ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Is Smoking One Packet of Cigarettes a Month Bad? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=174217)

Pyramid* 09-04-2011 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21 (Post 4191381)
I was saying Passive Smoking is bad do you agree or not?

that's not what you were saying all along. You responded to the OP by saying that one pack of cigs a month was 'no, it's not bad / it's fine'.

that's nothing to do with passive smoking.

It's nothing to do with your comment 'not human'.

The OP was not about passive smoking so why try to go down that line. The question was quite defined.

Pyramid* 09-04-2011 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 4191392)
Smoking a pack a month is vastly inconsequential to your health I imagine. That's like what ... two thirds of a cigarette a day? Your lungs would be clearing back out the smoke far faster than you could possibly clog it up at that rate. In pure statistical terms your risk of cancer would go up, sure, but 0.66% of a cigarette a day ... seriously?

Problem is very few people can stick to one fag a day. It's incredibly difficult. This is all common knowledge surely. And TiBB is really not the best place to use as a compass to gauge what crazy directions you could next take your teenage life.

Agree. Especially in red.

michael21 09-04-2011 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyramid* (Post 4191408)
that's not what you were saying all along. You responded to the OP by saying that one pack of cigs a month was 'no, it's not bad / it's fine'.

that's nothing to do with passive smoking.

It's nothing to do with your comment 'not human'.

The OP was not about passive smoking so why try to go down that line. The question was quite defined.

It is fine see stu post

Pyramid* 09-04-2011 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21 (Post 4191412)
It is fine see stu post

yeah.....smoking is fine. All the experts are wrong. All the people who have suffered ill effects / bad health / death from smoking - they are all wrong. :pat:

Niall 09-04-2011 05:44 PM

Smoking is just bad for you. Its terribly unattractive too. D;

Stacey. 09-04-2011 05:44 PM

Smoking is bad in general, no matter how much you smoke, or how often.

Niamh. 09-04-2011 06:06 PM

It's a slippery slope Paddy, if I were you I would knock the habit on the head now before it gets worse. I wish I'd never started.

_Seth 09-04-2011 06:08 PM

Smoking still ****s with your lungs no matter how often you do it. Though obviously the less the less bad I suppose.

Smithy 09-04-2011 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 4191392)
Smoking a pack a month is vastly inconsequential to your health I imagine. That's like what ... two thirds of a cigarette a day? Your lungs would be clearing back out the smoke far faster than you could possibly clog it up at that rate. In pure statistical terms your risk of cancer would go up, sure, but 0.66% of a cigarette a day ... seriously?

That isn't the problem with cigarettes :conf2:

The chemicals in cigarettes break down the walls of the alveoli in the lungs, which means the diffusion pathway between the lungs and bloodstream is increased because the walls have been damaged, less oxygen gets into the blood which is why people suffer problems with shortness of breath...

http://www.communityoxygenservice.co.../emphysema.jpg

So, yes, in short, any smoking is bad for you and damages your lungs, but If you're going to smoke, then it's better a pack a month then a pack a week I suppose >_>


omg, my education came in handy somewhere :amazed:

Stu 09-04-2011 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 4191512)
That isn't the problem with cigarettes :conf2:

The chemicals in cigarettes break down the walls of the alveoli in the lungs, which means the diffusion pathway between the lungs and bloodstream is increased because the walls have been damaged, less oxygen gets into the blood which is why people suffer problems with shortness of breath...

http://www.communityoxygenservice.co.../emphysema.jpg

So, yes, in short, any smoking is bad for you and damages your lungs, but If you're going to smoke, then it's better a pack a month then a pack a week I suppose >_>


omg, my education came in handy somewhere :amazed:

Less chemicals means less breakdown. The lungs can repair themselves. It's one of the biggest reasons why doctors advise people to still quit because such good can come of it even if they were chronic smokers for years. You would want to have the most pissant lungs imaginable and some bad luck to boot if 240 cigarettes a year were to seriously make permanent long term inroads into destroying your health.

Besides cigarettes pose multiple possible threats of lung complications not just Emphysema which is the main problem in what you are pointing out. What makes you think my argument was only applicable to that?

joeysteele 09-04-2011 06:19 PM

Approximately only 4 cigarettes a week, I would say its highly unlikely to be taht bad, the sad thing is some people who have never smoked get cancer and other diseases while others who have smoked heavily do so into their 80s.

It's the luck, or bad luck of the draw as to who is most affected unfortunately.

Pyramid* 09-04-2011 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 4191550)
Approximately only 4 cigarettes a week, I would say its highly unlikely to be taht bad, the sad thing is some people who have never smoked get cancer and other diseases while others who have smoked heavily do so into their 80s.

It's the luck, or bad luck of the draw as to who is most affected unfortunately.

Although it's absolutely fair to say that most smokers will have health issues later on if they smoke for any length of time: it is awful when you hear of those who have lead very fit, active, smokefree, healthy lives, be hit with illnesses that are viewed as 'smoking related'. ie; Cancer, lung problems etc.

joeysteele 09-04-2011 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyramid* (Post 4191566)
Although it's absolutely fair to say that most smokers will have health issues later on if they smoke for any length of time: it is awful when you hear of those who have lead very fit, active, smokefree, healthy lives, be hit with illnesses that are viewed as 'smoking related'. ie; Cancer, lung problems etc.

I agree, of 2 of our neighbours,one smoked really heavy and drank a lot too, another never smoked in his life or drank alcohol, the smoker is now 82,still going strong the other died of Respiratory problems at aged 45.

As you say Pyramid that scenario is awful.

Smithy 09-04-2011 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 4191531)
Less chemicals means less breakdown. The lungs can repair themselves. It's one of the biggest reasons why doctors advise people to still quit because such good can come of it even if they were chronic smokers for years. You would want to have the most pissant lungs imaginable and some bad luck to boot if 240 cigarettes a year were to seriously make permanent long term inroads into destroying your health.

Besides cigarettes pose multiple possible threats of lung complications not just Emphysema which is the main problem in what you are pointing out. What makes you think my argument was only applicable to that?

Yes, they can, but it takes a lot of time, having one cigarette every few days, is still going to damage them, and doctors say that, but that still means that you aren't going to be smoking... :S

And I wasn't referring to emphysema, it was just the just the first accurate picture I saw, I didn't read the writing.

Niamh. 09-04-2011 06:37 PM

cleaned up the thread, can you stay on topic please.

Stu 09-04-2011 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 4191600)
Yes, they can, but it takes a lot of time, having one cigarette every few days, is still going to damage them, and doctors say that, but that still means that you aren't going to be smoking... :S

And I wasn't referring to emphysema, it was just the just the first accurate picture I saw, I didn't read the writing.

Well of course doctors say that. Smoking one cigarette will damage the lungs of course but you have to put a bit of perspective on it and measure the amount of damage 4 cigarettes a week is doing versus the bodies ability to repair itself.

Of course it also depends on the rest of your lifestyle. A cheeseburger a week don't mean shit if you jog every morning, playa.

Pyramid* 09-04-2011 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 4191628)
Well of course doctors say that. Smoking one cigarette will damage the lungs of course but you have to put a bit of perspective on it and measure the amount of damage 4 cigarettes a week is doing versus the bodies ability to repair itself.

Of course it also depends on the rest of your lifestyle. A cheeseburger a week don't mean shit if you jog every morning, playa.

Of course: and if someone has an 'addictive personality': they won't stick to a pack of cigs a month.

If they have asthma for example: clearly smoking any amount is not going to be fine - 4 cigs a week or not.

It's all relative.

MTVN 09-04-2011 07:50 PM

There's a lot of scare mongering when it comes to smoking but I doubt you're putting your health at serious risk doing that, the danger is really if that increases, you become addicted and start smoking a lot more.

Pyramid* 09-04-2011 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 4191784)
There's a lot of scare mongering when it comes to smoking but I doubt you're putting your health at serious risk doing that, the danger is really if that increases, you become addicted and start smoking a lot more.

it's one of the most addictive things around.....if it wasn't, it wouldn't be the massive money maker that it is.

From a long time smoker: it truly is a mugs game and it's one of the hardest things to break.

MTVN 09-04-2011 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyramid* (Post 4191800)
it's one of the most addictive things around.....if it wasn't, it wouldn't be the massive money maker that it is.

From a long time smoker: it truly is a mugs game and it's one of the hardest things to break.

Yeah I know, that's what I was saying really, the danger isnt so much in that pack of cigs a month, it's more in the addiction that has a good chance of developing.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.