanity.

I'm not a fan of Charles, but in all honesty I would have stopped taking his calls as well for my own sanity

I think Megs wanted the Diana narrative, she will never be the People's Princess unfortunately, far too self absorbed, Diana had a natural affinity with the people she interacted with and didn't choose projects that were safe

Let’s hope Meghan gets some help she desperately needs because she is clearly not right in the head.

After all she is desperately ill with her mental health

I dont like her...shes a proven liar and I take everything she says with a pinch of salt. Shes accusing her husbands family of Racism over one comment that 'could' have been taken well out of context.
My family was torn apart by a sister-in-law who was intent on breaking up my family closeness. There are people who love to twist things and over exaggerate to cause problems....
I dont know why Meghan and Harry have done this...I dont know what they have gained from it apart from a lot of hurt that may never be forgiven.
They need to name who said what they claimed to have said so they can defend or explain themselves... we all suspect 1 of 4 people..how fair is that on the 3 that didnt say it. Its manipulating and intentional and very devious.

Fight the POWER
 

I find it hard to believe that any family member would use the word 'concern' in front of Harry...maybe they were 'curious' rather than concerned and its been taken out of context...
Which is why they need to name the person so they have the chance to defend to claim...otherwise its just their interpretation.

Given they were speaking directly to Harry, it's hard to believe they wanted to intentionally offend him

One of the more bizarre moments of the Oprah interview is when Meghan compares herself to the Little Mermaid – a fairy tale character who marries a prince then loses her voice, but finally emerges victorious and regains the power of speech. But the Disneyesque-fantasy for us mere viewers is destroyed. Meghan pulls back the curtain too far and reveals too much.

:umm2:

Yes that's how I see it nothing malicious ,IF it was said it was probably just , someone's curiosity of what colour he would be, and really IF they are telling all they need to name names otherwise they are just fuelling speculation and that wont be good, it could have been a minor royal, but it will be left to peoples imaginations.:wavey:

i quite believe someone said something inappropriate about Archie, but to take offence every time someone close says something a bit iffy, it's no wonder their world ended with the negativity of the press. The better person would have challenged and corrected or simply let it go rather than saying the world is against them. It's so out of proportion compared to what the average person has to deal with every day. If that interview was the real extent of their gripe, they are nothing more than spoilt brats

Naming the person does nothing , non of us were there to hear how this went down .

I just don't understand what the concern would be over the colour of a baby's skin , Harry is a white ginger man and Meghan is a mixed race woman. What did they think the baby would look like?? :rolleyes: .

Whether the intention was to offend or not, the have taken offence. Whether it was well intentioned or not, its irrelevant. I do however agree that they should have either named who said it or not mentioned it at all as it has just fuelled speculation and rumour which is how the problems with the media begin.

Not being racist how WOKE is that

Piers absolutely nails it and is in tune with the GBP with his
latest hard-hitting article

Never have I watched a more repulsively disingenuous interview.

Nor one more horrendously hypocritical or contradictory.

They told of their constant trauma from nasty newspaper stories, but repeatedly insisted they never read any of them.

They claimed they were forced to sign gazillion-dollar deals with Netflix and Spotify
because Prince Charles cut off their allowance, despite Harry inheriting millions from his
late mother Princess Diana and having his entire life bankrolled by the Royal Family.

And so, it went nauseatingly on.

Meghan even compared her former life living in a palace to the crippling freedom-
robbing existence of coronavirus lockdowns, which must have sounded so empathetic to
large families living at the top of tower blocks with three kids they're trying to home-
school and no job to pay for food.

'I couldn't even meet my friends for lunch!' wailed the Duchess of Delusion, who flew to
New York for a $500,000 baby shower with all her new-found celebrity pals, then flew
back to London like any good eco-warrior on George Clooney's carbon footprint
guzzling private jet.

First, Meghan claimed to have been left suicidal by the pressure of being a Princess and
had her requests for help rejected by the cold, heartless Palace.

We weren't told who did the rejecting, or why she couldn't seek her own therapy or
treatment if that's what she felt she needed. After all, her husband has spent years
talking about mental health and has close connections with all the major mental health
charities.

From the moment Oprah announced her scoop, I predicted to anyone who asked me
that Meghan would aggressively play the mental health and race cards to deflect from
any criticism of herself and her own behaviour or accountability.

When it comes to mental health and having a heart, it appears Meghan and Harry only care about themselves.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...er_dailymailUK


:clap1:

But I don't think naming the person would of gone in their favour either . And someone being ignorant about a baby's skin colour shouldn't be ignored either .

Aye, how horrible of them to get offended about concerns over their child’s skin colour, absolute monsters the pair of them

:facepalm:....the Theatrics...:laugh:

:clap1: racists gonna racist I guess