ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   BBC reporter Ray Gosling told viewers how he killed his Ill Gay Lover (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=131288)

arista 16-02-2010 06:31 PM

He is Live on Ch4 News now

arista 16-02-2010 06:39 PM

He is Not of a Sound Mind at all.
he just said we have Laws of The Heart up here in Nottingham.

He is a Nutter
just because he thinks he did the best thing
does not make This Legal.
He does not want the Law Changed,
he just wants to get away with his own Murder.

The BBC need to sack him fast.

ElProximo 17-02-2010 07:59 AM

You have to look at it this way - he is seen as a real authentic advocate for gay rights and this 'young man' who he was with (and may have given AIDS?) is dying slowly.
Maybe TOO slowly for Goslings liking.
Gosling simply cannot leave him. It would ruin his reputation and career.
How long might this young man have lived?
Possibly another year or more?
This is a full year where Gosling is, in effect, not allowed any more young 'bottoms', absolutely no orgies or 'glory holes' as the gays say it.
MAYBE he can have anonymous gay sex in some public park toilets.. but even that is risky and would look worse if caught cheating that way.
So?
Snuff the life out of this young man, collect all the praises and get massive credibility for gay rights, AIDS orgs and of course for 'staying by his side to the end',
and,
a few weeks later its back to the coke-filled toilet sex with new non-infected young men.

The cops better get on this now and start asking some tough questions.
I assume that Gosling will immediately cry 'Gay-bashing' at being questioned and quickly try and turn this around as himself being 'victimized by homophobics',
but,
the cops simply have to ignore that and investigate and question him no differently than if he was a skinhead or upper class mother or uni student.. all the same and no different.

Crimson Dynamo 17-02-2010 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 2998467)
You have to look at it this way - he is seen as a real authentic advocate for gay rights and this 'young man' who he was with (and may have given AIDS?) is dying slowly.
Maybe TOO slowly for Goslings liking.
Gosling simply cannot leave him. It would ruin his reputation and career.
How long might this young man have lived?
Possibly another year or more?
This is a full year where Gosling is, in effect, not allowed any more young 'bottoms', absolutely no orgies or 'glory holes' as the gays say it.
MAYBE he can have anonymous gay sex in some public park toilets.. but even that is risky and would look worse if caught cheating that way.
So?
Snuff the life out of this young man, collect all the praises and get massive credibility for gay rights, AIDS orgs and of course for 'staying by his side to the end',
and,
a few weeks later its back to the coke-filled toilet sex with new non-infected young men.

The cops better get on this now and start asking some tough questions.
I assume that Gosling will immediately cry 'Gay-bashing' at being questioned and quickly try and turn this around as himself being 'victimized by homophobics',
but,
the cops simply have to ignore that and investigate and question him no differently than if he was a skinhead or upper class mother or uni student.. all the same and no different.

This is the problem with this insidious new liberal craze

arista 17-02-2010 09:57 AM

He has now Been Arrested by Police.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ring-Aids.html


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/...52_468x346.jpg
The BBC North Inside Out docu'
and he broke BBC rules.

WOMBAI 17-02-2010 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 2998521)
He has now Been Arrested by Police.

Some have him hung, drawn and quatered without even knowing all the facts! Innocent until proven guilty - is that an expression that some on here are not at all familiar with!

arista 17-02-2010 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOMBAI (Post 2998524)
Some have him hung, drawn and quatered without even knowing all the facts! Innocent until proven guilty - is that an expression that some on here are not at all familiar with!


The BBC need to Sack him now.

Crimson Dynamo 17-02-2010 12:26 PM

this guy is a murderer.

bananarama 17-02-2010 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 2993638)
This one Law in the UK
will never change.

Your probably right our MP's are more interested in passing laws to slaughter the unborn than passing laws to save from suffering.......

I have a lot of sympathy for those that might assist a willing person who has had enough and wants to end it.......

This radio guy however refers to him as a bit on the side.......No proof that the victim wanted his life ended........

Under such circumstances he has laid himself wide open to be charged with murder and to serve a long jail sentence........

Latest news this morning is that he has been arrested.........

arista 17-02-2010 06:28 PM

Just Reported on Ch4 News Live

The Bloated BBC that made that Docu'
has not handed the Police the Video of him saying how he killed
his (Bit On The Side) younger lover.

The Poxy BBC say the Police must get a Court Order.


The BBC Executive of this show
should be removed
for not knowing what was going to be shown.

Shaun 17-02-2010 10:52 PM

Wow. I agree with WOMBAI.

BB_Eye 18-02-2010 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 2993749)
You would hope I was on the jury if you were the murdered mans parents or family and friends,
but,
Actually police do have to investigate that possibility. They will also investigate his claim it was an act of desperate 'mercy killing' to.

I'd be worried about you investigating crimes and accepting his story because you feel he is gay and cannot be wrong.
Or would you?

No, that is all in your head, because you are homophobic and feel the need to remind us that you are every time you post it seems. Wombai never even referred to the fact he was gay. You pulled that one out of your ass.

Stu 18-02-2010 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 2993560)
killing is killing. he has No right to be God.

So are you against healthcare as a whole? After all, isn't that playing God too?

ElProximo 18-02-2010 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BB_Eye (Post 3003721)
No, that is all in your head, because you are homophobic and feel the need to remind us that you are every time you post it seems. Wombai never even referred to the fact he was gay. You pulled that one out of your ass.

BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.

I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?

WOMBAI 18-02-2010 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 3003739)
BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.

I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?

You can't put words in people's mouths - saying they supported someone because the person is gay, when they never mentioned about them being gay. That is simply an assumption - which rather invalidates your point!

Crimson Dynamo 18-02-2010 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas Iscariot (Post 3003728)
So are you against healthcare as a whole? After all, isn't that playing God too?

Only Boots and certain branches of Semi Chem

ElProximo 18-02-2010 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOMBAI (Post 3003744)
You can't put words in people's mouths - saying they supported someone because the person is gay, when they never mentioned about them being gay. That is simply an assumption - which rather invalidates your point!

No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.

So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.

WOMBAI 18-02-2010 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 3003755)
No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.

So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.

Sounds like you are every '...ist' going! Anti gay, anti women, anti anyone different from you!

WOMBAI 18-02-2010 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 3003755)
No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.

So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.

Your comments were based on assumptions - not facts - simple as! And your assumptions were wrong, therefore so was your point! Who has it 'double-wrong' now then? Just your wee male brain pulling off another dumb moment!

ElProximo 18-02-2010 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOMBAI (Post 3003783)
Your comments were based on assumptions - not facts - simple as! And your assumptions were wrong, therefore so was your point! Who has it 'double-wrong' now then? Just your wee male brain pulling off another dumb moment!

No, that is not correct.
The 'point' depended on my assumptions regardless of whether they were correct or not.
To try and simplify it for you - 'I would be afraid if...(proposal that might happen)... point.

I know.. I have absolutely no doubt your brain is just freaking out right now but can I just give you some advice:
- Don't try to think this through any further.
Just accept it or not but just move on.
Trust me.

ElProximo 18-02-2010 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOMBAI (Post 3003772)
Sounds like you are every '...ist' going! Anti gay, anti women, anti anyone different from you!

It sounds like that?
Why should it 'sound' like that to you?
Because I am for equal rights and responsibilities and justice for people regardless of whether they are gay or not?
That 'sounds like' someone being 'antigay' to you?
Once again.. certain kind of brain can do that and oh well.

Women?
No no, I love women so much I often give them orgasms. That makes me feel happy too.

but here again.. suppose I was an 'ist' for one thing.
Why should I be an 'ist' for another?
Is that how simple and narrow-minded you have to see things or what?
Why can't I be racist against certain disappointing peoples and be in favour of others?
Maybe I dislike gays but I am all for lesbians?

You need to open your mind and stop thinking in this one small squirrely ball of confusion.
The world is more than just 'pink or blue' either/or.

WOMBAI 18-02-2010 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 3003794)
No, that is not correct.
The 'point' depended on my assumptions regardless of whether they were correct or not.
To try and simplify it for you - 'I would be afraid if...(proposal that might happen)... point.

I know.. I have absolutely no doubt your brain is just freaking out right now but can I just give you some advice:
- Don't try to think this through any further.
Just accept it or not but just move on.
Trust me.

If you mean by 'freaking out' - laughing myself silly - then got it in one! No I don't think I will even try to unmangle your messed up thought processes - as I don't think the end result will be worth the effort somehow! Trust you - I think not! :hugesmile:

Beastie 18-02-2010 10:30 AM

Part time Lover.

BB_Eye 18-02-2010 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 3003739)
BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.

I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?

If you are, then I'm lost for words. Why do you resent the people who have changed the law to give us the same rights as everyone else?

ElProximo 18-02-2010 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BB_Eye (Post 3004112)
If you are, then I'm lost for words. Why do you resent the people who have changed the law to give us the same rights as everyone else?

We already had the exact same rights before and after (regardless of whether you talk UK or Canada or USA where some states tried this).

One adult man had every right to marry one adult woman (I know more conditions apply) and that was the same for you, me or anyone else. There was 100% equal standards for all.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.