No of course they shouldn't lose titles.
Amazing how people take notice of polls if the voting suits their own agenda.

I take not a scrap of notice of polls seriously.
Even they're favourable to my own position.
I don't trust any of them.

Past history had Edward V111 gave up the throne to marry someone the Royals and government didn't want him to.

He had the title as his wife did Duke and Duchess of Windsor to their deaths.

Of course Prince Harry and Meghan should keep their Duke and Duchess titles..
Ridiculous.

Lord above, those who detest them will be calling for them to be hung ,drawn and quartered soon.
How utterly ridiculous and childishly pathetic in my view.

Well you know what Jet....even with Meghans 'unethical' self serving pity on the back of a Documentry about poverty striken and abused women in SA...no one called her out as 'SCUM'....

Are people still using polls with 6.2K votes and thinking they are accurate?

Sorry to break it to you internet polls will never be accurate not with 6.2K votes anyway when there's millions of people that exist.

We wouldn't have seen that poll possibly on here had it been 90/10 the other way Luke.

I still wouldn't have been posting it for sure as I wouldn't have believed or trusted it, as I don't that one either.

So what?....that doesnt make it right.

Their titles were a wedding gift weren't they? Bit crass to then take them back. The Queen is too classy for that. Even if the titles were stripped, Harry would still be a Prince, son and brother of the future Kings and as such Meghan would still be married to a Prince.

The stories Meghans family have only sold because they are about her. Meghan could sell a story about a snail and someone would buy it. That's the difference.

It's all very sordid and should have been left private but hey its out there, people will lap up the side of the story they are aligned to and debunk the other. I don't know anyone on here who has had their opinion changed by the stuff posted on the forum (I know a few changed opinion after the SA interview). Which is why these threads always descend into a mess through frustration.

Like them, don't like them, they will always be linked to the Royals due to Harry's parentage

The poll exists and 6.2K people have spoken

like it or not

90%

Exactly :laugh:

I wouldn't either espically with a really low amount of votes.

He gave up the throne after the death of his Father, yet still had and kept a title all through their lives.
Rightly I add.

HOWEVER what on earth is the crime these 2 have done to warrant every professional and likely public humiliation possible.

Plus more to the point, really what kind of people want to see that is what really would worry me.

'We can all live a life of service. Service is universal': Harry and Meghan's extraordinary dig after 'saddened' Queen strips them of remaining honorary roles a month early because they have abandoned a 'life of public service'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html




:bored:

And Meghan accepted BIG BIG money from Netflix and Spotify on the back of her Royal titles, not on merit, but scrambling over young talent who had worked hard to get a break like that, and didn't. She accepted a mansion to live in in Canada rent free, and has been ferried around in Elton John's private jet FREE. The freeloading shameless hussy. :fist:

I think their are two of them that accepted all that Jet....let's not heap the blame on just Meghan....is Harry a freeloading hussy too?

That's right Rusti, no - one here stoops to calling her derogatory names. Yet I've seen many who defend Meghan calling other public figures awful names.

They just treat Harry like a little baby which is worrying and insulting to Harry and put all the blame on the woman because it can never be two always the female.

You’ve literally just called her a freeloading hussy...

Point taken Annie. :wavey:

Such a lack of class, they may as well have said **** you

Its not even heat of the moment either, they signed off on that statement

But not from selling stories...

That is to all intents and purposes a job..... not selling your own family out to make a quick buck

It's a joke because of what we were just talking about with the name calling.
(Note the jokey fist!) :rolleyes:
We never call her derogatory names, I hate that kind of stuff that gets thrown around like 'orange moron' etc.

Public service is universal.
It's not just the possession of being done only if doing Royal duties.

I'd hope you're not possibly trying to infer public service cannot be done by any other groups or individuals.

It's a true statement, public service is for any to do and is universal.
Or do you not agree that's the case.
Possibly that they cannot do public service unless they do it under Royal duty banners.

You’ve called Meghan and Harry a LOT of derogatory names jet come on, Jesus

When are they going to start their public service?

They'd be doing the public a service if they would shut up and stop preaching.

Like what? Name them.

You'll know my answer in advance.

So no point in me attempting to debate it with you as all you'll say to me as you insultingly did the other day, is that I'm talking bull.....

So really no wish to engage with you at all, sorry.

They are getting progressively very bitter with the Royals Cherie, which is foolish of them. I wonder where its all going to lead....