In Tomorrows Paper
back in 2021 a young man died,
from the Vaccine.

But it was the wrong type
as at that time under 30's did not get
the Astra Zannecca.

And the vaccine was due to expire,
so they wanted to inject more fast.


This was a Massive Error
by the NHS at that time


Debated on Headliners
One Hour Newspaper review.
GBnewsHD

Live 11PM
then again 2AM and 5AM

That's tragic news.

But unfortunately I'm not surprised, the Vaccines were rushed out after all, so there's bound to be some negative side effects to some of them.

Another hypocrite I see.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GYOCFXRX...jpg&name=small

UK 5 years on the Covid-19

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/l...766cff3329.png

We must never forget what a total con it was

Yes, but young folks also died
No Vaccine at the Start LT

How did China escape it being called the Chinese flu?

We must never forget where it started.

Of course.

Young people die of respiratory viruses every year


Also this from the National Library of Medicine:

To conclude, this research letter found that deaths among young people in
England increased significantly (95 % CIs) in numerous weeks after COVID-19
vaccination compared to the first week. Based on the findings, I recommend
cautiousness concerning further COVID-19 vaccination, particularly among
young people, till we know more about underlying causes, e.g., vaccination type
or specific batches.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11382299/

Well... it's not a form of flu, for one...

Trump knew

The Chinese virus then? Is that okay?

I was making an attempt to equate it with the Asian flu and the Spanish flu, both of which were pandemics... but I might have known you'd leap in with a correction.

Yes, but During the Start of Covid -19
fit folks died
I know of a few that sadly died

All because there was no vaccine
at the start.


I am not referring to those that were ill at the time,

Yes Trump was Correct
it was the Chinese Virus



100%
Tragic Good Doctors in China died
even before it was worldwide

You really did go fully down the flat-earther vaccine denial route at some point eh.

All viable and reputable research shows that while vaccination wasn't as effective as hoped at fully halting the spread of Covid, it did (and still does) reduce the inflammatory immune response upon contracting Covid (meaning less severe illness, hospitalisation and death) and it reduced transmission rates.

please stop spouting MSM drivel

Overall, there is no convincing evidence that the COVID-19 vaccination
significantly reduces the risk to transmit SARS-CoV-2 to others.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39283431/

QB isn't talking about transmission, he is talking about minimising effects on your own body and please stop spouting MSM on every bloody post it means nothing

maybe you should stop watching the MSM bots as its shows in what you post

:umm2:

although your volte face on Trump is still a mystery

BBC News Text:
[ "A former spy chief submitted a secret dossier
to No 10 early in the pandemic reporting
that the virus had originated
with a leak from a Wuhan facility".]



https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standar...dc6e5.jpg.webp

The hilarious thing is, because you're spouting drivel with no actual ability to digest and understand a scientific paper, you blatantly don't understand what that abstract says. It notes the benefits of vaccination multiple times - including reasons that virus transmission is lessened in vaccinated populations. The part that you're quoting refers, specifically, to the likelihood of transmission of Covid from one person (vaccinated or otherwise is irrelevant) to another person (unvaccinated) during the infectious period (which is lessened by vaccination; you're just as infectious, but for less time, so fewer opportunities for transmission, though that part is inconclusive).

The abstract SPECIFICALLY talks about these things. On the link that YOU posted and cherry-picked a line from. Clown world.

Levels of infectious SARS-CoV-2 were partly lower in the vaccinated population. Viral loads were mostly lower in re-infections compared to breakthrough infections. Viral clearance including the detection of infectious virus has mostly been described to be faster in the vaccinated population suggesting a shorter duration as a possible source for transmission. The epidemiological relevance of this finding remains uncertain. Approximately half of the transmission studies found lower secondary attack rates from the fully vaccinated population, but the results are probably best explained by the vaccination status of the contact population.

Reading comprehension 3/10 LT, either that or you didn't bother to read the whole abstract.

Buit wait

The MSM said it didn't

surely they don't lie to us??

Its a Viewpoint

LT stop posting the
same text.

You are like a poxy robot
doing that