she looks nice IMHO

I liked laura when she was in the house - thought she looked like Meryl Streep, the actress. But have to say I am not impressed by these pics on NUTS. They look so run-of-the mill - like thousands of others that have gone before. No originality in the poses. I suppose there's only so much that can be done.

She looks great.

Well done to her!

She looks good, didnt think she was that type of girl though.

What type? A slutty type? :joker:

I think most women have a hidden vamp inside them. By nature they have to entice men for procreational purposes.

Wow. She doesn't even last a week and she jumps straight on the nuts bandwagon. Way to make yourself even more pathetic Laura!

She's got a very plain face,but lots of people suffer from 'blonde goggles syndrome' where no matter how ugly a girl is,if she has blonde hair that instantly means she's hot.

She's ugly.

If it weren't for the mindless morons who pay money for the likes of Nuts Magazine, nobodies like her wouldn't be in them half-dressed.

I wonder what she will spend the £100 on?

so is "Lady" GaGa :dance:

I suppose that the photo shoot could always be sponsored by Good Year seeing she has at least 2 of their spare tyres around her middle!!

Are you looking at the same pictures? Of Laura??

The girl has not one ounce of spare flesh anywhere!

She looks gorgeous, and infinitely more interesting than when she was in the house.

she has a body to die for

Great photos. :hugesmile:

Don't ya just hate hand-bra's.:blush:

Nice rack.

She looks fine :conf:

Nice.

All we need now is Rachel!

She looks like a young Beverley Callard. You know... Liz MacDonald off Corrie.

My cousin went out with Beverley Callard's daughter, Laura is more attractive than her.

What exactly is supposed to be "Scary"?

Hooray to Photoshop

Yes, she is more attractive... but she still looks like her.

she got a crooked nose.