Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 5463527)

How very liberal and open-minded of you, but this very woman has been on a show called "Sex, Lies and Rinsing Guys." In this show she brags about desperate men buying her gifts for her time. We have seen her, first-hand, reeling these muppets in. There are many (probably not thousands) threads about her job probably because a good number of people are outraged that such behaviour is being normalised and she is being given celebrity status for what in some cases may be deemed financial abuse. The dipping of her toe (and likely other parts) into the porn industry for quick cash, in my opinion, shows there are likely few boundaries in her skyping if the price is right.

I do not wish to let this go, but thanks for the kind and liberal advice. And whilst she is on the television, in magazines and likely on the internet, I shall continue to express my opinion that she should not be. Porn does not lead vulnerable men on with the hope of a future relationship whilst systematically stripping them of all they own. Danica does. Were you to find your parents/son/nephew/cousin duped in this manner I doubt you would view this so liberally.

Originally Posted by BigBrother3232 (Post 5463553)

Thanks for repeating yourself, but can I advise that if you're gonna carry on expressing your boring opinions because you see her in magazines, to stop reading the articles?

Idiots buy her gifts because idiots want her time. Build a ****ing bridge!

Originally Posted by BigBrother3232 (Post 5463553)

Thanks for repeating yourself, but can I advise that if you're gonna carry on expressing your boring opinions because you see her in magazines, to stop reading the articles?

Idiots buy her gifts because idiots want her time. Build a ****ing bridge!

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 5463625)

If you see no problem with what she does, that's your issue. If I express my dislike of it and it upsets you, read another thread. I love my opinions and am struggling to recall any of yours that were either humorous or insightful. But each to their own. That's why this is a forum, and not your own personal tabloid.

Originally Posted by JH95 (Post 5463628)

Your posts are neither humorous or insightful, just narrow-minded. Blowing your own trumpet much.

Originally Posted by JH95 (Post 5463628)

Your posts are neither humorous or insightful, just narrow-minded. Blowing your own trumpet much.

Originally Posted by JH95 (Post 5463521)

Doing porn doesnt mean she was desperate, plenty do porn, I dont see the problem with it. Besides, without porn what else would I use to... ya know....

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 5463655)

I am, JH95. And I have the confidence to ignore childish digs and put my point across despite being heckled. There has been no basis to any of you normalising Danica's "job" other than stating that the men she robs are "idiots". I find this very "narrow-minded" as there are many lonely vulnerable men out there who would risk everything at the sniff of affection and she plays upon this. Were you to show any empathy for some of these guys and realise how damaging what she does could be, you might be less dismissive. But that might take too much effort and humanity on your part.

Originally Posted by JH95 (Post 5463628)

Your posts are neither humorous or insightful, just narrow-minded. Blowing your own trumpet much.

Originally Posted by BigBrother3232 (Post 5463691)

Thanks for being the first to say what I'm sure everybody is thinking!

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 5463625)

If you see no problem with what she does, that's your issue. If I express my dislike of it and it upsets you, read another thread. I love my opinions and am struggling to recall any of yours that were either humorous or insightful. But each to their own. That's why this is a forum, and not your own personal tabloid.

Originally Posted by BigBrother3232 (Post 5463709)

Your opinion does not upset me. It bores me. It confuses me?
Why would a person decide to make yet another negative thread on this girls job? How original!

If you're not prepared to hear the other side of your opinion on your own thread without resulting in asking people who disagree with you to read a different thread. Don't post your thoughts in the first place!

Originally Posted by JH95 (Post 5463678)

You just made a childish dig to BigBrother3232, don't start taking some moral highground. Her job is her job. She, as a human being, had the choice to chose any career path of her choice that she wanted. She chose the path of modelling/providing services in exchange for gifts. Men do not need to enter her web address. Men do not have to buy her gifts. They do this in the full knowledge that doing this will cost them money. That's THEIR choice, not hers. Does she gag them and handcuff them demanding payment? No. Oh and a nice little dig at me at the end of your paragraph, how mature.

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 5463720)

If you'd bothered to read the post above my reference to BigBrother3232 instead of jumping on a bandwagon, you might have noticed his initial reference to my "boring opinion" which I was responding to. My reference to empathy and humanity on your part was based solely on what I perceive to be an "I'm alright, Jack" attitude from your posts. I don't know you, and don't think I ever will but can only comment on what I read. It was quite mature, thanks, and if you actually look back at the nature and tone of each post in this thread, you'll find that the histrionic frat-house whooping has not originated from me. once again, congratulations on masturbating. That disclosure has quite possibly changed my life.

Originally Posted by BigBrother3232 (Post 5463709)

Your opinion does not upset me. It bores me. It confuses me?
Why would a person decide to make yet another negative thread on this girls job? How original!

If you're not prepared to hear the other side of your opinion on your own thread without resulting in asking people who disagree with you to read a different thread. Don't post your thoughts in the first place!

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 5463728)

If you are confused, highlight the words you struggle with and I shall use less syllables. My reference to reading a thread was based on your dismissive tone that if I had a negative opinion of Danica's presence in the media, I should not read such articles or express an opinion if I did. The irony of your outrage may be lost upon you in this context, but I'm sure there is an adult nearby that can explain it all.

Originally Posted by BigBrother3232 (Post 5463795)

No, its okay, you're boring me now. But I'm sure somebody will pick up where I left off if they want to read more of you repeating yourself.

If an article annoys you. Don't read it! (Duhr)
If the opposite opinion to yours annoys you. Don't start a thread with your opinion.

Idiots who want Danicas time, buy her stuff.
Most people who have friends to talk to, don't buy her things. I don't understand why you think its immoral.

People do porn and nobody condemns it. Its a part of life, that once you grow up, you're gonna have to get over. Or spend your life continuing whining.

Either way, I'm bored of you, have a nice night.

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 5463888)

As stated before I have no issue with porn or the industry, just taking advantage of the vulnerable. Not all people that will buy Danica things should be called idiots. And finally, if an article annoys you, read it, weigh it up and then form an opinion and express it. I will continue to do so and have done so with your posts. "i'm bored of you" is a weak sign-off showing a lack of substance to your argument and is clearly untrue as you took the time to respond. Night Night.

Originally Posted by JH95 (Post 5463928)

Can I ask, why are they vunerable? Are they children with no minds of their own? Are they underage? Oh, wait, they are full grown men with full control of their wallets.

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 5463959)

A lot of people with mental illnesses, low self-esteem and interpersonal difficulties use the internet as a form of safe interaction where the distance is comfortable and can be decreased at a rate they are able to cope with. Such people will be cannonfodder for Danica's entrepreneurial efforts. What safeguards are in place for their protection? Nil.

And BigBrother3232, I thought you'd gone to bed....

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 5463462)

I apologise for making such horrible assumptions as to how she earns her gifts.

http://www.mtv.co.uk/news/big-brothe...ty-big-brother

This lady is clearly all about boundaries....