ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Supreme Court Ruling on "Woman" Definition [backs 'biological' definition of woman] (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=396539)

BBXX 22-05-2025 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 11650338)
That was my words not the court. The sufficiently masculine part.

It makes sense to me. It's about biological sex but if someone has taken steps to be perceived as male then yes they will cause distress to others on a female only space.

But basically 'but transmen' is not an argument

But what about the Trans Men you view as biological women? Do those biological women not count?

You're advocating for cis women not to share spaces with biological men while at the same time happy that some Trans men (who you happily call female because you see them as women) are sharing space with biological men.

So really, your care for biological sex only extends so far, meaning it's not about biological sex at all and moreover, your care for biological women only extends to cis biological women and so you don't really care about biological women at all. You just don't like trans women and you don't care about trans men.

Vicky. 22-05-2025 06:49 PM

Transmen are biological women. I would have thought the court giving an answer to that would be a good thing. After all, now no cis men can enter female only spaces by pretending to be transmen. Which was apparently concerning to people.

Vicky. 22-05-2025 06:50 PM

Also men are not as much in need of single sex spaces. If they are then I guess it's up to them to complain and such.

Liam- 22-05-2025 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBXX (Post 11650323)
It's almost like it's not about biological sex being important in the slightest then.

Anyone supporting this ruling should have a major issue with the above caveat and if you don't, it shows you don't care about women or biological sex at all, you just hate trans people.

Irrespective of the hypocrisy, who decides what is 'sufficiently masculine' and why are we letting other people decide define what passes as woman or man on the basis of appearance. ****ing archaic.

At least people are finally being honest about it now, even though this was the obvious truth from the very beginning

BBXX 22-05-2025 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 11650341)
Transmen are biological women. I would have thought the court giving an answer to that would be a good thing. After all, now no cis men can enter female only spaces by pretending to be transmen. Which was apparently concerning to people.

Yes, that's great. Fantastic news. And it's great news that Trans Men get to use the male facilities. It's what I was advocating for the whole time.

I just find it so interesting that your whole argument has been biological women shouldn't be sharing spaces with biological men, and yet you're okay with trans men using the male facilities... am I on glue, or is that not also biological women and biological men sharing a space?

Can you explain something for me as to why one is okay and the other isn't?

BBXX 22-05-2025 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 11650343)
Also men are not as much in need of single sex spaces. If they are then I guess it's up to them to complain and such.

It's not really about men being unsafe. It's about sending trans women into male spaces for men to kick the **** in to them, to be blunt.

BBXX 22-05-2025 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 11650345)
At least people are finally being honest about it now, even though this was the obvious truth from the very beginning

I don't really think they're even being honest, I think they're tripping up over their own hypocrisy.

Livia 22-05-2025 07:03 PM

Trans women suggested we use disabled toilets if we didn't like them in women's toilets. I suggest they take their own advice.

Cherie 22-05-2025 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 11650354)
Trans women suggested we use disabled toilets if we didn't like them in women's toilets. I suggest they take their own advice.

Indeed and as I indicated earlier establishments have already taken steps by turning single toilets into unisex also as has been said on numerous occasions toilets are a distraction technique...refuges sports jobs all much more important but don't let that get in the way of 'worrying' about peeing

Crimson Dynamo 22-05-2025 07:07 PM

Thankfully women and girls will now be able to feel safe again

that is progress

Cherie 22-05-2025 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBXX (Post 11650349)
It's not really about men being unsafe. It's about sending trans women into male spaces for men to kick the **** in to them, to be blunt.

Have you evidence of that happening since the ruling?

Vicky. 22-05-2025 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBXX (Post 11650348)
Yes, that's great. Fantastic news. And it's great news that Trans Men get to use the male facilities. It's what I was advocating for the whole time.

I just find it so interesting that your whole argument has been biological women shouldn't be sharing spaces with biological men, and yet you're okay with trans men using the male facilities... am I on glue, or is that not also biological women and biological men sharing a space?

Can you explain something for me as to why one is okay and the other isn't?

Because women need space away from male people in certain circumstances. Due to (some) mens treatment of women and just..privacy reasons. If men are concerned about single sex spaces then they can lobby and such

BBXX 22-05-2025 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11650360)
Have you evidence of that happening since the ruling?

I haven't looked, but you cannot ignore the fact trans women are 4x more likely to be a victim of violence than cis gender people. Do you really honestly think a trans woman is safer in the male changing rooms than the female ones? Are cis women really that violent?

BBXX 22-05-2025 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 11650362)
Because women need space away from male people in certain circumstances. Due to (some) mens treatment of women and just..privacy reasons. If men are concerned about single sex spaces then they can lobby and such

What about the trans men, who you call females and biological women? You seem happy for them to share spaces with biological men? I thought women needed space away from men? I'm confused.

Vicky. 22-05-2025 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBXX (Post 11650364)
What about the trans men, who you call females and biological women? You seem happy for them to share spaces with biological men? I thought women needed space away from men? I'm confused.

I do not care if transmen want to use male spaces. That's up to them and the males.

BBXX 22-05-2025 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 11650366)
I do not care if transmen want to use male spaces. That's up to them and the males.

You called them female before, that's all. And then biological women. And I was just confused why you don't care about that subsection of "females/biological women" sharing spaces with biological men and only the cis biological women. But nevermind, I digress...

Vicky. 22-05-2025 07:32 PM

It's transmens choice if they wish to use male spaces imo. Unless men complain about that, in which case a discussion needs to be had (not #nodebate stonewall)

Crimson Dynamo 22-05-2025 07:43 PM

:clap1:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Grfvd8EX...jpg&name=small

Livia 22-05-2025 07:44 PM

There is no such thing as cis women.

Women
Trans women
Men
Trans men

I do not need a title imposed on me for the benefit of a tiny subsection of society.

Livia 22-05-2025 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo (Post 11650369)

It's not difficult to grasp, is it.

bots 22-05-2025 07:47 PM

how many cases have there been reported about men feeling threatened by a trans man using their toilet? Surely it was a big issue prior to this ruling?

Beso 22-05-2025 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBXX (Post 11650363)
I haven't looked, but you cannot ignore the fact trans women are 4x more likely to be a victim of violence than cis gender people. Do you really honestly think a trans woman is safer in the male changing rooms than the female ones? Are cis women really that violent?

Do you have any stats on how likely they are to commit sexual violence towards female children than a woman is?

Crimson Dynamo 22-05-2025 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beso (Post 11650375)
Do you have any stats on how likely they are to commit sexual violence towards female children than a woman is?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce39v5k0gx2o.amp

BBXX 22-05-2025 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 11650368)
It's transmens choice if they wish to use male spaces imo. Unless men complain about that, in which case a discussion needs to be had (not #nodebate stonewall)

Okay cool. But you’re fine with them using women’s spaces too, if they want to?

BBXX 22-05-2025 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 11650370)
There is no such thing as cis women.

Women
Trans women
Men
Trans men

I do not need a title imposed on me for the benefit of a tiny subsection of society.

Nobody is forcing you to use it. Cis is an adjective that has been used for a long, long time. If you want to not use words that fine. If you don’t wish to be called it, that’s also fine and I won’t call you specifically a cis woman, but you don’t get deny words just because they trigger you.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.