Its Illegal
not just wrong.


You Are the Only Poster on here is support
of Illegal Sex.


Laws are here long before any of us.

On the James Bulger thread there were members condemning vigilante behaviour...for child killers.
Now it seems it's acceptable for a guy meeting teens? And before anyone enquires no, I do not think that is right to do that.

Some children do develop faster than others but that is of no consequence, a 15 year old is a child in the eyes of the law. A line has to be drawn somewhere. 15 year olds may think they're all sophisticated and mature but the fact is they're not.

The legality is an issue of location, in some countries its 14 in others its 18. Basically your saying all those countries where the age of consent is less than 16 (which are often countries that are much more progressive than Britain) have it wrong.
The Age of consent is imaginary. As long as the sexual interactions are consensually, i.e. both people have gone through puberty and are mentally sound, then there is no problem.

I think people need to be careful. From that video it seems as though those guys set up a fake profile on plenty of fish and made contact with that guy as a means of luring him in.

That's extremely dodgy ground and those interviewers, whilst providing a potentially justified service, are complete vigilante idiots. "Leave that booze there mate coz it's gonna be a fuc*ing long night."

"Nonce hunters."

Being approached and groomed is one thing. Luring lonely old guys into situations they may never ever have found themselves in, is quite another. I'm not excusing his behaviour, far from it, but the examples are completely different from each other.

Think I'll hold judgment till all the facts are known

In England a fifteen year old is under age. You can twist it around whatever way you like, the law says they are a child.

The location is England though where the law says the age of consent is 16...

Give it 20 years and it will have dropped, believe me. Britain is coming out of the dark ages, we will have gay marriage, equal retirement ages, and an age of consent of 14.

I'm fairly sure it'll be a long way off before age of consent is 14. Which party introduces the "we want to be able to have sex with younger girls" bill, in parliament?

:crazy:

Yes but this is a UK Site.

Its against our Laws
Bang them up.

You are Deluded

Lmao. So true, i dont think the age will ever be lowered tbh

I don't think the limit should ever be lowered
Yes obvs some 14 year olds will be mature enough BUT there will be a much less proportion of ready mature 14 year olds, than ready mature 16 years olds. Also it just opens it up to more young girls being manipulated and pressured into sex at an earlier age

"Coming out of the dark ages" doesn't necessarily mean allowing children to have sex with adults. But if you're campaigning for a change of law, good luck fighting through that particular amendment to the Sexual Offences Act.

Hun, go back 50 years and that the reaction you'd get to the idea of legalising gay sex.
Go back 15 years and thats the reaction you'd get to the idea of making the age of consent equal for both heterosexuals and homosexuals.

This thread is about underage sex and how you think it's a good idea. Equality for Lesbian and Gay couples is a different issue completely.

:laugh2:

Not really, its like comparing the Gay Rights to Womens Rights, the comparison are pretty clear when you stand far enough back.

Looks like the idea is already being batted around.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/he...ent-to-14.html

In 1860 the age of consent was 12, it was later raised to 13 because of young girls being sold to brothels. In the same year it was illegal for men to have sex with each other, the punishment was death.

These laws have evolved in differnt directions, the age of consent now protects more girls. While gay male sex is no longer outlawed.

And now you want to add Women's Rights into it :shrug:

Rubbish


Prime Minister David Cameron rejected the ''offensive'' suggestion that the age of sexual consent could be reduced.

so it's mature to want to have sex with a 61 year old?

christ I bet your kids will be a hoot

All I am saying is a mentally sane teenager who has been through puberty is mature enough to decide who they want to have sex with. This is a basic human right, and I will be on the right side on history.

Who's going to decide which particular children are mature enough, mentally and physically, to have sex? You? The Government? Who in particular do you have in mind to make that call?