LOL she was entitled to her opinion. If people didn't want to read her opinions then wtf were they doing look at her column..
She brought a bit of controversy to the whole thign, I was bored of reading "STEPHEN GATLEY DEAD" "STEPHEN GATELY DIES OF NATURAL CAUSES" etc etc etc.

was you actually that offended by it or are you just being offended on the behalf of people?

Maybe he is offended on the grounds of being a decent human being? Just a thought. You dont need to be a victim to find homophopbia disgusting. Many people do.

What the ****? You only find out her opinions through reading the column.

And oh well then that makes you a ****. :)

And Tom: she uses this, and the case of Matt Lucas' ex's suicide, as her reasoning for the 'failure' of civil partnerships. What isn't offensive about that?

Patrick!

LOLOL.

What were you when you were taking the piss jut when ROB died then?

It is being read into way too much. Shes saying how it isn't happily ever after, not that they fail.

Jan Moir and Nick Griffin are a pair of bigots who need to be lashed together and thrown in the Thames. I'd call that a bloody good start.

Equally *****, Billy.

And Tom; in these two instances yes. What about the others? Why should the rights of an entire section of society be tarnished or prevented because of some stupid woman's conclusion that 2 bad events = proof for all?

Does she say they shouldn't? As I said its all being read way into.

whilst gay people may be making a lot of noise and the odd hand wringing liberal metrosexual. most people dont give one about Jan Moir and casually are vaguely interested in gateley's death as it is a story that involves the x factor and peeps you have heard of.

Griffin is mixing it a bit in the sleazy world of politics and I am sure lots find it mildly diverting whist seeing straight through him.


the answer is you should not hate anyone, by doing so you lower yourself to the level that you find abhorrent.

nick!