ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

Page 2 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)

- Announcements / Suggestions / Help (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)

- - 'Likes' (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=172167)

Niall

22-02-2011 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claymores (Post 4130318)

Can I bet 50p that one member would "like" another member's "wurk it" post and then the other member would "like" the "stunning" reply. Both of these would like every gif back from Scott in reply, then Niall would like Scott's reply and anon and anon ever self-perpetuating circle.

If that slows the flow from the server to log-it then that superfluous nonesense seems an own-goal. Slow the site for no good reason.

Equally, can I bet Novo would like Locke's posts and Locke would like Novo's posts. Or Sean would like Stu's posts and Stu would like Sean's. You can rub backs privately without logging it!

Waste of time is back-rubbing publicly..........no probs with it so long as no server issues.

But wouldn't clicking a button be less taxing on a server than a new post? :thumbs2:

Claymores

22-02-2011 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niall (Post 4130475)

But wouldn't clicking a button be less taxing on a server than a new post? :thumbs2:

Were you here wee Niall last BB evictions? Not able to talk for hours because server down. Far less you liking Scott's giffs to F the place - honest - if it can cope then fine. When busy they switch the back-hugging off

Niall

22-02-2011 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claymores (Post 4130520)

Don't be silly. I've been here during evictions and I know how busy it got but seriously you think two people could crash a server from quoting/replying each others gifs? I'm sure a server that could handle over 3 and a half thousand people at once could handle two people posting gifs/replies to each other in a chat thread let alone pushing a button.

Claymores

22-02-2011 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niall (Post 4130475)

But wouldn't clicking a button be less taxing on a server than a new post? :thumbs2:

Bluddy hell - think of it - has your non-useful except "likes", has to record it to post, record it from originator, record your positive. 3 times saying OK!

Claymores

22-02-2011 03:25 PM

Have a wee think Niall what this costs on slow TIBB

Claymores

22-02-2011 03:30 PM

Don't wanna argue, so you obviously know better - TIBB will not switch off things cos cannie cope with you - you are obviously correct - HONEST

Niall

22-02-2011 03:32 PM

I'm just saying generating a new post would obviously mean more number crunching for the server. :shrug:

But yeah I don't wanna argue either (done enough of that recently) so we'll end it here.

Locke.

22-02-2011 03:33 PM

You two take this to PM or I will have Mark ban you both.

Niall

22-02-2011 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locke. (Post 4130575)

You two take this to PM or I will have Mark ban you both.

:laugh:

Claymores

22-02-2011 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locke. (Post 4130575)

You two take this to PM or I will have Mark ban you both.

Would you "like this" as a stupid example Locke???? Waste of server space unless I like your latest eh?

Novo	22-02-2011 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by claymores (Post 4130654)

would you "like this" as a stupid example locke???? Waste of server space unless i like your latest eh?

62.50%

Claymores

22-02-2011 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locke. (Post 4130575)

You two take this to PM or I will have Mark ban you both.

Poolie R oot bad boy!

Locke.

22-02-2011 04:35 PM

There appears to be a crazy drunk hooligan in my thread

Josy	22-02-2011 04:39 PM

Stop arguing in here.

Claymores

22-02-2011 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locke. (Post 4130690)

There appears to be a crazy drunk hooligan in my thread

Yup - he opened Huns threads on sunday and still not quiet - silly Hun

Claymores

22-02-2011 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josy (Post 4130695)

Stop arguing in here.

Sory Jose -- it's a ribbing laugh, not arguing

Novo	22-02-2011 04:47 PM

A 2 week ban should sort him out Josy

Iceman

22-02-2011 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locke. (Post 4130690)

There appears to be a crazy drunk hooligan in my thread

I'm not in your thread :/

Locke.

22-02-2011 06:09 PM

You are now

Patrick

22-02-2011 07:39 PM

Claymores,
Jesus.

Liking the post isn't going to make a sever slower.
It's not as if the post will be duplicated it'll simply say '3 Like This' and you click on it to see who liked it.

Claymores

22-02-2011 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick (Post 4131193)

Claymores,
Jesus.

Liking the post isn't going to make a sever slower.
It's not as if the post will be duplicated it'll simply say '3 Like This' and you click on it to see who liked it.

I question that thought Patrick - if I "like" your post it has to be recorded on the post and your ID and my ID that it sent it. At the moment that is fine, but imagine a BB eviction evening I'm liking your post and you're liking mine.........bla bla bla. Would the TIBB server last till 10pm? When it gets back how many are you gonna like to take it out again?

Locke.

22-02-2011 08:43 PM

There isn't going to be another BB Eviction evening.

Niall

22-02-2011 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locke. (Post 4131335)

There isn't going to be another BB Eviction evening.

:worship:

Claymores

22-02-2011 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locke. (Post 4131335)

There isn't going to be another BB Eviction evening.

Goddam you're such a newshound - ever considered a spot in investigative journalism?

His name's Roger Melly........

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 AM.

Page 2 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.