Niamh who abused you over Sam ?

I’ve read it though. It doesn’t seem like the sort of place to post that I would enjoy. I’lL occasionally go in and post my opinion, but there are some threads that I will see the title of and just know that the posts within it are going to make me angry, so I don’t go in. I do the same with Daily Mail articles.

Yes you are right, or they are told that opinion is made up because of a general dislike of the other person and they truely don't believe in the point they are making, or they are told the place was better when they were banned, none of those people have made any ban list recently. If you feel its a witch hunt that is your opinion, but it is far from it, we need consistency and a fair hand for everyone that is all.

What do you mean?

Dezzy said you got abuse from members over Sam ,I was wondering who abused you, I can PM you if you wish " One example of this involves Niamh, when SamPVT was on the forum, she would get tirades of abuse any time he got infracted "

There you go again, dismissing my right to have my own opinion because I'm a relatively new member (four months and counting). And this paranoid belief I'm a returning member :laugh: - another fabricated reason to undermine my opinion.
Bullying disguised as self-righteousness.

Oh no not from other members from Sam himself (before he was perma banned obviously) saying that I disliked him because he was Protestant and alot of weird stuff :laugh:

My bad, I meant she got abuse from Sam himself.

Thanks for clearing that up

In a nutshell Cherie,I have no problem with rules as long as it applies to us ALL.

Honestly, I think the best solution for SDs would be have none of the current mods moderate it, get 2 or 3 new mods that nobody knows who they are to look after it. I'd be happy to stand down to make space for them aswell. I'm so tired of all this agro

Just remember a lot of responses were deleted ,if they hadn't been you may understand the problem more.

Whatever.... I'm not the only one who recognises your style.

I don't believe in that narrative either. Mysterious groundswell of discontent mysteriously centering on one mod.
From what I see most people have no problem whatsoever with mods here, Dezzy included. But there's a group of, what, 10 at a push, that share most of their views on everything, but especially on gettin rid of Dezzy.

I agree ,and if a mod comments in there they can get infracted and banned the same as members

And NO WAY are you standing down young lady, you are a fair and honest mod on here and this place needs people like you ,you are liked by everyone, Ive never heard of anyone who has a gripe about you

:clap1:

I'd be totally fine with that too tbh

who else does? do tell
and who am I supposed to be? share that with all, stop beating about the bush
once that's out in the open maybe we can devise a verification so that we can prove how foolish this accusation is :laugh:

You have no idea of the real problem, nor of the number of people who share my opinion. So your views are meaningless to me.

Not sure I could have given such a sweeping opinion of a huge problem on the forum when I'd only been here 4 months.

This thread is not about you.

It would make mods who choose to comment in there think twice before posting what they are posting at the minute behind the armour of a mod badge

Sweeping comments were made about people when he/she had less than 100 posts

Back on topic . Im so glad things are getting thrashed out, it needed doing a long time ago

So you’re suggesting that the mods you don’t like are banned from the entire section basically?

meaningless of inconvenient? if there were meaningless you'd not engage discussing with me

4 months is plenty; I bet 4 days would be enough, the attacks on Dezzy are very regular and predictable

I don't think that's what she's suggesting at all tbf, she's saying that mods could be infracted in there.