![]() |
Quote:
|
usually when it gets to the final 5.. its all down to the public.
|
No, the vote should stay because if they just went to deadlock then the sing off would be for nothing, but the judges need to stop saving crap people over an actual good singer because that singer was in the bottom two more than once, it doesn't matter, it's still supposed to be about talent
|
i think that,
both the people in the bottom two should sing, as it's the last time for one of them and then they announce who's going by the public vote |
What about announcing the acts in the bottom two on the Saturday night, and then re-open the lines from scratch for just those two acts, and then on Sunday announce who is leaving.
Gives them both a second chance, gets rid of the Judge's vote, more money for ITV/Simon and makes Saturdays a bit more exciting rather than just the performances. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I assume your talking about Rachel? Simon said "This tells me somthing cause you have been in the bottom 2 three times now!" Which means the public didnt want her there, and people want Lloyd there! So it was good that she went as it made way for more talent. |
Quote:
Amazing Idea:hugesmile: |
Yeah... get rid of the mentor thing. It makes it a whole lot fairer that judges voting for their own acts.
|
Quote:
The public get it wrong all the time and the judges are there to ensure that the real talent doesn't leave the show, but unfortunately Simon has decided to take leave of his senses in order to earn a fast buck, thereby eliminating any integrity that the show ever possessed. J and E for the win! |
Patrick, you have said some shite recently, but your statement about rachel going for more talent is the pick of the bunch. Suggesting Lloyd is more talented than Rachel, what show have you been watching?
Do you fancy him or something? Oh dear. And please don't respond with the usual bollocks along the lines of 'the public thought otherwise'. The 12 year old girls may have thought otherwise, but to suggest Lloyd is more talented is an absolute joke, and highlights exactly why you are the laughing stock of this forum. Regards, alc09. :thumbs: |
Quote:
|
It's about whose marketable.
If the show was based solely on trying to find the most talented person with no public vote and just the judge's then Rachel would not have left quite clearly. But the show is about finding someone who is marketable and be successful from the show. Quite clearly Rachel was not that person, and being in the bottom two three times tells you that. Due to his looks, there is much more of a gap in the market for Lloyd. Argue that it's not right/bad etc all you like, but it's the truth, and that can't be changed. This is why she left, Simon had to make a decision based on who'd be more successful, and whether you like him or not, that's clearly going to be Lloyd. |
Quote:
Anyone else see the text at the bottom of the screen during Xtra Factor on Sunday night, along the lines of: "I'm only 12 but vote every week for Lloyd because he is so good looking" :joker: |
tbh if lloyd wins all they need to do is fiddle with his voice abit and tada, he looks the part and he will sell well
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As I said before - we can't allow these silly girls (and boys) to hijack the show and prevent genuine talent from getting a chance. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just because she was in the bottom 2 doesnt mean people dont want her there, they just wanted their favourite there more, Simon complains about J&E being there and how it's supposed to be about talent, but that result on sunday would have been like eliminating Alexandra over Eoghan, it's ridiculous |
I think they should have a vote off week rather than a vote to save, hopefully that way the novelty acts would go (we know who they are!)
:elephant::elephant: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.