Strategy/Tactics > personality and boring people.

US trumps UK

im from the uk and love the usa version much more, its not only drama but strategy and tactics as well, there are also lots of crazy housemates too

bbus>bbuk

The British version has just become a laugh and feel superior to the HMs show, reaching its nadir this year. It's not about true personalities because most people only seem interested in caricatures. The American version definitely felt superior and even more real than the British version this year, and that just shows how much things have changed.

I so agree.. I would also like to see BBUK stop the bad language,every other word is a curse word,it's like a disease....I don't think there is a need for it.:nono:

UK without a doubt. I haven't really liked a US season since 7.

The US Version is 100% Rubbish that panders to brain dead people. The UK version is far superior.

Hello! We too are watching BBUK for the first time and I must say we love it. Also, watching from the US.
I prefer the UK version hands down. Like other comments a blend of the two would be perfect. Broadcast every night? Brilliant! The US version is highly edited and only on 3 nights a week...lame. (That pisses me off about Survivor too, once a week? It could be so much better).
I love the crazy tasks they give the UK housemates VS the US competitions but again a little of both would be great.
Amazing, the amount of money spent. Don't think I'd go so far as to spend money on votes though.
Oh, and the Celebrity BB...damn! Love that Paddy!

I think emotions run higher in BBUSA because they are battling each other and lying to each other.

Uk 100 times better < i live in the usa and this is my first season of bbuk it towers over yhe usa version

For the people who call BBUSA rubbish I'd ask them to find one episode of BBUK that is as entertaining and dramatic as BBUSA Season 6, episode 18. Anyone who hasn't looked into BB USA should watch this episode and, even without the backstory, if they're not impressed then BB USA is not for you. I think this episode blows anything BBUK out of the water.

BB US Season 6 was the best season ever.

Janelle was amazing that season.

That season alone>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BBUK combined

As a Canadian who has the US BB broadcasted to my TV each year...I hate it. I don't watch it, and can't stand to be in the room to hear it when my wife watches it. It seems so fake, edited, scripted, and full of actors.

I have been downloading BBUK from bit torrents since the year Anthony won

Canadian too, and while I can agree that BBUS Season 6 was good, it has really been all down hill from there.
I far Far FAR prefer UK over US. US has become too predictable with alliances from day one setting the stage for the outcome every time.
What I like best about UK is the people's vote ( that I wish I could be apart of b/c if I had Harry would not have left), the not discussing nominations (which didn't apply this year), and the after shows. The only thing US beats UK in is challenges are more intense.
One last note, with UK I am addicted from the beginning, but once it gets down too the final 5, it becomes boring. With US, I can usually skip the first half of the season and still get everything I need from it for entertainment out of the last 1/3 b/c that's when it ramps up.

The only season that I would call too predictable was season 12 with the brigade. Last year there were no close votes. This season there were many close votes and there was more fighting. Who could have predicted Shelly would backstab her favorite houseguest ever, Jeff? Who could have predicted she would vote for Rachel to win Big Brother and be the swing vote to do so? Rachel making it to the final 2 is almost a miracle.

Thiiiiiiiiiiiiissss

http://operagasm.com/wp-content/uplo...era-singer.jpg

was ruined by the fact Maggie won :bored:

This is a tough one for me to answer. I see positives and negatives in each format.

I think generally speaking, the UK version does a better job of picking more interesting housemates. The 8 non-all star housemates in this last US season had the personality of boiled cabbage. I think you could randomly pick people off the street and end up with a better show 99 times out of 100.

I LOVE how the UK version gets put on 7 nights a week and then has BoTS and other shows that spend a lot of time talking about BB. It really feels like (at least from an outsider's perspective) that BB is more widely known and discussed in the UK.

Personally, I enjoy the strategic aspect of the US version way more. In the UK it is seen as a negative if you are thought to be "playing the game" or if you have a gameplan. Since when is it a negative quality to want to do well at things?

I also like how it's possible to remove yourself from the eviction vote by winning a competition, however it has been pretty obvious recently how easy it is for the production staff to stack the odds in favor of selected housemates. Without question, that is a HUGE negative of BB US if you are operating under the assumption that it is a "reality" show. Then again, BB UK has had it's share of blatant manipulation through editing as well. Actually, now that I think about it, BB AU was pretty bad about this too. I suppose it's too much to ask to have a true reality show that hasn't been edited to show someone's idea of what reality should be.

I do like how the UK version allows you more potential to see the real personalities of the housemates. In the US version they are almost always playing the game, and while, as I said above, I don't think that's a bad thing, there is definitely something to be said for just observing the social aspect of the situation.

Obviously the down side of the US version is that it's entirely possible for the "wrong" person to win. At least with the UK version, the majority of the viewers will be happy with the outcome. In the US, it's possible that almost nobody will be happy with the winner. Someone mentioned S6 and one of the last great seasons, and I do agree, but even in that great season, the winner was one of the most disliked housemates in BB history.

I don't know what the perfect BB solution would be like. I do like it when BB UK allows their housemates to talk about discussions. It does have a more US/strategy feel to it, but I can see where, if the public still has 100% control over who goes, all the strategy in the world isn't going to matter. Personally, my favorite series of any BB I've watched was BBUS 8 with Evel Dick and America's housemate. The public had just enough say in that season, by controlling one player's votes/actions that the "right" housemate won while still having tons of gameplay and strategy. Maybe something like that might work for the next series of BB UK.

Wow, you think the British version caters to an intelligent audience?

Never watched a single second of footage from the US show nor do I intend to. It just doesn't interest me.

Unfortunately it will never work the same way as it did at the beginning. All of the contestants now are too aware of the media attention they hope to get after the show and most of them are in for the after show benefits.

I have enjoyed this series because it has been a lot of strategy and tactics but not as obvious as the US version.

As long as a section of the viewers still believe that any of the HMs are being real and vote for them for that reason it will probably not change much from what it is at this point. Which is a good thing. Those of us who enjoy the strategy and tactics and see the HMs for what they are doing get what they want and those who don't see it get what they want out of the show.

Not this year, it was a crap selection. And on top of that they are just presented as caricatures in a comedy anyway.

Less so than it used to be.

Not necessarily, Victor was appreciated for instance. But too many of the gameplayers have no originality, and the show is just presented as a comedy where all the HMs are just a joke anyway.

It's never been a show completely about 'reality'. However reduce it to caricature like the British version has become and it just looks trash.

I think there is some social aspect to the American version. And the British version is not interested in real personalities, it didn't pick people that are that complex this year, and as in every year it just presents them as caricatures.

You'll never please everyone with the winner in whatever version. There have been winners in the British version who most of the audience might not have liked that much and certainly wanted their other favourites to win more. Also remember not all those who watch vote, most people probably don't vote. And the show is surely about the series as a whole and not simply who is the last one.

There is strategy in both versions. And though they can't discuss nominations in the British one they can still heavily influence indirectly by saying to someone they like or dislike this HM or that group etc.

I like the usa version better.
The head of house is great and the food is done better.Plus i like veto too and the drama it brings.
But i like our way of nominating more.I think a mix would be perfect.Say if the hoh was imune and put 1 housmate up for eviction and everyone else voted like normal and vote 2 more.so 3 are up and the audience save 1 and then the house evicts 1 out of the 2 left.
I am fed up of uk housemates bum licking eachother for the whole show in fear of looking bad on the outside.This way they will be forced to play the game a bit more.

I forgot to say that they actually did this in the 10th (previous) series of the British version, unfortunately they scrapped it in this latest and I think weaker series.

I don't think people disliked Maggie it's just that people liked the Soverign alliance better. Ivette was, hands down, the face of everything that people hated about the Friendship alliance. Ivette should have taken Janelle to the final 2 and evicted Maggie if she wanted a better shot at winning. Like James said, she chose friendship with someone she knew for 2 months over 450 thousand dollars.