Really. You think that's funny? I guess you do as you had to express yourself with an emoticon.

The difference between Nina and Jasmine is that Nina is a successful journalist who's built a career and is respected by her peers. Jasmine, on the other hand, is a nasty little grommet who shagged and insulted her way to some kind of notoriety. And you think it's funny that Jasmine, the psychotic non-entity, is given a platform by Channel 5 to say something profoundly nasty to Nina? I really do worry that Jasmine is being held up as a role model and "entertainer" by people unable to make a better judgement.

because as "edgy" BOTS tries to pretend to be, because omg they make sex jokes!!! they won't allow actual confrontation.

Emma willis said penis!!! omgg!!! tee hee hee. OMG i can't believe she just made a sexual joke!!! it's soo high school.

I too wondered if that was the case. Nina Myscow would leave Jasmine hanging in ribbons, so no, I can't see her voluntarily walking away either.

Brians questions are scripted, but Emma's, for the most part, aren't. She goes with the flow off the audience and the panel. And speaking of which, the panel and the audience are free to ask the questions they want.

As for acting like judge and jury, isn't that what Jasmine did in the house to others?

All in all, it was a very tame interview.

Nina Myskow is a respected journalist who has been around a long time. Her comments were based on personal experience of Jasmine. How they both had been on a reality show together and that Jasmine had been booted out for being rude, aggressive and b*tchy. This on the eviction night where Jasmine had been booted out of BB for being rude, aggressive and b*tchy. There is a trend there...

When questioned on Ninas comments, all Jasmine had was a rude, aggressive and b*tchy retort.

Should people pull punches when dealing with people like this? Or, as Rhian pointed out in the DR, should everyone walk on egg shells around them, for fear of what happens?

Her comments in the sweaty box were no different to anything else the woman says. And the sad fact is that she will continue to say them until someone points it out.

While BB isn't the perfect place for sorting out the obvious issues that the woman has. There was scope for a harder interview.

Yeah, she does say things to peoples faces, but she obviously can't handle things been said back. So we are back to the rude, aggressive and b*tchy point...

I'd say they had a deliberate policy to go easy on her in case she had a complete meltdown live on TV and things got out of hand. can't say I blame them in a way. She is extremely volatile and while she can give it she definitely can't take it.

I pity her poor son growing up with a mother with so many issues, poor kid doesn't stand a chance - she better start saving for his therapy now!

Agree with everything you have said Lavia. I also think they should have insisted Nina stay and confront the evil woman but then again would Nina have said anything? I recall when Caroline was booted out and Nina was on BOTS that night. Nina criticized Carolines behaviour but when it came to asking Caroline a question it was something silly and not at all related to how Nina criticized her. Some of the guests on the BOTS panel seem to be as two faced as some of the HMs. Guns blazing with their disgust of a certain evicted HM but a different ball game when it comes to questioning them. Duhhhhhh.

no there was one guest that left when she came on the show

Nina Myskow

Did you watch the show? ..... Jasmine's comment was made after Nina called her a "cuckoo clock". I make no apologies for my sense of humour, it tickled me, and I thought it fair comment after Nina had likened Cheryl to a "side board" and Jasmine to a "cuckoo clock" in a bizarre homage to Julian and his "occasional table". Please don't worry about my judgement, that is entirely my business, and as a poster with zillions of posts you must know the rules by now about discussing HMs, not fans.

I thought she handled the whole eviction process and post eviction interviews quite well. She handled all the questions OK and there seemed no repeat of any of the behaviour she showed in the house.

However if you look closely all the signs were still there, the hesitant shaky answers the nervous disposition, the general ill at ease was obvious for all to see. I'm glad she came out when she did because any longer in there and I think they would have probably had to go in and forcibly remove her. She clearly has issues and yet again similar to Caroliar from the main serious she should never have got past the interview stage.

How many more HM with pre-existing mental health issues are they going to put into the House in the quest for entertainment and high ratings.

Yes, I agree, Nina had her well sussed, why was she not on the panel when she was in front of them, notice that she had been moved to somewhere else. She is a rude ignorant b.....! Imagine knowing someone like that in the real world, urrggh, well you wouldnt, cos she cant possibly have any friends, only her mum, I suppose she had to be there to support her, but must be well embarrassed, or maybe she is similar, and its normal learned behaviour. Her poor son, pity him as he grows up. She is definately mentally unstable and needs professional help, and for her anorexia, her figure is grotesque and not at all model material...!!

Why did Cheryl call the Prince 'a plant'? Was it meant as a joke or serious ??