‘Because of what they have read and heard’

:facepalm:

From reliable sources....do you go through life not watching the news or reading papers and reports. Have you never ever based comments on here based on what you have read/googled?...because you will be lying.

As a serious question... What negative things exactly have you seen/read about Megan Markle (or her and Harry's relationship) that wasn't in either a tabloid or a gossip magazine?

Documentaries...news reports. I don’t read newspapers and magazines.

'The sun said Meghan spat at her dad'
'The daily fail said meghan locks harry in a cage at night'
'moon faced dan wootton said Meghan started covid'

and people such as yourself eat it up like a cake. it's so sad.

Everyone bases their opinions based on media / how they come across. You have done it, we all do it. Whether it be social media, whether it be The news or stories. Just because you don’t agree with some things doesn’t mean others don’t. It’s not eating stuff up like a cake. It’s the same with even big brother we only see edited highlights, it’s not 24/7, yet we all make our judgements and opinions despite it being edited and probably not portraying everything exactly. You still dislike housemates as do others without knowing them :shrug:

The fact there is so much drama around Meghan and her relations with her family and friends has shown she is involved In drama

did you see the patronising video from their 20 million quid mansion\?

what an odious pair of plonkers

:rolleyes:

We all form our opinions and impressions from what we read, hear and see, and my opinions are educated ones, FYI.
If you are interested in the Royals, as I am, you read what people who have been around them have to say. There are Royal correspondents and royal reporters who have known Harry since he was a little boy, have accompanied him on tours all over the world, have drank with him at the end of the day in bars, when he let his hair down. There are his Royal biographers like Penny Junor who have interviewed him in depth and have been allowed to follow him in his work for months on end.
Royal reporter Arthur Edwards adored Harry, their families holidayed together, and he cried on screen when Harry announced he was leaving the UK, He loved Harry like a son and Harry called him Uncle Arhur.

They know Harry. They say how caring he is, how sensitive and emotional and humble he is. How much fun he is, the pranks they played on each other. How he lived and breathed his army charities like the one for wounded veterans and how important his army pals were to him.
That’s all gone now and he has no meaningful work or friends to replace them.

I have read the official Harry biographies like I read nearly all Royal biographies. So I have my own impressions too of what he is like.
If these people who know him better than you or I; think he isn’t the happy person he was, that LA and Harry is as far from a good match as you can get and are concerned, they are worth listening to.

If William cautioned Harry about rushing into marriage with Meghan (which he did and that is what caused the rift between them) that is worth a thought as to why.
I have always liked Harry a lot, and yes, I am worried for him.
Yes, nobody know him like he knows himself, but we can still form educated impressions and have a right to express them.

Well why don’t you read my previous post and see what I base my information on.
It’s people like you who don’t read things properly before jumping in feet first and making stupid accusations.

If you read the whole thread you will see that no one has stated any of those ridiculous accusations....only the more believable ones.

You seem jealous of their success

when they achieve some be sure to let the group know

Don't insult Rusticgals intelligence with such stupid examples of headlines that you state she 'would eat up like cake'.

Disgusting post.

Shock....not :laugh:

They try hard to stay relevant by jumping on the latest bandwagon. Poor Harry could hardly get a minute to speak before she was off on her soapbox again with her LA'isms.

No he's not, he's stating people like Jet pretending they know strangers because they read a few sentences by unnamed "sources" and for some strange reasons believe they know Harry better than he knows himself, despite having never even met the man is stupid.

Because... it is stupid.

Yes, calling someone's bullsh*t assumptions about a stranger... bullsh*t means they think that stranger is "perfect".

Watertight logic that one.

Ikr, they should have stayed in... that other mansion... paid for by taxpayers... you know like the "independent" Kate and Wills.

she gave him such a look the poor boy is totally in her control. very worrying..

‘He won’t feel comfortable around rich and famous people in LA’ is my personal favourite assumption in this thread, like he was among commoners in his circles here

I've named some sources upthread from people who HAVE met the man. But as usual you ignore and carry on with your mind numbing no - substance nonsense regardless.
You posts are like a broken record, repeat, repeat, repeat.

Sorry, love, I didn't ask for a repeat of your rubbish. x

:joker: Ikr.

Joe Bloggs being seduced by the rich famous woman.

It’s pretty obvious Jet is well versed on the Royals....he has it seems a better insight than you or I have. If you are well versed on something or someone you probably do feel you know someone even though you haven’t met them.

Nothing strange about that at all...and it’s certainly not stupid.

It's pretty obvious Jet feels that way.

Reading every Daily Mail article that comes out about her whenever she breathes or walks the dog is not "pretty well versed" on anything to anyone with common sense.

Tinseltown Rich and famous are a different breed....