Quote:
Originally Posted by ange7
(Post 3654026)
"Sam went in because he though Josie looked 'genuinely upset' "
you don't believe that do you? He doesn't give a care about Josie. He saw a chance to show JJ1 and he ran to it.
|
That was John James opinion.
Which highlights to me that John James is aware that when he has these 'relationship' discussions with Josie the cameras are on him. Therefore he seems to have it in his mind - very much like Dave - that the outside world like him and are interested in what he has to say.
To be honest I don't know if Sam went in the bedroom because he really thought that, I wasn't there but I watched it all last night and that was what Sam told Josie and Josie agreed with him. So I have no real evidence that Sam was lying.
From what I can gather from the bits of livefeed I managed to catch today Sam has spent the parts of the day in Josie's company, without winding her up, at the smoking area as well as having a water bomb fight. Which tells me that they have a friendship of sorts. Whereas the only time I see John James interact with Josie is when the camera has been off him for a while or if he is up for eviction, where in he takes to the bed with her.
I don't personally condone Sam's behaviour I have said this in my post but if Josie is willing to let it go I don't see why John James' needs to bring it up time and time again nor do I understand why his 'fans' need to keep drilling it into everyone elses heads in much the same way. You are entitled to an opinion by all means, but if you read my post again you will see that I said I thought both Sam and John James were to blame and that out of the two I felt John James had behaved inappropriately.
I will repeat this again.
Sam can't take back going into the bedroom he did it - I don't think he should have but he has told Josie and John James and even the rest of the house his reasons, whether you believe it or not is down to you, not me - John James can help sitting in a shower talking about his 'friend' in the house for 15-20 minutes.
The aftermath could of been avoided as there was no reason for Dave to encourage Sam to confront John James, when Sam confronted John James there was no need for him to begin ranting and raising his voice to him. BOTH parties behaved badly, I have never said any different, I just think they are at varying degrees.
Obviously this is wasted though as you will just repeat the same John James was in the right argument, I accept you have your opinion now please just accept I have my own and leave it at that.
Thank you:wavey: