Your opinion doesnt really come into it tbh, if people want to pay for live feed what's it to you? its not your cash is it?

soooo the credit crunch? :hugesmile:

I recall the australians doing LF for nothing. Has Davina taken a paycut I wonder?

Actually, if people would bycott this service and send letters demanding uncensored live feed for free, then channel 4 would have to listen, no?

Read and learn: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2...marketturmoil1

no its not how it works im afraid its a very charming and innocent way of looking i suppose but also very nieve

Enlighten us.

Bob you need to fully explain your reasoning or you're going to look even more foolish than usual.

Can't people just do what they want?

do your own homework its a matter of ecenomics and british law.

Of course they can.

Just like I'm doing what I want: calling a spade a spade.

than usual? i thought you were new here?

Cop out.

Anyway, I am 100% certain that if viewers complained, we could have uncensored live feed for free. Channel 4 could just pump out more adverts if they want more money.

Also, they should either give proper live feed or scrap it completely.

I lurk.

Jeez! I was only correcting you! No need to jump down my throat about it!! Financial Crisis (name I should've used) or credit crunch is the name for the current economic problems. I would've said recession but we aren't in recession any more. Look:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financi...007–2010

And how exactly was I 'watering down' the harsh times we are living in??

Like TheHarbinger I think it's brilliant for 3 months and the bird noises are hardly played very often.

If they did it uncensored they would probably get sued quite alot.

I'm sure they cover up alot of stuff with soundcuts.

just a bit! wildcat seems to ignore that this whole thread is just a windup

Bullshit. I've noticed in the past that when they are just talking about non legal stuff their voices are censored. I have a hard time believing they are constantly naming brand names for hours on end and BB ''have'' to censor it.

I think it's a scam personally. I don't believe for one minute the HM's would even talk about anything OTHER than their own shallow, inter-personal relationships and THAT surely doesn't need censoring.

I don't buy it. I believe BB are just hogging all the best footage and then giving us snippets in HL.

Hardly. I've actually explained my points btw. You might want to take note.

Or they don't want to show people the full nastiness sometimes.

well done you have aired your opinion on it.
other people are entitled to air their opinion without being called idiots too.

That too.

But you know, even if people are being nasty in the house, that's what you're paying for right? Full uncensored live feed?

But instead you get a heavily cesnored version that isn't even worth paying for. It's stupid people still purchase livefeed when it's pointless and a waste of time.

You never explain your own reasoning though, do you. You make the odd comment here and there but when asked to actually defend your position, you slither side to side more than even the slyest cobra!