what for Women to watch him strip?



Life In The City.

The fact that trolling has gained a degree of acceptance and respect on the internet (thanks to the world's most sophisticated trolling machine, Anonymous) now always reminds me of the phrase "back in my day, trolling meant something".

However I think trolling, when successful and done right, can be hysterically funny. Repeatedly posting tired catchphrases and gifs is not trolling. It's spam.

:laugh:

This

Can I make a point about gifs, surely if someone has a gif in their sig/avatar (or 4 in BB_Eyes case) then surely that's the equivalent of posting a gif everytime they post, why is it noone picks up on them, but they do whenever someone posts a gif?

Because most people who dislike .gifs dislike them for being highly repetetive, unimaginative ways of posting. Not for the amount of kb they take up.

Quite simple really, if gifs in the signature annoy other members have the choice of switching signatures off in their user CP. Unfortunately if the post in the thread is simply as a gif then other members have to view it while viewing the thread.

It may not bother you, but repeated use of gifs is not only annoying and boring but can affect other peoples computers in relation to page downlaod and cache memory.

Thats fair enough, but the reason we've been told is because they slow down the forum.
No they don't theres also the option of turning off images, people say they don't wanna turn images off, but they also say they don't wanna turn off sigs/avs

And you can clear your cache, so I don't see the problem there >.<

People are just sick of seeing gifs every other post. Its really that simple. And they shouldnt have to put up with it. Surely the people who overuse gifs can have some decent input into conversations other than an animated image? If not, then a forum is not the right place for them, perhaps try a soft play area or something...

And yes, theres the added problem of slowing down peoples computers. People shouldnt have to turn off images just because of one or two people abusing gifs. And as far as I am aware, the people who say gifs slow down their computers...already have signatures off. I know two people have :/

The whole turning off images thing is down there with the ignoring members thing. Forums should take action against things people don't like. Not instruct members to censor things for themselves.

Someone might absoloutely hate a certain member but they are never going to ignore them. It just feels odd. Show me someone who uses the ignore feature and I'll show you a liar.

Which is why they were restricted to chat and games, even then you post them you get warned, a couple of us were having a laugh in the loft the other day and Ben came in and told us to stop posting gifs. Even though there was about 5 gifs over 100 posts, and he wasn't even contributing to our conversation.

Hey at least he wasn't starting terrible music topics.

jk

Other people don't like all the gifs Smithy. You need to realise this. A couple of you may find them hilarious, but a lot of members get hacked of with the constant use of them.

Other people don't like you creating god loves the ##'s then stickying it for IthinkIloveyoutoo to spam with a whole artists discography from that decade but you don't hear us complaining.

That is not me spamming up lots of threads with a pointless GaGa gif that means nothing in context to majority of conversations. If you cannot say it in words then don't bother posting a response.

All we ask is that you cut down on them, not stop altogether, but you have to make it a drama and make it sound as if we are not allowing you to post any.

When somebody says something you don't like, replying with a gif of GaGa crying is alittle bit pointless.

Ugh fgs it's like talking to a brick wall, WE HAVE CUT DOWN, WE ONLY USE THEM IN CHAT AND GAMES!! WE USE THEM INFREQUENTLY!!! :hello: :hello: ← READ THAT PLEASE!!

And it's a joke fgs :bored:

I never said you hadn't. But not everyone has/had. I was using GaGa gifs as an example.

I'm not going to reply to that with a proper response, because apparently Im causing drama for the sake of it.

Yep. Plus I have sigs off anyway so can't see them. I don't just moan about them for the sake of it like some people love to think. The odd one or two can be funny. Being chased around the board by certain members posting them after every post I make was funny - for about 5 minutes...

Oh and while I'm at it will people stop referring to me as some kind of Claymores sidekick

Right, moan done for tonight :D

Who did that? Usually I'm called sooty's sidekick cos I don't accept nice people getting crapola and will be spiteful at idiots no matter the consequences.

In general people do, as if I can't speak for myself or something

Let's become turtle's sidekicks :thumbs::wink:

It's safer cos he's a mod awake @ 4am!!!!!!

Haha, I don't have sidekicks. And from next week I won't be online as I'm moving and don't know when I'll get access to internet again, could be a few months (hears the sigh of relief from many members). :hugesmile:

I think it is because there are only a handful in the wee small hours of the morning and it was you and me vs Novo/Locke. But as I explained on another thread, all 4 parties have reached an accomodation of talking to each other, so a 2010 issue - past. Hell - me and Shaun have even reached an accomodation not to bicker at each other today.