This.

All for Wildcat banned?

He got banned for that one post he made where he replied to everyones posts? Quite stupid really. And AMA's probably right, just banned him because he annoys her (annoys me aswell like but still shouldn't be banned).

....Ross got banned for a week once for saying the word 'Roy'......1 Day for mass insulting people is a very light punishment.

Yeah, and why was that? Because of the biased of Red Moon.
And what was the reaction then by most people on here, including you I am sure? They were pissed! And opened loads of threads which were systematically removed.
I dont see how this is any different.
the point is, people do what he did all the time here.

And he wasnt even being serious. Just light hearted banter. No other mod would have banned her.

The difference here is that he insulted people while Ross did nothing wrong. IloveDC did wrong and so he got a short ban, would you be complaining if it was James or one of the other mods who did the banning or is it because Laura's an easy target?

It wasn't though, he was being insulting. There's nothing banterous about it.

Wildcat its only a day ban, he'll be back and posting tomorrow. It is a bit silly to come back and straight away start insulting imo, although it isnt nice saying I hope he never comes back, but meh dont get yourself banned over it.

Are you serious? LOL! You think I wouldnt have given James, 30stone, and all them the same piece of my mind? I have before, you can ask them. Its not like I give a shiit if I get banned or anything.

And I dont think he did anything wrong because I have seen other people do worse and not get banned. I have done worse and not get banned.

Its not the length. Its the principle, because I know for a fact she only banned him because he annoys her. Thats no reason.

If people got banned based on annoyance you would have been gone long before now, kid.

*lifts up bin lid and peeks out*

Is Wildcat still on his rant?

like Stu said in the other thread it's all about context, People said they wouldn't want him back which is fair that's their opinion. If you said the same about me and I called you a bastard would you take that as banterous? Would you try to be pointlessly rebellious to the mods if I got banned for the same thing?

You wouldn't.

LOL! :D
Alive and kicking, but James's been locking them up. This is my last available thread to rant in.

When has he ever stopped? :laugh:

Describing yourself obviously since you got banned :laugh2:

Yes I would. It has nothing to do with the person. I would have done the same.

But again, youre missing the point. I have been called worse names before, I have reported them even, and no one got banned.

Maybe a lot of people complained? Or he had a warning for behavior before? Maybe when you've been insulted in the past and reported it they've had words with the person in question? If Laura wrongly banned someone then James would have undone it by now.

I dont think so, because he got banned like 2 minutes later, and shaun didnt even know it happened.

She coulve had words with him, that was easy enough.

and it was one post, so they couldnt have been warned.

James probably cant be bothered.

Agree, bitches on here are getting away with everything because the new mods like them.

I got a warning for telling someone to learn to spell the word 'Brother' wtf is that all about.

And then someone called me an Irish Prick and FA is said to them.


Very Unfair these mods.

:bored:

You didnt recieve a real warning for that. If something was said it was just through U2U. Not a warning.

He is back Now.

Put your Rattle back in you Pram.