What's the problem?

Can’t wait for trans men to cause a stir in the their ‘biological’ toilet.

So long as they don't have a cock I'd be fine with them.

They are more than welcome, don't hear much from trans men at any rate, its all about the transwomen...

You mean a woman in a womans toilet.

But with beards

Even more butch lesbians being harassed by workers for not being feminine enough for their standards of women

I have to laugh, suddenly they care about lesbians, though they had no issue with lesbians being called transphobes if they didn't fancy having it off with a transwoman...dear me

Does every transman have a beard :think:

No but a LOT will

The hilarity of “does every trans man” though when trans women are all tarred with the same brush as a few wrong’uns

I’ll never understand heteros

At least they will feel more comfortable doing a sit down pee, and a little less embarrassed.

That’s after they get a pass from the weirdo genital police at the door.

Asking for birth certificate or passport is pointless for many as these get changed when you get a GRC.

The transman point.. the supreme court covered that in their guidance, if a female has taken steps to look sufficiently masculine they can be banned from female areas.

I can't seem transmen kicking up a fuss though tbh. They grew up female, they know how female people think..they won't want to potentially scare people, I imagine passing transmen will continue using male areas

Interesting that suddenly we are hearing about transmen though. Usually they are totally forgotten

I mean.. a beard doesn't make someone a man so that would be fine to me. It'd be like washing my hands next to a woman with crazy overgrown armpit hair. It stands out but not offensive or anything.

They're still women technically so they're socialized as such. For women, socialization is much more key and we rely on that to adapt on average than men. I knew a transman from high school who was a bestie and they still at heart had female thinking and boundaries well ingrained... it's not like they lost that? A man looking to cause trouble doesn't know good behavior and will openly try to dominate as such. Sorry, I have history with harassment to that level like so many women, so know what men are more willing to do in private and they're not wallflowers as such as they get something out of intimidating targets. There is a reason to have a visceral reaction to the relaxing of the boundary that allows biomen into those space, but transmen are not even a thought for me. In fact, I think they would more understand the differences in that make this a crossing of lines for many women.

The level of threat and insidious need to dominate that one can experience from a man is not based on appearance or other hidden differences but rather behavior that is biologically ingrained to be predatory that no hormone pill or surgery can hope to remove if it is there.

I have yet to see any biological woman (trans or not) try to emulate these deeply ingrained male instincts. Not only is that not socially desirable but women by their nature tend to be highly socialized. I don't think you really can emulate strongly adapted biological instincts to that deep of a level and that is a very big one to try... it certainly couldn't be pilled in. And it's those characteristics that we don't want anywhere near any aspect of private female social life.

Am in Cambridge on the way back now while waiting for my friend to arrive popped into Cafe Nero opposite the station the one lockable cubicle is now unisex with a separate disabled toilet next door...no drama just amused me that men had to queue like women have for years lol

It wasn't like this when I last visited so you can thank trans women for your queue gents ��

Again I'll say the simplest solution would be for the two toilets to be for:
(cis) Women
Everyone Else

Same for sport

LOVE this for women. What a win :love::love: It's such a leap forward that some women may now have to prove their biological sex when they want to take a pee. :dance:

what an odd attitude :conf:

It's almost like it's not about biological sex being important in the slightest then.

Anyone supporting this ruling should have a major issue with the above caveat and if you don't, it shows you don't care about women or biological sex at all, you just hate trans people.

Irrespective of the hypocrisy, who decides what is 'sufficiently masculine' and why are we letting other people decide define what passes as woman or man on the basis of appearance. ****ing archaic.

Just because you don't understand something it doesn't make it odd. Hope that helps.

Well I don't understand Pakistani grooming gangs

for a kick off

do you want me to continue?

:conf:

Sometimes people think things odd because they don't understand it. Sometimes people think things are odd because they are odd. :shrug:

That was my words not the court. The sufficiently masculine part.

It makes sense to me. It's about biological sex but if someone has taken steps to be perceived as male then yes they will cause distress to others on a female only space.

But basically 'but transmen' is not an argument