Originally Posted by Flamingjoe (Post 5387413)

I think if they're going to carry on vote to save, they need to have three or more nominees each week.

Originally Posted by Black Dagger (Post 5387464)

Only ****ing morons would want back V.T.E.

Which is pretty much 97% of viewers, so yeah, it probably will be back. :bored:

Originally Posted by Mollie. (Post 5387392)

People are doing that though. Hence why we had Caroline (who no way should've lost against the likes of Ashleigh etc...) getting evicted in a vote to save with 7 other people. There was no way she should've gone that week people were just voting tactically to get her out

Originally Posted by Black Dagger (Post 5387464)

Only ****ing morons would want back V.T.E.

Which is pretty much 97% of viewers, so yeah, it probably will be back. :bored:

Originally Posted by Gillian-73 (Post 5387537)

The poll on DS says it all. Over 200 wanting VTE and only 50 odd VTS.

Originally Posted by Black Dagger (Post 5387677)

Oh dear.

How irritating.

V.T.S was the best thing C5 ever did. :bored:

Originally Posted by mkbb (Post 5387675)

If VTE was brought back I would stop watching the show. What they need to do is have three or more people up each week making use of it.

Originally Posted by Mollie. (Post 5387392)

People are doing that though. Hence why we had Caroline (who no way should've lost against the likes of Ashleigh etc...) getting evicted in a vote to save with 7 other people. There was no way she should've gone that week people were just voting tactically to get her out

Originally Posted by pcro (Post 5387314)

Gotta keep vote to save. While vote to save to does not guarantee keeping controversial or big personalities in the house, vote to evict just about guarantees they go. In a two person eviction it doesnt seem to make much difference. But in a multiple person eviction, vote to save gives controversial people who divide the audience a much better chance at staying. last year vote to save made a huge difference for aaron who, like himor not, was about the only thing interesting in that house.

Originally Posted by MeMyselfandI (Post 5388065)

Exactly, Jay or Alex would of won last year otherwise &the final would of been Jay, Alex, Louise & Aden/Tom :bored:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 5388073)

No chance would Jay have been anywhere near the final with vote to evict D:

But Alex would almost definitely have won it.

Originally Posted by armand.kay (Post 5387485)

Its because bb kept opening and closing the lines, I'm sure she had more voted than Luke S before the opened the lines for the last time.

Originally Posted by MeMyselfandI (Post 5388074)

The voting freezing screwed Caroline over, everyone quickly voted to save Luke S to evict her, not voting to save..

Originally Posted by Mollie. (Post 5388091)

Ah I didn't actually know that, only saw the actual eviction didn't see the rest of the episode. Appalling that they did that tbh :bored:

But even so it does prove the whole tactical voting with VtS exists, because if it didn't then reopening that vote wouldn't have made a difference anyway.

Originally Posted by bobnot (Post 5388098)

Of course it did.
Because she was dead popular afterall :pat: :crazy::crazy::crazy:

Originally Posted by MeMyselfandI (Post 5388105)

They reopened the lines with the bottom 4: Conor, Ashleigh, Luke S & Caroline for ten minitues which screwed her, but she still had a chance & then they reopened the lines again with the bottom 2; Luke S & Caroline which evicted her. I think she would of came 3rd or 2nd from bottom and survived had Big Brother not done this.