Well it is moreorless documented that the whole Rachel Rice win was a fix. There was a surge of votes at the end for her - something to do with a Bookies scam - read it somewhere on another site:joker:

Who is Max?

Anyway, I think Rachel was a fantastic winner - didn't win because she had a disability (Pete), didn't win because she made an absolute fool of herself (Brian), and didn't win by getting the female votes (Anthony)

She was a sweet, caring person who was herself completely in that house. She wasn't using the house to achieve a career on the outside (like almost every other contestant), she just went in for the experience. She was a great winner - she wasn't boring, she was real. If you tell me that Luke & Bex should've won you're pathetic - they're desperately searching for fame and had an intricate gameplan.

One of my favourite things about Rachel winning is that you didn't hear about her pathetically stalking the paparazzi at a London nightclub, she just went back to her normal life. It proves that she's genuine, not searching for fame or money, and was in there for the experience. A great winner, I say - and I know we won't find that this year. Every housemate in there will be doing anything they can to be in the papers, I guarantee you that.

I seem to remember Rex saying she was as exciting as scrabble or words to that effect:colour:

So you like housemates what don't do anything

I would swap you for scrabble :thumbs:



I would also.

Rachel was a feeble hm who prostrated herself at the feet of Rex. She was a coward and a seething mass of passive-aggressiveness. She was twee like Laura Ingols. Her bottom half blew up like a balloon such that it looked like the back end of a horse and her face looked like the back end of a bus, and the paparazzi have no interest in her. Nor the lads' mags, nor noone.