![]() |
Quote:
You’re talking about a hypothetical. The facts are she is donating the money. That is a fact not some imagined scenario. |
Quote:
I dont think we are 'tearing them apart'....They have chosen to leave the job...so they should surrender everything that came with it....simple really. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:conf: |
Quote:
I know she doesnt need the money....thats why she is giving her fee to charity. However you call her family scum for telling their story for money...but its ok for Meghan to tell hers because she is financially able and can give her fee to charity...that makes it all ok does it??? |
Quote:
|
...is this for the Oprah interview..?...there is no donation being made to any of their charities, as well as no fee being given...it was posted earlier in the thread...
"A spokeswoman for the Oprah Winfrey Network confirmed that the couple won’t be collecting a paycheck and said that no donations are being made to their charity." While there were news outlets that would probably have paid millions for this exclusive insight into Meghan and Harry's lives and minds, it seems that's not what it's about. And if that is the case, it's not particularly surprising. Meghan Markle has long been the target of unwarranted invasion into her life. She faced regular harsh and unnecessary criticism after joining the royal family, and ultimately ended up suing a newspaper (and winning) after they published parts of a private letter written to her father following her May 2018 wedding. Naysayers might argue that giving an interview goes against Meghan's desire for privacy, but I think it does the exact opposite. It allows her to tell her story in her own words; something she was unable to do in her position as a working member of the British royal family. For the Sussexes, setting the record straight is clearly important to them, and without sounding too much like the Mastercard advert... that's priceless. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I would get the OTT stuff if they were going on Oprah then Ellen and then Late night with James Corden and more TV interviews but this is just a 1 off TV interview :laugh: It's soo easy to understand what privacy Meghan and Harry wants because every celebrity wants the same thing but they do way more media stuff than Harry and Meghan. No one is that naive to think they can magically disappear just like that. Like you said before they need to go to mars to do that or maybe prison themselves. They never said they don't want to not be famous anymore. |
Quote:
We can stop with the hypotheticals about selling stories because of money and go back to her family being unethical scums of the Earth. |
Quote:
Her family clearly don’t care about her the way everyone paints them to and something must have happened between them for Meghan to shun them the way she has and given the evidence of their behaviour since she married it’s clear to see why. |
Quote:
"Considering that the first impulse her family seemed to have was to make money off of her" You are putting the cart before the horse here. It wasn’t their first impulse. At the time of the engagement she point blank refused the Palaces’ offer to send Aides to help her father, who was being hounded relentlessly by paparazzi. She told Harry she had no family - he said during a radio interview that ‘His family was going to be the family she never had’. This made the Markle family very angry indeed. It seemed she didn’t want Harry to meet him or talk to him, at least until the wedding was done and dusted. Her father had worked his butt off to give her a great education in all the best LA schools where she mixed with the kids of famous celebs, supported her all through uni and bought her an apartment. There are many accounts of that info, including from Meghan herself in her TIG blog. Her father and half sister in particular were being maligned and misrepresented and started speaking out. Whatever payment they received, its mere buttons compared to the big bucks Meghan has sold herself for, not on merit, but via the Royal titles, which are supposed to be used for public service, not personal gain. The wrecking ball all started with Meghan, not anyone else, and its continuing with their disrespect and bitter spats with the Queen, who was particularly welcoming and warm to her. Meghan is the toxic common denominator in all this. |
Her father wasn’t ‘hounded’ by press. He had a deal and was photographed posing with books about Britain.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I will repeat myself from my earlier post....REGARDLESS of money involved or not... the FACT remains that you call her family SCUM for telling THEIR story but its OK for Meghan to tell hers....:laugh: |
Quote:
|
talkRADIO poll on youtube
Should Harry and Meghan lose their titles of Duke and Duchess of Sussex? 6.2K votes Yes -90% No - 10% |
Quote:
How do you know he wasnt hounded? |
Quote:
Too right...:dance: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
...well 10% do. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Meghan hasn’t made a dime from her story nor will she because she is classy. You can’t ignore the FACT they SOLD stories for MONEY. They’re sole aim of SELLING the stories. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.