Either way, I'd still play sex games with her.

Make sure there are no sharp implaments to hand first ...

Just about to respond to Alex's comments but won't bother considering he's brought up xenophobia again. :rolleyes:

Everyone hates Amanda because she's American? lol. Whatever.

And, yes Kizzy I agree, doing cartwheels when you've been arrested on suspicion of murdering your friend is definitely some kind of sociopathic personality.

I don't see how you could explain it away that she was innocent and therefore didn't have to worry about going to jail, her friend was still killed.

Shameless. Maxim are just after publicity.

they are a magazine, it's what they need to be after

murder of her friend that she'd only known for 3 weeks. She had just moved in, and 3 weeks later this happened. how could she possibly know that the italian and british tabloids would make it into this huge thing? It was her first time away from home, the whole thing must have been incredulous to her.

You have no idea how you'd react in the same situation. What did you expect her to do? Break down in a puddle of tears over someone she vbarely knew, in a place you don't know?

She was trying to get through it the best she could, a situation that had nothing to do with her.

Do you even know the names of her other 2 roomates?? i don't. They didn't live alone, so why is it only the American that got blamed? and the idea that an american is a satanic witch performing sex rituals?? are you kidding?

The entire case a was a farce from beginning to end, which is WHY she was found INNOCENT> she wasn't just found not guilty, she was found INNOCENT.

yes, but not as shameless as the Daily Mail and other British magazines that printed Amanda's face for 4 years, demonizing an innocent girl.

Are Casey Anthony & OJ innocent as well Alex?

I'm not entirely sure if she was guilty or not but I think there is a very strong case to say she was, I think this article gives a pretty good overview of reasons why she might be guilty or innocent, and the reasons in favour of being guilty are a lot more convincing to me http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...asons-why.html

there is evidence against both of those epople, they are not guilty in the eyes of the law because guilt could not be proven, but they were not found INNOCENT, they were found not guilty, which just means there was not enuf evidence to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt. There is a HUGE difference between being found not guilty and being found innocent.

Amanda knox was found innocent. There is not a SINGLE SHRED of evidence linking her to this crime at all. If you know of any such evidence i suggest you provide it to the italians, because i'm sure they'd love to reopen the case.

well i guess the telegraph is more sophisticated than the italian justice system. i've read the telegraph before and i think that is QUITE an assumption. lol.

but hey, what you think doesn't mean anything, because you are not a lawyer, yur a conspiracy theorist. have fun with your conspiracies, and thank gawd yu are not in any position of power.

Oh ffs, you're impossible to have any reasonable debate with

You were just going on about what a "farce" the case is and now you're lauding the Italian justice system?

You obviously didn't read the article either

lol, i was not lauding the italian justice system at all. Being more sophisticated than the Telegraph is not a high achievement. :hugesmile:

Well there is obviously some debate over her innocence, I don't see how I am a conspiracy theorist when I even said "I'm not entirely sure if she was guilty or not"

well if you don't think there is a conspiracy, then why was she found innocent? If you believe she is guilty, then i assume you believe there is a conspiracy as far as you think the American government got involved in some way to ensure her release. that is a conspiracy theory.

Because courts can sometimes get it wrong, presumably you thought they were wrong to find her guilty originally, so were you a "conspiracy theorist" when you thought that?

no, because i didn't claim it was a conspiracy, i said i just think the tabloids influenced the first trial, and i think xenophobia against Americans influenced the first trial. as Italy does not sequester jurys, the jury was free to read all of the tabloid trash during the entire trial.

It was a failure of the Italian justice system, but thankfully the Italian justice system has a much more legitimate appeals process. in fact the appeal was more professionally executed than the original trial. imo.

It's also important to remember that Italy has the exact opposite justice system to the US and UK, in that you are presumed guilty until proven innocent.

I'm not claiming it was a conspiracy either, I just think there wasn't enough evidence to be sure and the Italian police made serious mistakes during their investigation so they couldn't be 100% confident to uphold the verdict, but I don't rule out the possibility that she did do it, the Kercher family are still waiting for justice and still don't know what happened that night

Well the Kerchers do know what happened that night. A man named Rudy Guede (who has a past history of knife violence) broke into meredith's room, then raped and killed her.

The man that killed their daughter is already in jail serving a sentence for his crime against their daughter.

If they cannot accept the truth, well that is unfortunate for them. Amanda should not be punished for the sake of the Kerchers though.

If she's completely insane that makes her even hotter.