Really? Examples?

How would you know unless it is posted in the thread and I can't see it

:smug:

The only time posts were removed that I can recall was when you implied that the author of an article with pics of Prince Louis since babyhood to the present day may be somehow paedophile - ish?
The conversation was, why would your mind even go there?

That would hardly qualify as ‘anything less than fawning’.

The mods would not have removed the posts if they had been fine with them.

Stop all this Locking Threads up wishing
you trouble maker

Back to the topic....
There are other reports out there...this article is from March 2021

https://metro.co.uk/2021/03/04/megha...-row-14188561/

Meghan ‘hissed at staff member and reduced her to tears’ in row on Fiji visit
Siba Jackson
Thursday 4 Mar 2021

Meghan Markle is said to have reduced a staff member to tears after ‘turning and hissing at her’ during a row on a visit to Fiji.
The Duchess of Sussex, 39, was reportedly ‘incandescent with rage’ and ‘demanded to leave’ a market tour on the Pacific island in October 2018, reports claim.
Meghan, who was pregnant with son Archie at the time, was swept away by her entourage, amid apparent concerns about the humidity and large crowds in attendance.
Lawyers have denied claims in The Times that she cut short the visit over worries about the presence of a UN organisation promoting women, with whom she previously worked with but no longer wished to be associated with……..

The Duchess and Prince Harry were on a 16-day Royal tour of Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Tonga at the time of the alleged row at Suva Market, in the Fijian capital.
The Daily Mail’s royal editor Rebecca English, who attended the Fiji market trip, claimed: ‘I was there at the time and witnessed Meghan turn and “hiss” at a member of her entourage, clearly incandescent with rage about something, and demand to leave.

‘I later saw that same – female – highly distressed member of staff sitting in an official car, with tears running down her face. ….
.................
The staff bullying claims, the extremely high staff turnover, other reports of Meghan's attitude to staff members....are pretty damning.
These allegations should be taken very seriously and not brushed off as some vendetta against Meghan, unless there is stuff which didn't come from Meghan herself/what she tells her PR machine (and we know she has lied about a lot of things) that such an ongoing vendetta existed. I know of none.

Well given what has come to light about the report that the palace are refusing to hand over that little hit piece is just that, a hit piece.

I highly doubt anything happened at all as many are guessing and given that there’s no actual evidence to suggest she did it appears that’s the case.

Meghan vindicated once again :flutter:

yesterday, fish, windows, open, draft excluder, monkey.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/utLAb...=200.webp&ct=g

There too many stories for it not to be true. Shes lucky the queen isnt as vindictive as duchess difficult or she wouldnt be trying to bury all these allegations on little miss difficult's behalf.

Meghan was given the report - she can hand it over...:hee:

Exactly.

Source?

The Queen

Hissing? :joker:

She's one of the reptiles!!

A descripive term to show extreme disapproval or contempt towards someone.
Not usually considered an hilarious action. :bored:

BULLY MARKLE
 

"There was emotional cruelty, manipulation, and bullying".

"palace employees say they were humiliated by Meghan Markle.

bullying royal staffers into leaving their jobs back when she lived in Kensington Palace.
She came under fire when a number of employees went on to expose her conduct.

https://www.geo.tv/assets/uploads/up...05_updates.jpg

https://www.geo.tv/latest/423499-meg...exposed-expert

You have got a good imagination
I suppose the boos they got were pre recorded by the palace.

"They added that locals "will never see the light of day" because "the Queen wants peace".

I totally get that. She doesn’t need any more hassle. If Meghan was exonerated by the report, there is no way on earth the Queen would hold back that information.
The claims of bullying by Meghan have obviously been found to be valid ones, as they more than likely expected they would be, but the Palace is refusing to make the results public (like they said they wouldn’t from the start) to avoid the inevitable press/social media/Meghan & Harry storm of coming out and saying so directly.
It's how they handle sensitive issues, rather reminiscent of the diplomatic 'recollections may vary'. :hee:

Or rather and more likely, the report isn’t being made public because they found no evidence. Let’s be real if there was anything it would have been leaked with every last detail revealed.

It’s highly amusing that those that claim that the decision to not publicise the report proves nothing unyet those very people did not defend the Royals when Meghan and Harry accused a member of the Royal family of being racist but refused to name them….:laugh:

….but you are willing to accept there is a racist in the Royal family because Meghan said so…even though she refused to name them… :laugh:

We’re not all blinded by irrational hatred so can form our own opinions. We don’t need to be led by the tabloids which is where 99% of the nonsense stories come from.

I’d rather believe the people actually involved speaking about the events rather than a hit piece in a newspaper.