![]() |
Quote:
But im at quite a good school so what i think is bad would probably be nothing compared to a lot of teens in the uk. |
Quote:
Quote:
And do you have proof that standards of literacy & numeracy has declined? That sounds like bull |
To be honest it depends on the teachers, my history/geography teacher was passionate about both subjects, he didn't just stand there and explain stuff, he used pictures, videos films, took us on trips. Compare that to say...our maths teacher, he spent most of his time chatting to the "popular ones" in the class about our nights out, he took half of the year off, he never paid any attention to the rest of the class ect.
Saying all that, I prefered learning stuff by myself after I left school |
Quote:
I did media at college, but we filmed a lot of projects (complete with a lot of paperwork), we learned studio filming, animation, stop animation ect. then of course the boring stuff. Then theres those media courses that consist of watching films and discussing them |
Well if we're not taught about it, how are we meant to know?
|
Quote:
I'm not sure why or where much of the UK Educational system has gone wrong, but it's certainly not churning out many that the nation want to be proud of (note: that's my opinion, not a statement of fact!). I agree with you Charlie, that there appears to be a tremendous amount of folk who simply 'don't care' and don't want to care either. That said, there are a few Tibbers that really impress me with their knowledge and intellect on a variety of subjects - and some have astounded me learning of their 'young' ages: so it's not all bad! Overall though: I don't see that being the norm. |
"I think the media doesn't help. People don't aspire to be scientists or pioneers any more, they want to be famous or attractive. "
Sure many are trying to get in the Fame Game a few aspire to become pioneers though. Life In The Fast Lane. |
Quote:
I guess you Google it |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.globalissues.org/article/...and-stats#src1 Quote:
:conf: Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I agree with most of your observations.....Especially the last part about basic skills......Personally I don't think it matters if kids know about Royalty history........Very boring to most and mostly pointless.... However like you say basic skills are under valued in the education system.To much time spent on pointless academic stuff that will never be needed and only taught so as some can go to universiaty simply for the status symbol of being at university.......Rather than being educated with something usefull...... A lot more go to university true.......But do most deserve to be there when they can't even boil an egg......I think not...... Universities should be for the scientist, chemists doctors etc.....Not for pshcho babble and other pointless obscure subjects which can be taught at your local education evening classess or while walking the dog in the park..... Kids need to taught how to cook how to do basic handman jobs and repairs. More importantly how to behave like resposible human being that don't abuse fellow human beings with drug taking and binge drinking episodes.... |
There is no getting around the fact that the UK's education system is failing. People leave school not knowing who we fought in the Second World War, the official state religion of Great Britain, who Napoleon is and unable to find Britain on a world map. Plus the country's literacy rate is in decline. This should be a national scandal.
The problem is the powers that be are so short-sightedly utilitarian and see no value in things that won't make you a quick buck, they think that since most children won't grow up to be historians, philologists or archaeologists, then there is no point in teaching them anything more than the most elementary general knowledge (if that) and anything more than that is a luxury. Just look at how little people care that the coalition government is doing everything in its power to dismantle this institution. Education is there to teach people to read, write and think. |
Quote:
|
Mary Queen of Scots, my historical heroine is in fact in my view a very strong and relevant part of English Royal family history
She was a direct descendant of the Tudor dynasty, she therefore had a strong claim to the English throne, much more so than Elizabeth 1. She was in my view, wrongly imprisoned and tried due to Elizabeth 1 and she was then murdered by Elizabeth 1. Her strong relevance to English Royal Family history is further borne out by the fact her son James V1 of Scotland became James 1 of England after Elizabeth 1 death. I do agree though that some things seem to have been withdrawn from Education that are important. How anyone can understand a culture or what formed a Nation without being taught its full History is hard to work out. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.globalissues.org/article/...and-stats#src1 Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I have never changed my own curtains
-Feels ashamed- But yeah, I agree mostly with what you are saying, although I really dont think royal history is of that much importance tbh |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.