Oh and I bet jasmine's parents are REAL proud of her!

Incidentally, just how is danica meant to check men's marital status before she interacts with them?

So Jasmine, a woman who has affairs with high profiled men, celebrity or not, is worse than Danica a model who charges fans to interact with her in a non-sexual, non-physical way on the internet?

I understand what she does and it doesn't sit 100% with me BUT while as a wife I would be uncomfortable if my husband was buying this model gifts, I like it better than him *******ing her.

Cheaters reasoning rarely lies with the person who has tempted them or whom they have cheated with, it tends to lie with the cheater themselves and while I do think that what Danica does can be misconstrued and can possibly hurt some people in their personal lives, at least she's not out there entering into physical relationships with them.

Many of these men and women are filthy rich anyways, so we're looking at a certain caliber to begin with.

At the end of the day, the point of this thread is that she lost her mom, whether yesterday, 5 weeks ago or 5 years ago, to a disease that can take a lot from families. Yes Jasmine didn't know but comments like that hit below the belt and she knows it. She's more than proud of being the 'nasty bitch' type. Let someone say something derogatory towards her child and you'll see.

And btw, The Situation is NOT innocent. Mike ain't dumb. He knows how to play and be vindictive just like the rest. Clearly some of you don't watch Jersey Shore.

Jasmines 'moral code'???
:joker::joker::joker::joker::joker:

Im not talking about cheating, Im talking about spending money on an internet slut. Im not giving anyone a free pass, I am saying if these gold diggers didnt exist maybe they would spend the money in more important ways.

What if your man was buying big ticket items for an internet Himbo and not spending the time or money on you? Or if you had a family with him? How would you feel?

It is not as simple as everybody wants it to be, scratch a little deeper and look at the potential social implications this may have. Those that simply chuck it up to "So what she gets free stuff from people, its not her fault they buy it for her" are sadly mistaken and ignorant, or simply too young and inexperienced. I say flip it around and place yourself on the other side of the story.

Perhaps my stance is also on the other extreme, but I like to put things in perspective and look at all angles and depths, not just the easy surface.

Where in my post do I defend Jasmine and when did I bring up the situation??? :conf:

But since you are on that tangent, the situation is a vile pig of a person and is acting all innocent to the cameras. I nearly lost it when he said, he never lies LOL. Those of us that know him arent falling for it at all but until I get to know the rest, he is the only one I know from before entering the house.

I never said Jasmine was an innocent, she is quite vile but you see her coming. Wow, your question amazes me! So she is innocent in all this because she doesnt know marital status?... WOW!!

But again, you are not looking at the big picture but focusing on the littlest thing, the tiniest scrap of what I've said.. Its cool though. :xyxwave:

I am not young, ignorant or inexperienced and I don't feel that danica will unravel the fabric of society.
Men who want to go to peep shows will, they always have since the year dot.
there are lapdancing clubs, 'massage' parlours, phone chat lines and porn channels... they all cost money and it can all be debated till the cows come home as to where they sit on the morality scale.
However to single out one woman to lay the title of 'internet slut' on I dont feel is deserving or fair.

But your 'point' has no relation to this thread what-so-ever.

This is your opinion mr wong and far from what i really said, your summary is really creative, I specially like the "guys are stupid and gullible" part. Nothing to do with what I said at all.

But Im not going to argue with you Wong, Im fine with everyones opinion and im not interested in changing that. Just posting my point and opening it for debate as it is an interesting one. No need to make it personal, so deep breath and stop rolling your eyes.

Yes, we've stablished that already... Sorry to the OP for diverting the topic.

still fail to see how what Danica does for a living is morally wrong.

Nope, not my opinion. It was an opinion given in this thread.

If my comment was aimed at you i'd have quoted you. As it wasn't aimed at you, or even about you, i didn't quote you.

Good point, Of course is not just her, one woman cannot destroy society, nor can a million. I agree that there are lots of diversions for men and women these days and I dont claim to be the morality police, but some things are clearly immoral. The reason we are talking about her is because she knowingly has put herself in that position by entering the house and people will opine.

I dont tend to call people names on here but internet slut fits her, however I will stop.. i admit its not nice.

My bad then Wong, sorry