i do think it's dumb to believe things you read.
my brother used to get these stupid magazines about yeti and werewolves and all that. urban myths and the like.

I think people should just believe what they see with their own eyes and don't expect others to believe them if it sounds far fetched.

Did he see santa too in his mags coming down from a spacecraft?

you shouldn't make fun of santa.
this is serious business you're mocking here.

if you're not careful you will get NOTHING for christmas except a lump of coal.

:hugesmile:

an orange!

Dave's other mate








































nice pic eh?

Let it be known I have not once questioned the existence of Santa Claus (or as I call him, Chris) in this thread. There isn't a shred of evidence to completely disprove him. :dance:

You've seen some articles so that proves the existence of the invisible Santa Claus :thumbs:

Tell Dave

You used the term. You know of a fossil which (much like David's reasoning) had some shape 'closer too' another kind of species and so you imagine that it was 'transitional'.
'Transforming'. That is what you are saying. Transforming.
A Dinosaur born with 'feather numbs' has 'transformed' from it's parents. the 'form' is different.
You believe that some frog-like critter transformed into Princes today. More amazingly - not just one time but over trillions of days of transforming.

But David just used the same 'science' seen today among evolutionists who may find a fossil.
The fossil is an amphibian but yet has long fins. So they imagine that this means the animal was 'transforming' (transitional) into what would become legs.
The 'evidence' is that it has longer fins. Legs are long. There ya go.

David use the same science of morphology when they saw someone whos jaw and nose was extending further out.
a 'transitional form'.
Since wolves have even longer more extended jaws then (using evolutionists reasoning) therefore, given more time, the mans nose and jaw would eventually become a snout.
Like a wolf.
The saw the 'transitional' jaw and nose so they KNOW THIS and its called SCIENCE.

BTW.. don't try and argue 'micro macro' with him because he can simply show you that 'macro' is just 'many micros'. So what argument can you make against him?

TBH - your pish is as bad as Dave's - any morphs in your contending cult?

My bit on here was showing how your Evolutionism was just as bad as Dave and belief in morphing species.

Your rapier-like wit was to just take my thing and say it back to me.
OUCH!
:whistle:

this is exactly why I like John James Dave was dribbling on and they basically all layed there he was the only one that called him up on it, once he did the others said something -whether you like John or not his the only one that doesnt think mustnt say that the public may not like it etc etc

You're such a shining wit

Dave's Santa from above:

http://www.error.gr/wp-content/uploa...-claus-391.jpg