ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB8 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=569)
-   -   Hearing rumbles of vote to save (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=181195)

who_r_the_housemates 13-08-2011 04:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba (Post 4462783)
Maybe having 2 votes- one to save and one to evict, then taking the cumulative votes for each HM to see weather they go or stay.:wavey:
I agree, I’ve thought this for a long time and everyone votes for different reasons and we don't all want the same type of winner, by using this method it would be more balanced because-
With the save, the more controversial livelier characters have more chance of remaining leaving quieter ones vulnerable. But on the other hand with a vote to evict, the quieter ones are usually ‘nicer’ characters and have (going by record if they make it to the final) a bigger chance of winning. Reduce the voting cost so that people are more inclined to vote both ways. Everyone's happy :D

who_r_the_housemates 13-08-2011 04:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suze (Post 4462907)
So did I. I liked Rachel and was happy that she won :)
This.

Shaun 13-08-2011 05:18 AM
it's not a perfect system but it's better than the current one

Saph 13-08-2011 09:29 AM
After last years horrible finale this is great news :D

georgehudson 13-08-2011 10:14 AM
Brilliant news. However, I hope the results are still announced like they used to be, not "the first person safe is..."

Patrick 13-08-2011 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobnot (Post 4462814)
Nope i dont like the idea of it.
Too predictable it takes away the element of the underdog standing a chance and thats one of the things thats made bb a success. the underdogs go early before having a chance to change peoples minds about them it would be dumbing down for bb predictable and boring thats what you get with vote to save.

People like marcus bb10 would never have survived people didnt like him at the start he came across as arrogant until you got to know his character nobody would have voted to save him early on.

same goes for:
science
nasty nick
victor
jason

the list goes on all legends that never would have happened with vote to save.
You do have somewhat of a point :suspect:.
I only agree because you mentioned Victor, Jason and Marcus.

georgehudson 13-08-2011 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBDodge (Post 4462818)
I voted for Rachel loads. And that was a positive vote in the final.
You disgust me. :bored:

Patrick 13-08-2011 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgehudson (Post 4463396)
You disgust me. :bored:
This. :idc:

Patrick 13-08-2011 10:19 AM
I hope they do the 'The first person safe, IS..' thing if there's more than 4 people up. :love:

It was so tense, when they do it on IAC it's like :bawling: because it's quite scary.

I remember when they did it last year briefly and they said Shabby was safe and Caoimhe and Sunshine weren't and I was like 'OMG YES!' and started yelling everywhere, I was so into BB11 for the first few weeks LOL.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:29 AM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.