![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There shouldn't be a need for a separation between "men campaigning against violence against men" and "women campaigning against violence against women" because the aim is supposed to be a fundamental understanding that it makes no difference who is being abused or by whom, because no individual should be being abused, full stop. Suggesting that there need to be different campaigns is a statement that they are different issues. The suggestion that they are different issues is a clear message that "men and women are different, men's rights and women's rights are different things"... And that mindset is the opposite of one that seeks true equality. I guess the reason that I struggle with this entire concept is that I'm individualist to the bone. I don't care if you're male or female, I don't care if I'm male or female, I refuse to categorise individuals on arbitrary attributes for any reason. Being born with male chromosomes doesn't mean that I automatically joined "the men's team" at birth, and likewise, I refuse to be essentially FORCED into legitimising "the women's team". |
It means your a femme girly girl but sometimes there's rude guys who are masc 4 masc only and it's so anti-feministic!
|
Quote:
The men who are insensitive and harsh probably haven't experienced it . Or they'll probably just run away from their partners and decided to forget about it . They need more awareness and support, it's like male suicide . It feels like that's only recently being acknowledged and they say more men are taking their own lives . |
Quote:
There's a reason that these organised movements don't really exist and it's not because people haven't tried to start them. The reason is, as above, division and tribalism. A united anti-abuse campaign would be taken more seriously by the "out there" element, both male and female, than the segregated campaigns which only generate backlash. And you can say "yes but only backlash from the idiots who think it's OK!" ... But who exactly are these campaigns trying to reach? Precisely those idiots! If they only reach the non-idiots who already understand that abuse is never justified, then they are pointless, preaching to the choir, and little more than exercises in self-congratulation. Which tbqfh sort of sums up current feminism. The only people really listening and engaging are those who already define themselves as feminists, or those like me (and others on here) who don't identify with the feminism brand but nonetheless do support equality. What's the point in that, exactly? |
To me feminism is no longer is it ok for a man to say 'women belong in the kitchen' ..
Its ok for me to hold a door open for others Its ok for me to pay for a meal for two Its ok for me to get the drinks in Its ok for me to be a car mechanic or any other 'mostly for men employments' if I want to (apart from sperm donor as honestly that's the one thing I cant do..) Its ok for me to not to be treated like a piece of meat and to speak up if I feel the need to stand up for myself without someone thinking Im on my period! ^ to name but a few |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have no problem with genuine feminism ,which supports equality for both . |
Quote:
Which tbqfh sort of sums up current feminism Self congratulation? |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm actually leaving this discussion now because it just winds me up tbh |
Meanwhile The Truth is rolling around his flat foaming at the mouth
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Basically... Being frustrated and wound up by the discussion in itself proves the point :shrug:. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.