| Jords |
25-08-2009 04:14 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by Zien
Quote:
Originally posted by -BB~Jordan-
The housemates have all had a go at Siavash not nominating again, but this time there is no big deal about it is there?
The housemates wont get punished, he will just nominate Charlie & Sophie for not doing so, isnt that like him nominating in the DR Charlie and Sophie?
The reason why Charlie has gone off his head is because he knows he will get a nom and he so wants to win this.
The reason Roddy went off his head is to look good saying you should respect BB blah blah blah.
David and Lisa went off their head to look good saying he broke rules and morals say you should do what BB asks.
And Marcus is being a bit of a unloyal friend in this scenrio which is disappointing (but he has had his doubts with Siavash).
The only decent HM who reacted in a decent way was Sophie, and that was just to move on and ignore the matter.
For me, Siavash, Sophie and Marcus are the only deservable winners, the rest are a bunch of idiots.
What do you lot think of this nominating row? :bouncy:
|
duh .... the need to nominate is one of the basic rules they are all aware of before entering the BB house. If he breaks them then he should be punished, i.e thrown out, not the other HM
|
Yeah but its hardly a reason to single somebody out like they have done.
Also BB told him the punishment would be that he would nominate Charlie & Sophie so thats it.
Charlie kicked off the argument becuz hes worried to be up, and he knows he got a nomination from Siavash therefore. |
