ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB11 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=551)
-   -   Josie: A twitter "country bumpkin" (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=163209)

Angus 29-09-2010 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbfan1991 (Post 3817282)
I'm not patronizing you i'm just saying her name is Josie why is it hard to type that in?, as for you disliking her i'm fine with that it's your opinion after all like I have in not liking St Ben and liking Mario:p.

Not that I have to justify myself to anyone, but I don't wish to afford her the courtesy of calling her by any other name than Dozy because it is so apt IMO, and for the simple reason that she and her chew toy did not afford us, the viewers, the courtesy of actually trying to be entertaining on the very last series ever of BB, and took us all for idiots with their ridiculously unbelievable showmance.

MeMyselfAndI 29-09-2010 04:52 PM

Josie is really popular and was entertaining get that in your head. She won with over 75% of the vote between 5 people..

Josy 29-09-2010 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kazanne (Post 3817041)
They are sleeping in separate bedrooms,pmsl,what a great relationship (not)

They are not sleeping in seperate bedrooms so why say that? they said in the magazine interviews that they share a bed, but John James also has a room for keeping his clothes and stuff in and he also goes in there to sleep if they have an argument.

On a sidenote, the name calling is getting pretty pathetic, its like little kids in a playground :bored:

Angus 29-09-2010 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josy (Post 3817406)
They are not sleeping in seperate bedrooms so why say that? they said in the magazine interviews that they share a bed, but John James also has a room for keeping his clothes and stuff in and he also goes in there to sleep if they have an argument.

On a sidenote, the name calling is getting pretty pathetic, its like little kids in a playground :bored:


So now we are not allowed to criticise so called "popular" HMs on what is a public forum which is in existence to allow everyone the freedom to post their likes and dislikes about ALL HMs? No-one is "name calling" forum members, and HMs are fair game for any amount of abuse as far as I'm concerned. .If JJ&J fans can't GET why so many of us are p*ssed off that the last ever series was ruined by these two fakers, that's not my problem. Such fans might have power on unaccountable sites like Twitter, but I refuse to be told what I can and can't legitimately post about a HM I dislike because it upsets their fans' sensibilities.

On a sidenote, what JJ&J say in mags is just toeing the party line to earn their fee - what they let slip in their tweets is far more honest and revealing. Mag interviews are as airbrushed as the unreal photos accompanying them. If JJ&J fans choose to believe it all that's up to them, as it is up to me to decide that it's all a load of complete rubbish.

Josy 29-09-2010 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by angus58 (Post 3817434)
So now we are not allowed to criticise so called "popular" HMs on what is a public forum which is in existence to allow everyone the freedom to post their likes and dislikes about ALL HMs? No-one is "name calling" forum members, and HMs are fair game for any amount of abuse as far as I'm concerned. .If JJ&J fans can't GET why so many of us are p*ssed off that the last ever series was ruined by these two fakers, that's not my problem. Such fans might have power on unaccountable sites like Twitter, but I refuse to be told what I can and can't legitimately post about a HM I dislike because it upsets their fans' sensibilities.

On a sidenote, what JJ&J say in mags is just toeing the party line to earn their fee - what they let slip in their tweets is far more honest and revealing. Mag interviews are as airbrushed as the unreal photos accompanying them. If JJ&J fans choose to believe it all that's up to them, as it is up to me to decide that it's all a load of complete rubbish.

No one said you werent "allowed" to criticise so called popular housemates did they?

Like I said in my last post, in my opinion, the name calling is childish and pathetic and just for the record im not JJJ fan.

Angus 29-09-2010 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josy (Post 3817480)
No one said you werent "allowed" to criticise so called popular housemates did they?

Like I said in my last post, in my opinion, the name calling is childish and pathetic and just for the record im not JJJ fan.

Well since it's not against any forum rules and it's just your personal opinion, I'll feel free to ignore your views.

Kazanne 29-09-2010 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josy (Post 3817406)
They are not sleeping in seperate bedrooms so why say that? they said in the magazine interviews that they share a bed, but John James also has a room for keeping his clothes and stuff in and he also goes in there to sleep if they have an argument.

On a sidenote, the name calling is getting pretty pathetic, its like little kids in a playground :bored:

Josie must be lying then as it is what she said and you know no more than I do so why say that Crabby has a room for his clothes etc,you are as much in the dark as me and are quoting from mags!.but of course you were sold a fauxmance and brought it.:joker:

joeysteele 29-09-2010 10:21 PM

I agree with kazanne and angus58,also I think when it comes to being false in anything then we can all learn that art from both John James and Josie.He in particular and then he somehow managed to transform Josie from a happy go lucky girl into being very false and unpleasant too.
How many times have we heard people after talking to papers or magazines and then sometime in the future being asked about something said in that paper or mag, the person or persons saying well that was media talk,it wasn't completely true.

Mystic Mock 29-09-2010 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbfan1991 (Post 3817254)
Obviously every housemate is going to get good and bad criticism and we ain't all going to like each others favourites:).

Every year there is a forum favourite and this year it was Ben, then Corin and Sam.. people had their reasons for liking him but hell hath no fury from some if you dared criticising them or had a different favourite if you didn't agree with the opinion that one of them 3 deserved to win BB11:p.

john james fans were worse than corins and bens combined.

joeysteele 29-09-2010 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3818549)
john james fans were worse than corins and bens combined.

100% correct jedward fever.

InOne 29-09-2010 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 3818495)
I agree with kazanne and angus58,also I think when it comes to being false in anything then we can all learn that art from both John James and Josie.He in particular and then he somehow managed to transform Josie from a happy go lucky girl into being very false and unpleasant too.
How many times have we heard people after talking to papers or magazines and then sometime in the future being asked about something said in that paper or mag, the person or persons saying well that was media talk,it wasn't completely true.

The "loveable country bumpkin" mask didn't last long with Josie, 2 weeks or something? Her nasty side first came out over the sunshine crisp things. Then she latched on to John and became a moody nasty cold cow. Then last few weeks leaped out of bed and turned on the charm again to win. She played a good game.

joeysteele 29-09-2010 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InOne (Post 3818559)
The "loveable country bumpkin" mask didn't last long with Josie, 2 weeks or something? Her nasty side first came out over the sunshine crisp things. Then she latched on to John and became a moody nasty cold cow. Then last few weeks leaped out of bed and turned on the charm again to win. She played a good game.

I would have to agree with you on this.

James 29-09-2010 11:21 PM

'Fake' is just one of these generic insults that fans of other housemates come up with to put down another HM. It has no meaning.

Mystic Mock 29-09-2010 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James (Post 3818665)
'Fake' is just one of these generic insults that fans of other housemates come up with to put down another HM. It has no meaning.

rachel rice was fake.

James 29-09-2010 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3818688)
rachel rice was fake.

How could you know? Unless you knew her before BB.

Mystic Mock 29-09-2010 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James (Post 3818692)
How could you know? Unless you knew her before BB.

who acts like that in real life? especially a teacher.

Beastie 29-09-2010 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InOne (Post 3818559)
The "loveable country bumpkin" mask didn't last long with Josie, 2 weeks or something? Her nasty side first came out over the sunshine crisp things. Then she latched on to John and became a moody nasty cold cow. Then last few weeks leaped out of bed and turned on the charm again to win. She played a good game.

A sociopath perhaps?

Nothing can get past our Joe Joe! :hugesmile:

Beastie 29-09-2010 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3818695)
who acts like that in real life? especially a teacher.

She was a "trainee" teacher at the time ;)

Mystic Mock 29-09-2010 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebeast (Post 3818703)
She was a "trainee" teacher at the time ;)

still to be a teacher you have to be more tougher than what rachel rice was betraying herself as.

Beastie 29-09-2010 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3818708)
still to be a teacher you have to be more tougher than what rachel rice was betraying herself as.

Rachel was tough and a strong young lady. She just didn't show off or purposely draw attention to herself.

InOne 30-09-2010 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James (Post 3818665)
'Fake' is just one of these generic insults that fans of other housemates come up with to put down another HM. It has no meaning.

Never used the word fake :tongue:

Kazanne 30-09-2010 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James (Post 3818665)
'Fake' is just one of these generic insults that fans of other housemates come up with to put down another HM. It has no meaning.

Fake means what it says ,they were selling us something that was NOT real,so therefore FAKE.it's not a word housemate fans have 'come up with' it has been in the Oxford dictionary for years!

] a person who makes deceitful pretenses
Synonyms: imposter, impostor, pretender, fraud, sham, shammer, pseudo, pseud, role player

Mystic Mock 30-09-2010 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kazanne (Post 3819067)
Fake means what it says ,they were selling us something that was NOT real,so therefore FAKE.it's not a word housemate fans have 'come up with' it has been in the Oxford dictionary for years!

] a person who makes deceitful pretenses
Synonyms: imposter, impostor, pretender, fraud, sham, shammer, pseudo, pseud, role player

and all that=rachel rice.

joeysteele 30-09-2010 05:42 PM

I think it was Rex who actually hemmered Rachel for prtraying herslef one way in her VT, but then playing a totally different role for the cameras in the BB house,she was therefore being false in her presentation of herself in the house or in her presentation on the VT to get into the house. They all do it to a degree but there was a massive change in the VT Rachel to the housemate Rachel.
I am not sure the fake word could be directed at Josie overall personally,but,certainly to the romance as to her and John James it could be.

Omen 30-09-2010 06:06 PM

Rachel was devious. She had one eye on Rex and the other on the cameras.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.