Locke. |
04-01-2012 03:04 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTsHuge
(Post 4843665)
What is there to get "into"? the man kept calling Evra a "N#gro" so what is there to discuss? :roll: oopps i forgot that somehow the word is "different" in South America so he should get away with it over here!! :joker: ,
Liverpool are a disgrace from top to bottom and if Suerez was so "innocent" they wouldn't be waving the white flag over his ban right now!!.
|
Well what do you know guys... it really is huge. A huge idiot.
After the game Evra told whiskey nose that he had been called it 3 times, then it changed to 5, and now I believe it is 7 or more. According to Suarez called him all kinds and not just the one word, and there is no proof of it at all. From the FA documents:
When the referee blew his whistle to stop play, Mr Evra spoke to Mr Suarez and said (in English) "Don't touch me, South American". Mr Suarez replied "Por que, negro?". He says that he used the word “negro” in a way with which he was familiar from his upbringing in Uruguay. In this sense, Mr Suarez claimed, it is used as a noun and as a friendly form of address to people seen as black or brown-skinned (or even just black- haired). Thus, it meant "Why, black?" Mr Suarez maintained that when he said "Por que, negro?" to Mr Evra, it was intended in a conciliatory and friendly way. Mr Suarez said this was the only time that he used the word “negro” in his exchanges with Mr Evra during the match.
I believe someone who isn't a proven liar over someone who is.
And the FA, well, this picture says it all:
http://i44.tinypic.com/fom1ox.jpg
|