That see for yourself, there are plenty of answers on Google.
Or is Davina actually now the opposite of a poor presenter and actually a Television genius?
Because she would have to be to do all that stuff.:hugesmile:

i really like davina i know she gets a hard time but i think she is funny and a good presenter

Regardless of who's behind the interviews..it doesn't matter to me, I still think all the relevant issues are being avoided, and since BB was originally intended as a 'social experiment' (it was never intended to be a 'gameshow' in the crude sense, sick of hearing that)...I feel the worthless interviews make the show worthless. If they aren't going to address the Q of a bully, then don't keep the bully in there.

[rquote=2515830&tid=145338&author=The_Long_Run][rquote=2515451&tid=145338&author=J-Rock][rquote=2515418&tid=145338&author=merv]I can't believe folk are so in the dark to how these programs operate.:conf:
Where would Davina get the time to rehearse and write this stuff, for one she would have to be up 24 hours a day to see all footage.:sleep:
BB is not her only commitment.:nono:
She rehearses around the time of BBLB and sometimes we hear the same questions when they interupt her at that time.
Reminds me of the Little Britain Sketch" do you want me too Write the theme toon, sing the theme toon"
In between we have people believe she goes out and chooses her dress for the show and decides on it's colour...
So she is looking after her family of 3 kids, shopping for dresses, writing then presenting the script, of two back to back programs.
Blimey shes worth her weight in Gold
:hugesmile:[/rquote]


Nah, I aint buying it. I've always liked Davina and felt she was quite balanced in interviews. She bottled it tonight and took the dollar. Laid it on Bea, but not Lisa....I wonder why? (mmmm, anything to do with BB trying to avoid the 'bullying' issue yet again).
[/rquote]

Yes, Davina bullied Bea and got spoken to about it! She is NOT going to conduct another bullying interview.[/rquote]


:hugesmile:

As I keep saying tonight - Davina takes the money - so deserves the criticism when it is justified.

[rquote=2515892&tid=145338&author=troy4783]i really like davina i know she gets a hard time but i think she is funny and a good presenter[/rquote]

I love Davina but if my mum had done that interview I'd still have told her that letting Lisa off was a poor performance.

[rquote=2515887&tid=145338&author=merv]That see for yourself, there are plenty of answers on Google.
Or is Davina actually now the opposite of a poor presenter and actually a Television genius?
Because she would have to be to do all that stuff.:hugesmile:[/rquote]

She's a legend. Of course she does :wink:

"Regardless of who's behind the interviews..it doesn't matter to me, I still think all the relevant issues are being avoided, and since BB was originally intended as a 'social experiment' (it was never intended to be a 'gameshow' in the crude sense, sick of hearing that)...I feel the worthless interviews make the show worthless. If they aren't going to address the Q of a bully, then don't keep the bully in there. "


"As I keep saying tonight - Davina takes the money - so deserves the criticism when it is justified.
"

I agree with nost of these two comments.
What gets me at the end of this is the Belief Davina was responsible for good or bad questions, the interview times would desend into chaos if she was
All questions and possible answers would have bee tried and tested because of shedules.
I feel Davina does well when there are hiccuops, and recovers pretty well.
George Lamb is terrible at it, and answers for a guest before they have opened there mouth because of interview times restraints.

[rquote=2515221&tid=145338&author=merv]she as to remain as impartial as possible, to offer a balance.
In the lions Den which is BB Live with the crowd behind her making a racket and then the live studio audience, i reckon she keeps composure pretty well.[/rquote]Well she doesn't do that though. She was far nicer to Marcus than she was to Lisa!

[rquote=2516021&tid=145338&author=merv]"Regardless of who's behind the interviews..it doesn't matter to me, I still think all the relevant issues are being avoided, and since BB was originally intended as a 'social experiment' (it was never intended to be a 'gameshow' in the crude sense, sick of hearing that)...I feel the worthless interviews make the show worthless. If they aren't going to address the Q of a bully, then don't keep the bully in there. "


"As I keep saying tonight - Davina takes the money - so deserves the criticism when it is justified.
"

I agree with nost of these two comments.
What gets me at the end of this is the Belief Davina was responsible for good or bad questions, the interview times would desend into chaos if she was
All questions and possible answers would have bee tried and tested because of shedules.
I feel Davina does well when there are hiccuops, and recovers pretty well.
George Lamb is terrible at it, and answers for a guest before they have opened there mouth because of interview times restraints.


[/rquote]

If there's one thing I can't stand to see george lamb do, it's interact with other people. :sleep:

[rquote=2515178&tid=145338&author=merv]Every year it's the same"Davina didn't say this" or"Davina let em off light"
Davina is only the Mouth Piece, the words, the interview is 100 percent scripted by others.
Blame them.[/rquote]