Absolutely,as you say there will also be men serving time for something not committed too, those accused of rape often spend a fair time kept on remand too while waiting for a trial then the charges being dropped when the accuser was found to be lying, with no apology given to the guy either,even after he has had his name in the papers too.

which in my view means this woman should have had the book thrown at her for inventing this.

when you think of rape its of a man rapeing a women.
there are cases where women make up rape alligations for one reason or another,
all rape alligations need to be investigated.
what needs to change is the fact that a mans details are made public
if the police feel that he is a serious risk than he should be kept on remand until his trial.
this crime cuts both ways there are women that have been raped gone to trial only to see their attacker go free.


but its in part the news papers fault beacuse they print rape alligations on the front page to sell papers most recent, dane bowers

:bored:

if you have got nothing to say dont say anything:nono:

Exactly, as in this case, the man had to leave his job and now everyone knows intimate details of his sex life as well.

this thread is strange in that women feel so strongly that she should get more prison time.
if the law was changed then at least his name and details would remain private unless he was found guilty.

Why would you think that's strange? Rape is a horrendous crime, really horrible and women who cry rape falsely, make it more difficult for genuine victims and also, I can imagine it must be a really terrible thing for a man to be wrongly accused like that, it could ruin his whole life even if he's proved innocent. Women like that give genuine women a bad name.

i dont see it like that
each case is different and you cant just throw it in one pot
her sentence was for lieing about being raped which is bad but it happens,
if you sleep with strangers you are taking a risk
if the law was changed then maybe his life and others would not be ruined,
you cant say just beacuse one women lied every other rape case will be viewed the same.

Well, a person is either raped or they consented, I don't think there's an in between there.

I do agree that people should not be named while the alleged crime is being investigated though.

They need to get that law sorted where the person who is accused name isn't given to the public until they've been convicted

This kind of news make me really mad! Has this woman got no shame?

I concur.

Though The Sun would go into meltdown. They shift copies off the back of inciting hatred upon accused pedophiles and rapists.

she was actually raped, she just retracted it because she wanted to protect her abuser. it's classic stockholm syndrome.

it's disgusting that people are demonizing her when infact she is actually a rape victim, she's just so brainwashed that she's protecting her rapist. cases like this are very common.

Of course.

Why didn't we all think of this.

*thumps forehead with heel of hand*

I can't personally go along with this,if that is the case two wrongs don't make a right, she cannot be given credit for protecting someone who raped her while setting out to destroy the life of some innocent guy who didn't.

I think setting out to do that to someone,whether temporarily or seeing it through to the end, warrants some demonizing of her actions.

when she get out will she be on clebb bb :suspect:

Absolute rubbish.

Sket.

Right, so she protected her "rapist" by reporting him to the police and making rape claims about him - which were proven to be false by people professionally trained in that field? All right, then. Now, look, I'm not at all saying this to be rude, but your argument here contains loads of flaws. All you ever did here was make claims, without offering any form of substantiation whatsoever and cleary ignoring what's actually been reported in the article.

Yeah she didn't retract her accusation, the police spent £14,000 and 376 hours investigating it before it became clear she was lying

Good trolling brah.

You all are soo off the mark. False rape accusations are INCREDIBLY rare. ACTUAL rape is incredibly common. Actual rape CONVICTIONS are also incredibly rare.

So? I'm sorry but I fail to see your point. No one's debating that false rape accusations are incredibly rare (although, yet again, if you haven't any valid proof, that's not a fact, but that's not the context of our discussion right now); rather, I don't agree with your ridiculous idea that this incident doesn't fit in that category. If she was a genuine rape victim, why would she just go with the flow? Don't you think she wouldn't rest until justice was served? She cheated on her boyfriend and agreed to meet up with a guy she hadn't seen before and you want me to feel sorry for her? Was she being raped when she went onto a chatroom? Was she forced? True, she regretted it in the end, but she then went onto making up false accusations about a guy she started a fling with. Surely, this should tell you that she's a stupid bitch and deserves no sympathy.

umm, a woman or man has the right to say NO at any point. just because you agree to sex at first does not mean that he can do anything to you he likes, she can say NO at any point, and it is still just as much rape. ANY unwanted sex is rape, just because you agree to sex at first does not mean you cannot say STOP whenever you want to.

That's all very true but it doesn't apply in this case. She made up a story that he attacked her on her way home from the gym which has been proven un true by the Police.