| pinkpanther |
24-01-2012 04:31 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott
(Post 4903201)
when people say that the most entertaining people should win but it always the 'dull' ones that end up winning, well i kind of agree with this now because the dull ones are always nice so they win as a reward for being nice, i understand that they are kind of pointless in the sense that they bring nothing at all to the series, but what does it matter where the entertaining people finish as long as they are in there right up until the final?
this is why im now supporting denise i was rooting for the twins to win at first then i realized i love them as housemates but i really dont like them as people so as long as they are in until the end to entertain thats all that matters, they shouldnt win just for being entertaining thats not what its about imo
|
you are 100% confused and 100% wrong
nice is a meaningless word. the winner should be the most honest person
honest doesnt necessarily mean nasty or nice it just means plain honest , when saying something nice or complimentary or something direct and insulting
michael is literally miles and miles more honest than any housemate ever.
thats why he is the funniest often the kindest and often the nastiest too
hes always honest so anyone who is offended by honesty is not nice but a fake boring shallow. if mikey praises you, you best believe its been earned |
