Originally Posted by arista (Post 3791487)

"Lesbians have a terrible deformity then.. useless breasts and a lot of indoor plumbing that takes up a lot of energy for no reason?"


You are having a Laugh.


There is No God , anyway.

Originally Posted by arista (Post 3791659)

" Of course there is, he exists in the hearts and minds of man. "


So your Pathetic God gave us Hitler.

There is No God.

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 3791390)

Why do you think people are born gay?

If you think they are born gay then you are making a strong argument for some kind of retardation or medical problem:
- Either they were born with the right brain but wrong genitals,
or,
- maybe born with something wrong with their brain.

Lesbians have a terrible deformity then.. useless breasts and a lot of indoor plumbing that takes up a lot of energy for no reason?

Why would the gays have sperm production? Do you figure that is a deformity in them?

Originally Posted by Captain.Remy (Post 3791909)

we should burn them all to be honest so there won't be any debate.

except the hot lesbians tho. keep them, they might be useful in parties. :tongue:

Originally Posted by BBfan46 (Post 3791913)

You're repulsive.

Originally Posted by Shaun (Post 3791918)

BBfan46, he was being sarcastic :p as were GypsyGoth and I on the last page.

Good to see ElProximo being the cosmopolitan he always was. [this is sarcasm too, BBFan ;)]

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 3791944)

If there was a god, which I very much doubt there is...I see no reason for him/her to smite gay people down. He/she is supposedly all knowing and all loving. He probably has a few gay pornos hidden away anyway, sitting on the back of those cloudy shelves of his.

Originally Posted by BBfan46 (Post 3791905)

So 10% of the 6.7 billion have a retardation?

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 3792350)

Not anywhere close to 10% of the population chooses homosexuality. The very best research we can find may have less than 1% who can be said to actively, exclusively and be 'ongoing' in this kind of thing.

But it was YOU who may suppose they were born with a 'retardation' of either the body or the mind.



No, these do not change anything and the hand and hair still have the same point and purpose as any other.



This is baseless and we have no reason to believe 'people have been gay' since the beginning of time.
We do know that homosexuality appears throughout the recorded history of human civilization including gangs who would go about raping and murdering men.
For almost all of human history, crossing cultures and continents where we can find it practices (and mostly it is considered perverse),
but,
For the most part it is considered something you can 'do'.
Not a 'race'.
Not another 'gender'.
Not something where a type of person called 'a gay' is born.

It is a sexual interest. It could be a 'phase'. It could depend on what they were into at the time.
A Roman might be into slave girls and then at another time take a teen boy as a 'student' and sodomize him whenever,
but,
then he may be married and devoted to a wife or later they both like heterosexual orgies.

This idea you have about a kind of '3rd gender' a type of human that is born called 'A gay' who (you believe) is meant to desire same genders 'from birth' is bizarre.
It is an aberrant belief compared to human history. It is a strange new idea you are testing in just a recent generation.



No. Humans are all the same colour (it is a yellowish brown though a red tint runs through us too) and the difference is having more or less which is higher or lower in the skin,
but,
if you wanted a 'comparison' this could be like having a longer or shorter penis or bigger or smaller breasts - it doesn't change anything for the penis or breast or what it can do.



So you would agree they have a medical problem and surgery is needed to correct it.
It seems that transsexuals would agree with this idea where they were born with the wrong parts.



nonsense. it presumes a type of people called 'the gay people' and doesn't square with the best research where we see far more 'in and out' and 'back and forth' and nowhere near these strict definitions.

But even that doesn't tell us anything for your claims. Not long ago I watched a documentary (might have been C4) about 'shoe-sexuals' but the idea was exploring a surprisingly popular fetish of men who are sexually infatuated with shoes.
One was even arrested making love to Mariah Carey (the pop star) to her shoes!
Shoesexuals become so infatuated that they get to a point they cannot even become sexually aroused unless there is shoes involved. They could make love to their wife - only if she wears shoes and he can ___ the shoes,
but,
they can exclusively become aroused by shoes alone at all times.

Would you now claim they are simply a type of human.. like a 'gender' who are simply born this way?


The breast work but they are not used. We call this 'useless'. You believe that. I don't.


So you think the sperm production in this kind of 'gay human' is meant for being taken by heterosexuals?
Are they our 'cows' then?



The medieval period was a great time of medical advances, scientific advancement and progressive understanding of the natural world around us,
but,
they might have shared some views with you (and I disagree) but one of these might be that people are born with some kind of spirit that could dictate their behavior.
You believe this. You believe some babies are born as 'gay humans' and although there is no detected physical or even physiological difference - you just 'believe' some kind of 'gay spirit' will turn them into a different kind of human.
I have more progressive ideas. Youre stuck in 1982 leftist agenda myths.

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3792372)

people have sex with shoes?:laugh3:

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 3792403)

Yeah, but don't be Shoephobic about it. It is their sexuality and we have to respect them.
It isn't a choice. They were born shoesexuals and actually a lot of them have been harassed and live in shame because of societies bigotry and hate towards them.
'Retifosexuals' are just a type of human or 'gender' who happen to be attracted to shoes.

Seriously though.. it is a real thing but we just call it a psychosexual disorder or simply a 'sex fetish'.

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 3792350)

the population chooses homosexuality.

Originally Posted by Shasown (Post 3791669)

Think about what I wrote arista, it may be a little too deep for you.

Originally Posted by ElProximo (Post 3792350)

Not anywhere close to 10% of the population chooses homosexuality. The very best research we can find may have less than 1% who can be said to actively, exclusively and be 'ongoing' in this kind of thing.

But it was YOU who may suppose they were born with a 'retardation' of either the body or the mind.



No, these do not change anything and the hand and hair still have the same point and purpose as any other.



This is baseless and we have no reason to believe 'people have been gay' since the beginning of time.
We do know that homosexuality appears throughout the recorded history of human civilization including gangs who would go about raping and murdering men.
For almost all of human history, crossing cultures and continents where we can find it practices (and mostly it is considered perverse),
but,
For the most part it is considered something you can 'do'.
Not a 'race'.
Not another 'gender'.
Not something where a type of person called 'a gay' is born.

It is a sexual interest. It could be a 'phase'. It could depend on what they were into at the time.
A Roman might be into slave girls and then at another time take a teen boy as a 'student' and sodomize him whenever,
but,
then he may be married and devoted to a wife or later they both like heterosexual orgies.

This idea you have about a kind of '3rd gender' a type of human that is born called 'A gay' who (you believe) is meant to desire same genders 'from birth' is bizarre.
It is an aberrant belief compared to human history. It is a strange new idea you are testing in just a recent generation.



No. Humans are all the same colour (it is a yellowish brown though a red tint runs through us too) and the difference is having more or less which is higher or lower in the skin,
but,
if you wanted a 'comparison' this could be like having a longer or shorter penis or bigger or smaller breasts - it doesn't change anything for the penis or breast or what it can do.



So you would agree they have a medical problem and surgery is needed to correct it.
It seems that transsexuals would agree with this idea where they were born with the wrong parts.



nonsense. it presumes a type of people called 'the gay people' and doesn't square with the best research where we see far more 'in and out' and 'back and forth' and nowhere near these strict definitions.

But even that doesn't tell us anything for your claims. Not long ago I watched a documentary (might have been C4) about 'shoe-sexuals' but the idea was exploring a surprisingly popular fetish of men who are sexually infatuated with shoes.
One was even arrested making love to Mariah Carey (the pop star) to her shoes!
Shoesexuals become so infatuated that they get to a point they cannot even become sexually aroused unless there is shoes involved. They could make love to their wife - only if she wears shoes and he can ___ the shoes,
but,
they can exclusively become aroused by shoes alone at all times.

Would you now claim they are simply a type of human.. like a 'gender' who are simply born this way?


The breast work but they are not used. We call this 'useless'. You believe that. I don't.


So you think the sperm production in this kind of 'gay human' is meant for being taken by heterosexuals?
Are they our 'cows' then?



The medieval period was a great time of medical advances, scientific advancement and progressive understanding of the natural world around us,
but,
they might have shared some views with you (and I disagree) but one of these might be that people are born with some kind of spirit that could dictate their behavior.
You believe this. You believe some babies are born as 'gay humans' and although there is no detected physical or even physiological difference - you just 'believe' some kind of 'gay spirit' will turn them into a different kind of human.
I have more progressive ideas. Youre stuck in 1982 leftist agenda myths.

Originally Posted by arista (Post 3792585)