ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   it's a huge day today [US Presidential Election] (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=215070)

Roy Mars III 06-11-2012 03:01 AM

very excited for it. This will be my first time I can vote for president so that makes it even more important.

Alf 06-11-2012 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21 (Post 5592981)
not really it has 24 hours in it just like any other :idc:

boom boom

SharkAttack 06-11-2012 04:14 AM

Anyone placing/taking bets on the action? http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/p...ial/shifty.gif

lostalex 06-11-2012 04:15 AM

I'm not voting this year, but if i did i'd vote for Roseanne and the Peace & Freedom party.

Roseanne 2012
http://www.alan.com/wp-content/uploa...03-300x200.jpg

Cherie 06-11-2012 07:04 AM

Im nervous for Obama...

Nedusa 06-11-2012 07:21 AM

The American presidential election is a complete and utter farce, one of the most modern countries in the world with an election process designed and developed over 200 years ago. It bears no relation to the modern world it does not even allow any American vote to actually count for either candidate directly. It basically means for each state the majority of the popular vote wins all the electoral college votes designated for that state..???

Wtf does that mean ?? Well different states were given more or less of these Electoral College votes depending on their perceived importance. It means the popular vote in States like California will always tip toward the Democrats and the popular vote in Texas will always swing towards the republicans. So the losing popular votes on these states count for nothing.

What a farce as the whole election boils down to winning the popular vote in just a few swing states..!!!

Get rid of this ridiculous outdated undemocratic system and replace it with a one person one vote = most votes wins system...!!!

lostalex 06-11-2012 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nedusa (Post 5593289)
The American presidential election is a complete and utter farce, one of the most modern countries in the world with an election process designed and developed over 200 years ago. It bears no relation to the modern world it does not even allow any American vote to actually count for either candidate directly. It basically means for each state the majority of the popular vote wins all the electoral college votes designated for that state..???

Wtf does that mean ?? Well different states were given more or less of these Electoral College votes depending on their perceived importance. It means the popular vote in States like California will always tip toward the Democrats and the popular vote in Texas will always swing towards the republicans. So the losing popular votes on these states count for nothing.

What a farce as the whole election boils down to winning the popular vote in just a few swing states..!!!

Get rid of this ridiculous outdated undemocratic system and replace it with a one person one vote = most votes wins system...!!!


Well it's still more democratic than the UK. You don't even get to vote for your leader in any way shape or form. Gordon Brown was your PM for a year, remind me again when he was elected by anyone? No one in the UK has any say at all in your elections. The Parties get to decide. You can only vote for your local MP. Now let's talk about the House of Lords... they arn't elected by ANYONE and they serve for LIFE. so no one in the UK has any right to criticize our democratic process, thank you.

SharkAttack 06-11-2012 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lostalex (Post 5593224)
I'm not voting this year, but if i did i'd vote for Roseanne and the Peace & Freedom party.

Roseanne 2012
http://www.alan.com/wp-content/uploa...03-300x200.jpg

Damnit, Alex, we've got a lot of important propositions to weigh in on here. If you're a registered voter, send out the love today, nevermind the presidency. :hugesmile:

Nedusa 06-11-2012 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lostalex (Post 5593290)
Well it's still more democratic than the UK. You don't even get to vote for your leader in any way shape or form. Gordon Brown was your PM for a year, remind me again when he was elected by anyone?

Yes I agree with you our system is pretty crap too as we only get to vote for the party not the party leader.

Maybe we should all revert to the French system...!!!

lostalex 06-11-2012 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SharkAttack (Post 5593291)
Damnit, Alex, we've got a lot of important propositions to weigh in on here. If you're a registered voter, send out the love today, nevermind the presidency. :hugesmile:

The only thing I care about on the California ballot is the proposition that deals with the death penalty. I do hope my fellow Californians choose to do away with the death penalty. That's the only thing i regret not voting on though.

California will obviously go for Obama, he doesn't need my vote. California will continue to be a blue state without my vote. If there was any chance at all that Romney could take California, then i'd be voting, but there is no chance.

Nedusa 06-11-2012 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lostalex (Post 5593290)
Well it's still more democratic than the UK. You don't even get to vote for your leader in any way shape or form. Gordon Brown was your PM for a year, remind me again when he was elected by anyone? No one in the UK has any say at all in your elections. The Parties get to decide. You can only vote for your local MP. Now let's talk about the House of Lords... they arn't elected by ANYONE and they serve for LIFE. so no one in the UK has any right to criticize our democratic process, thank you.

I see you're from California , good luck voting for Romney in that state..!!!

lostalex 06-11-2012 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nedusa (Post 5593299)
I see you're from California , good luck voting for Romney in that state..!!!

you obviously are not paying attention. I said the only reason i would vote is if i thought that it MIGHT go for Romney, i'd vote AGAINST Romney. But there is no threat of Romney winning here, that's why i'm not voting.

Nedusa 06-11-2012 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lostalex (Post 5593300)
you obviously are not paying attention. I said the only reason i would vote is if i thought that it MIGHT go for Romney, i'd vote AGAINST Romney.

No no I was paying attention, I was merely pointing out to reinforce my earlier post that you as a voter in California , if you wanted to vote for Romney to win your vote would have little impact in that state as the majority popular vote will pretty much always be Democratic . Clearly you are an Obama supporter.

I also support Obama as I feel he inherited a huge mess 4 years ago and needs a bit more time to carry forward his plans. Also I think Obama understands the problems of the US and how to carry the US forward in today's world.

Romney..?? Well he just frightens the hell out of me...!!!!

lostalex 06-11-2012 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nedusa (Post 5593303)
No no I was paying attention, I was merely pointing out to reinforce my earlier post that you as a voter in California , if you wanted to vote for Romney to win your vote would have little impact in that state as the majority popular vote will pretty much always be Democratic . Clearly you are an Obama supporter.

I also support Obama as I feel he inherited a huge mess 4 years ago and needs a bit more time to carry forward his plans. Also I think Obama understands the problems of the US and how to carry the US forward in today's world.

Romney..?? Well he just frightens the hell out of me...!!!!

Oh, okay, I see what you meant now, you are right it must be very frustrating for Republicans in California. just like for Democrats in the Red States.

SharkAttack 06-11-2012 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lostalex (Post 5593296)
The only thing I care about on the California ballot is the proposition that deals with the death penalty. I do hope my fellow Californians choose to do away with the death penalty. That's the only thing i regret not voting on though.

California will obviously go for Obama, he doesn't need my vote. California will continue to be a blue state without my vote. If there was any chance at all that Romney could take California, then i'd be voting, but there is no chance.

Poppycock! Toss your votes in, Alex! If you can't for other reasons, then nevermind. :)

Kazanne 06-11-2012 07:54 AM

I'll be watching and hoping Obama wins.

MTVN 06-11-2012 10:33 AM

I don't think it's gonna be as close as people are saying, I'll be very surprised if Obama doesn't win

lostalex 06-11-2012 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 5593393)
I don't think it's gonna be as close as people are saying, I'll be very surprised if Obama doesn't win


I remember back in 2004 when i said the same thing about Kerry...lol

I said to myself "how the ******* can anyone vote for Bush? OBVIOUSLY Kerry is gonna win".....oops.

Maia 06-11-2012 11:29 AM

Romney is a nice chap I would like to see him win

Tom4784 06-11-2012 11:59 AM

I've got everything crossed for an Obama victory, The world does not need Romney as president.

Marsh. 06-11-2012 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mollie. (Post 5593451)
Romney is a nice chap I would like to see him win

:shocked:

Black Dagger 06-11-2012 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mollie. (Post 5593451)
Romney is a nice chap I would like to see him win

You haven't paid any attention to the election whatsoever have you? ;)

Black Dagger 06-11-2012 12:05 PM

Romney being described as a 'nice chap' is really quite worrying.

BBfanUSA 06-11-2012 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nedusa (Post 5593289)
The American presidential election is a complete and utter farce, one of the most modern countries in the world with an election process designed and developed over 200 years ago. It bears no relation to the modern world it does not even allow any American vote to actually count for either candidate directly. It basically means for each state the majority of the popular vote wins all the electoral college votes designated for that state..???

Wtf does that mean ?? Well different states were given more or less of these Electoral College votes depending on their perceived importance. It means the popular vote in States like California will always tip toward the Democrats and the popular vote in Texas will always swing towards the republicans. So the losing popular votes on these states count for nothing.

What a farce as the whole election boils down to winning the popular vote in just a few swing states..!!!

Get rid of this ridiculous outdated undemocratic system and replace it with a one person one vote = most votes wins system...!!!

and...it'll never happen because the states with lesser populations will get the shaft. I'm serious you'd basically need California,Texas,NY, basically the top 5/10 in order to win. Not all the states would be represented.

Even if more fair for the Rs in Cali or the Ds in a deeply R State.

I'll be voting as well. Iowa, A swing state, There's a very important measure on the ballot on retaining a supreme court judge that allowed Gay Marriage in my state. Now that more people are aware of it in my state. He's staying

BBfanUSA 06-11-2012 12:37 PM

BTW I am voting in a little bit waiting for the 9 to 5 rush to get over before I do.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.