ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB11 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=551)
-   -   David: Why shouldn't Dave win? Even if he is a con artist! (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=155780)

Vicky. 15-08-2010 04:32 PM

I dont like Dave.

But I do agree that people should be judged based on what they do INSIDE the house.

flamingGalah! 15-08-2010 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claymores (Post 3663578)
Dave can cure cancer with the lord - he should win :thumbs:

What a disgusting thing to say & joke about... :nono:

Abhorsen 15-08-2010 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Truth Is Out There! (Post 3663194)
I'm not voting for any favourite - but I object to the principle of BB inviting him on to BB because of his 'cult'

That isn't the reason BB put him on the show. That would be like saying BB put Corin on the show to promote tanning beds. LOL.

Quote:

and I object to his sumbliminal evangelizing on our screens!
RLMAO.

The Truth Is Out There! 15-08-2010 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingers (Post 3663272)
I don't doubt that a lot of forummers would applaud and support Osama bin Laden if he was in the house! On the premise that, who cares what he does on the outside, he makes me laugh!

You're certainly on form - you make me laugh!:joker: Keep going!:hugesmile:

Abhorsen 15-08-2010 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchinittoomuch (Post 3663218)
Wahey! Gwan Abhorsen!

Each and every one of the housemates in that house has been called out as fake on some aspect of their personality, so it's a good point, arent they conmen too? If what they are portraying is not what they really are?

FWIW I only support housemates regarding their time in the house and not out of it aswell, and I'd be happy for a Dave or Josie win :D

Exactly, HMs should only be judged on their time in the house, nothing more. Apart from anything else, it would be silly for anyone to think they could judge someone's whole life so far and then decide whether to phone vote for them on a reality TV show on the basis of their *judgement*.

chuff me dizzy 15-08-2010 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abhorsen (Post 3663640)
Exactly, HMs should only be judged on their time in the house, nothing more. Apart from anything else, it would be silly for anyone to think they could judge someone's whole life so far and then decide whether to phone vote for them on a reality TV show on the basis of their *judgement*.

WRONG,He should never have been allowed in in the first place,so would you think it ok for a paedo,murderer,terrorist to go in ?

Abhorsen 15-08-2010 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingers (Post 3663272)
I don't doubt that a lot of forummers would applaud and support Osama bin Laden if he was in the house! On the premise that, who cares what he does on the outside, he makes me laugh!

Now you compare Dave to a terrorist. LOL.

Claymores 15-08-2010 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flamingGalah! (Post 3663619)
What a disgusting thing to say & joke about... :nono:

I was reflecting a tale that Dave told to other HMs when he put hands-on. As a cancer survivor who still has to go to Clinical Oncology every 3 months to be scanned for more, I find YOUR remark as objectionable as Dave's

BB_Eye 15-08-2010 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 3663644)
WRONG,He should never have been allowed in in the first place,so would you think it ok for a paedo,murderer,terrorist to go in ?

In before Sisqo jokes

chuff me dizzy 15-08-2010 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claymores (Post 3663669)
I was reflecting a tale that Dave told to other HMs when he put hands-on. As a cancer survivor who still has to go to Clinical Oncology every 3 months to be scanned for more, I find YOUR remark as objectionable as Dave's

Ditto on both counts ,no wonder we HATE Dave,IF someone had said to me when I was 1st diagnosed they could cure me for £30 I would have handed it over in a heartbeat ,Dave and his cult make a living (and a pretty good living too, posh cars ,flying all over the world) ,out of conning people like you and me

flamingGalah! 15-08-2010 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claymores (Post 3663669)
I was reflecting a tale that Dave told to other HMs when he put hands-on. As a cancer survivor who still has to go to Clinical Oncology every 3 months to be scanned for more, I find YOUR remark as objectionable as Dave's

Hardly a thing to joke about then is it? I lost my Dad to cancer by the way...

starry 15-08-2010 06:38 PM

He was never going to win, he is too old to fit the profile of a winner. However he has done very well to get this far.

fingers 15-08-2010 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starry (Post 3663887)
He was never going to win, he is too old to fit the profile of a winner. However he has done very well to get this far.

The only reason he is still in there is because the Press have a gagging order to NOT report his real life outside the house.:wavey:

stoney 16-08-2010 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BB_Eye (Post 3663607)
You think that brainwashing and taking advantage of cancer patients has no bearing on somebody's character? That there is nothing insidious or exploitative in what he does? And more to the point, are you really so flippant that you can say somebody's comments on an internet forum are 'equally repulsive'?



what you haters just dont get is they are not brainwashing anyone.
Some people actual believe in faith healing.
for some it brings a little hope in a bad time and even for a very few some relief.
Yes I do find it repulsive that some people use this fact and distort it in a point scoring exercise to try to drum up support against someone in a gameshow simply to help their favourite win it:nono:

ElProximo 16-08-2010 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingers (Post 3663163)
I do not have any favourite, and St. Dave is nothing but a charlatan who conned BB into INVITING him in, they probably thought it would be hilarious to have him lurching around in a "drunken stupor" for weeks!

It is true - Dave was found on Youtube, sought out and then invited. Which is fine.
It is also true that they invited him for the very point and purpose of acting shamefully in 'drunken stupor'.
David agrees with this. He explained this at the very beginning and said he knew that was why.
He also explained how he did not feel comfortable around new people in a new environment and wasn't 'himself' (meaning, going into drunken glory easily).

So in these things you agree with me and I don't think anyone else here disagrees.

The problem is that you do understand BB found him - sought him out - invited him...
...then you insist that he 'conned' them into inviting him.
How and why?
Do you think he created this 'persona' or 'character' somehow knowing it would lure BB into inviting him?
That was what BB was looking for and so for years he put on this character all to dupe the BB people who he knew would look for a drunk preacher housemate?

Beso 16-08-2010 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abhorsen (Post 3663137)
It's hilarious watching all the posters on the forum getting their knickers in a twist over Dave, because *in their opinion* he is a bad person, con artist, fake whatever, blah, blah. But isn't it funny how those same posters don't want to hold their fave HMs up to the same scrutiny as Dave - it's almost as if they are just bias and trying to find any reasons to get votes against Dave to save their own fave HM (but that couldn't be their motive could it :shocked: LOL.)

Give it up. Dave deserves votes for what he has done in the house and not what he has or has not done out of the house. It is game show!!! Not judgement day!!!

You're only going on about Dave to save your own HM, enough with YOUR fake *moral high ground*.

Obviously BB checked his background and they are fine with it, so he is OK, if he wasn't OK BB would not have put him in the house.

:cat:

Beso 16-08-2010 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BB_Eye (Post 3663419)
I'm sorry, but you're going to have to explain that. Do all the other housemates run organizations that I don't know about that exploit and lie to some of the most vulnerable members of society?

or it could be said, offer a safe haven, shoulder to cry on, able to impart knowledge of coming off drugs/drink...but oh no, they offer these poor ex druggies/alkeys no support whatsoever !!!:sleep:

Beso 16-08-2010 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 3663644)
WRONG,He should never have been allowed in in the first place,so would you think it ok for a paedo,murderer,terrorist to go in ?


john james has the pedo covered.

Orvakki 16-08-2010 09:05 AM

It would be funny :L

ElProximo 16-08-2010 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingers (Post 3666660)
Your comment about my mental health is highly offensive and should be removed either by you or a moderator.

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...ment.php?f=551

Oh I didn't say it was your mental health that anyone was concerned about.

I noticed you said:
Quote:

I do not have any favourite, and St. Dave is nothing but a charlatan who conned BB into INVITING him in, they probably thought it would be hilarious to have him lurching around in a "drunken stupor" for weeks!
Then asked about how someone would 'con' BB into INVITING them I just noticed you wrote:

Quote:

The only reason he is still in there is because the Press have a gagging order to NOT report his real life outside the house.
you alright?

fingers 16-08-2010 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 3666737)
Oh I didn't say it was your mental health that anyone was concerned about.

I noticed you said:


Then asked about how someone would 'con' BB into INVITING them I just noticed you wrote:



you alright?

You are simply insulting!

BB_Eye 16-08-2010 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 3666667)
or it could be said, offer a safe haven, shoulder to cry on, able to impart knowledge of coming off drugs/drink...but oh no, they offer these poor ex druggies/alkeys no support whatsoever !!!:sleep:

I'm not talking about drug addicts and alcoholics. As far as I'm concerned they are simply replacing one escapist addiction for another, but that's a different story altogether.

I am talking about lying to cancer patients making them think they can perform miracles and people with serious issues with their sexuality who get led into one of their bulls*** schemes that can supposedly 'rehabilitate' them.

They are on the same verministic level as those TV 'psychics' that go to great lengths deceive the grieving relatives of dead folk.

chuff me dizzy 16-08-2010 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingers (Post 3666866)
You are simply insulting!

What else do you expect ?

chuff me dizzy 16-08-2010 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BB_Eye (Post 3667127)
I'm not talking about drug addicts and alcoholics. As far as I'm concerned they are simply replacing one escapist addiction for another, but that's a different story altogether.

I am talking about lying to cancer patients making them think they can perform miracles and people with serious issues with their sexuality who get led into one of their bulls*** schemes that can supposedly 'rehabilitate' them.

They are on the same verministic level as those TV 'psychics' that go to great lengths deceive the grieving relatives of dead folk.

There is a word for them CONMEN

fingers 16-08-2010 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 3667133)
What else do you expect ?

Not a lot, just more smoke!


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.