Wrong, he doesn't want to participate in nominating. Thats not 'what so ever', if that was the case he would've left completely. He just wants to be there because the public decide to keep him there, he has already said this. He said he wanted to be up each week and have the public decide - no free rides, his exact words. Its not like he never nominated.

iF siavash doesnt want to take part in the game he wont be wanting to win the money then

'Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.'

Actually you are wrong. If you have been watching the past episodes he has said that he doesn't want to play THE GAME! Which is why he isn't nominating.

I feel I am going round and round in circles here.

And ridiculous arguements such as yours are the lowest form of logic ... Do us a favour and grow up

exactly!i like both siavash and sophie,dont give a **** what reasons they gave,same thing either way.its only a game show.:rolleyes:

Because I have a different opinion to you means I need to grow up?

Watch back, he said he doesn't want to participate in 'that' part of the game. I feel its your ignorance thats making this go round in circles. Its obvious you don't like siavash lets try and be objective instead of sticking up for one rule break and not another. In the end a rule break is a rule break, as simple as.

But this isn't about the rule break. I think that they should both be punished equally (or not in this case) for breaking the rules.

This is about the difference in their reasons. I really am getting tired of this now

Well give in on your fail arguement then because it really is. If you want to promote Sophie fine no worries go right ahead ... just don't think you will get away with being biased because you won't.

Be fair or be prepared to be fought at every turn.

I would prefer not to call this an arguement these are my veiws and you are free to express yours.

I do think they should both be punished for breaking rules I am explaining the difference in their reasons for doing so - looking deeper into it.

Just in case anyone missed your post in this other thread ...
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...brother-10.htm

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sophie wasn't right not to nominate either. ( change of heart was it?)

Siavash makes me more angry because he doesn't want to play the game. I just don't understand why he is still there then?

-- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Stop contradicting yourself

Lol, what she still cant get is no matter how deep you look into it, they both equate to the exact same thing. A rule break. That. Is. It. Plain. And. Simple (:

I KNOW THIS!

They both did not nominate.

They both should be punished (or not) equally.

I am explaining the difference in their reasons.

I like Sophie

I dislike Siavash

Answer the question. Why are you contradicting yourself?

HOW?!

yes but you have to remember even though Siavash is orignal in regards to what he wears he is a follower and not a leader, but it was Bea that put the idea in his head and he throught that evryone was going to follow suit but what he did'nt realise was that Bea was setting him up so that she would'nt get alot of nominations. Siavash and Sophie's action was breacking the rules but the reasoning behide is was that they throught all the HMs would be up as they throught that it would be fair, did you see them all getting angry as they were scare that because of their actions they all would be up especially, David, Charlie, Rods and Lisa

Here you post this

Sophie on the other hand couldn't think of anyone to nominate on this occasion. She is still playing she isn't refusing to be a part of everything.

While here
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...brother-10.htm

you post this
Sophie wasn't right not to nominate either.

You clearly make an excuse for her in this thread yet tell us in the other thread she was wrong

You are contradicting yourself. Make sure you are consistent with your opinions, arguements or whatever you want to call them or someone will take issue and undermine you every time.

how is siavash a follower?

Ok.

This is the LAST. TIME.

I am saying this.

This thread explains the differences between their reasons for not nominating.

Which having been ridiculed by the majority of posters here anyway is still in contrast to something you said in a different thread.

Not good enough. If your convictions were solid you wouldn't be changing your story from one thread to another.

Yoy
 

I am polish sorry:sad:

I like Siavash a lot but BB should threaten him with eviction with immediate effect if he refuses to play by BB rules. He knew the score when he went in, and if he doesn't want to play the game anymore then he doesn't deserve to win the money.