this shows her true colours

Only on this forum could someone be accused of being "selfish" for having their stuff stolen.

And what glamour model have you seen lately not that's off their tits pissed drunk?????? Ehhh fits her profession PERFECTLY I would say..

Take alook back at LF a few nights back to see the Sly Marcus going through the food cubbards taking food and putting it under his bed .thats why he stays up after the other are in bed ,sly man.

she has stolen food and drink since day one.
little miss innocent, that is he one you can see naked, and more, on the adult channel. is about as sweet and innocent as eva braun.
you dohave to be stupid to see the adult channel video, they have the cheek to charge.
and before you ask, i have not seen them, cant stand fakwe tits, fake hair, fake face, and no personality.
a fitting match for kris.

Marcus is the man..

Shows you how they edit - during LF Charlie clearly pushed Sophie along saying it would be ok and that he would take the blame. I remember thinking at the time that Charlie would not be blamed because he had Sophie do the work - just like the time with Bea when they took Freddie's can! Yes she is to blame but he knew how to get what he wanted. He took a long time to convince her to get it.

Does anyone else think that he is trying to break up friendships in the house ? He seems to be jealous when others get along.

marcus is bullying sophie OMG it is one beer get over it :cheer:

There's that word again, the one so many people seem to have completely lost any grip on the meaning of.

The party food, the cigarettes, the alcohol are provided a bulk provisions. Do they count the sausage rolls, the sandwiches, the cakes, the pastries, the chicken dummers and have the same number each. No, they eat what they actually want, depending upon their appetites. Marcus doesn't want as much alcohol so why the hell is he hiding it in his drawer. He's like a dog burying a bone, just to stop other dog's getting it!

Deeply suspect actions. He is manipulating the situation to his own advantage, now there's a surprise NOT!

i thought so too and i note that he has tried to rile rodrigo a couple of times over the last few days
but cameras moved so i am hoping he didnt rise to the bait......

and i also noted that marcus pulled down the back of rodrigo' s pants whilst in the pond fight what did marcus hope for, a retaliation from rodrigo ........

i guess we ll see more of marcus going for the jugular so to speak........

the question is, will we see it.:sad:if we dont cos i want marcus out. lisa too.

The good thing about kleptomania is you can always take something for it.

Why shouldn't he put it in his drawer for later, when he does want it?

There is no reason why he shouldn't. I think some people here are sounding rather desperate, to be honest.

As I said earlier, only on this forum is someone attacked for having their stuff stolen. I think some people here have taken leave of their senses.

Try watching, it was Siavash's pants:eureka:

I noticed that.....

It would be interesting to know if there application contained the question......

would you steal?

Several in the house have done I can count 7 and not forgetting that rodrego has lost his bracelet which is very personal......

I am not suggesting anything other than it was shown/aired after the last eviction.

perhaps the rodrigo incident was done to rile him...

whichever or whatever, I think its really disgusting.

Theft is theft ... dress it up anyway you like because it will not make any difference to how people percieve what happened.

They stole his stuff regardless of if he wants to drink, trade or do whatever the hell he wants with it.

Which part of the word 'theft' is not understood here. Stop trying to sidetrack away from the primary issue which is they stole his stuff.

omg...haha marcus fans are so bitter on this forum!!!

Please refrain from insulting other members on the forum

I am impressed by the logical structure of your argumentation and the calm, reasoned tone you have taken with even your fiercest intellectual opponents.